Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Yea I do, but the archon is the only thing that looked all powerful.I loove Starcraft
All 3 races, but battlecruisers are better than carriers, if you disagree meet me onthe videogame forum, and I am waiting for you cresh, also Straw I can't find out how to get that signature pic you mentioned, I didn't find it onthe thread search.
Try the artwork forum.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Again you use your strawman argument.
fallacy of hasty generalization..🙄
You incorrectly use this term, and are just attempting to be argumentative.
fallacy of slotful induction...🙄
Your future posts will be ignored since both of the above indicate you to be a troll.
Hey it's okay if you ignore them..you seem quite adept at ignoring facts anyway..I'll just accept that as you conceeding to my superior logic/arguments 😆😆😆
Particularly your false usage of the logical fallacy terms.
false meaning..you have little means/ability to rebut them..🙄...
Have fun debating...fanboy...😆😆😆
Originally posted by jinzinGood lord.
how is he supposed to "rubut" nonsense? 😕
The terms he's using shows that he has no clue what he's talking about.
The slothful induction. . . Wow. . he's just spouting gibberish.
Slothful induction is exactly what some of these people do. The proper conclusion of an inductive argument is denied despite the evidence to the contrary.
And that's exactly what he's doing. It's obvious he dosen't understand any of these terms. I've pointed this out and his own statements are hard evidence of this.
The hasty generilization that he calims I've made from pointing out a strawman. . . A hasty generilization is like if you encouter two people of a given race and they are smoking cigarettes, then a hasty generilzation is thinking that ALL of the people of the given race are smokers.
By claiming that we claim that you can use no logic in these debates is based off of us saying you shouldn't use real world logic, as the comic book logic overrides some of it. So we say to use comic book logic. But he commits the strawman fallacy when he says we claim you can't use any logic. I point out that it's a strawman and he calls it a hasty generalization.
So yes he really is spouting off nonesense.
I'd love to see how his twisted logic allows
You incorrectly use this term, and are just attempting to be argumentative.
to be claimed as slothful induction.
Originally posted by 8bitChris
So what do you make of Spiderman lifting train cars, holding up buildings? and other feats of Superhuman strength?
I got nothing against spiderman lifting train cars, holding up buildings and other feats of superhuman strenght. Or any other of superhuman feat you have him doing becasue they are all within his arena.
How many of those punches do you think Batman can take? Or are we under the assumption that Spiderman wont land any? I'd imagine not to many. I'd also imagine a punch that strong shattering his unprotected jaw 😛. Or did he receive another lame upgrade over the years where he studied with monks from another dimension how to make his human bones stronger than adamantium? Personally, I don't think you "cancelled" anything.
A baraged of unpulled punches from spiderman is going to be enough for him to put batman down. That is to say that batman does not have a trick up his sleeve to push spiderman back and break up the barrage attack. You know batman training with monks from a different dimension might be closer to home than you think. Batman has created or has in his possesions to build a dimension gate.
Batman was fun when he was in Gotham. Now he's just a guy with poorly written upgrades so he can hang with Superman and the rest of the Justice League on a cosmic level where he really has no business being. Compare what Batman had when he started to what he has now, it's ridiculous. The charm was the Batman was human, and he's not even that anymore.
So according to you batman is not allowed to grow simply because he is human? He has to have powers?
Originally posted by Creshosk
Good lord.
The terms he's using shows that he has no clue what he's talking about.
The slothful induction. . . Wow. . he's just spouting gibberish.
Slothful induction is exactly what some of these people do. The proper conclusion of an inductive argument is denied despite the evidence to the contrary.
And that's exactly what he's doing. It's obvious he dosen't understand any of these terms. I've pointed this out and his own statements are hard evidence of this.
logic fallacy of hasty generalization...😆😆
The hasty generilization that he calims I've made from pointing out a strawman. . . A hasty generilization is like if you encouter two people of a given race and they are smoking cigarettes, then a hasty generilzation is thinking that ALL of the people of the given race are smokers.
logic fallacy of Appeal to Authority...😆
By claiming that we claim that you can use no logic in these debates is based off of us saying you shouldn't use real world logic, as the comic book logic overrides some of it. So we say to use comic book logic. But he commits the strawman fallacy when he says we claim you can't use any logic. I point out that it's a strawman and he calls it a hasty generalization.
So yes he really is spouting off nonesense.
Logic fallacy of irrelevant conclusion...😆😆
I'd love to see how his twisted logic allows
to be claimed as slothful indication.
😕 hey aren't you supposed to be ignoring my posts?
Conclusion: Cresh is a Batman fanboy, and has very little debating ability....oh yeah...and Spider Man wins..😆😆😆
Originally posted by jinzin
I love how you resort to calling everyone and anyone who argues in a debate for ANYONE vs. spiderman a fanboy...........
I only call people fanboys when they spout stuff like
Batman can punch harder than Spidey...
Captain America has taken punches from the Hulk...
Wolverine can jump 3 stories in the air..
Unfortunately you and Cresh generally happen to be the ones spouting off stuff like that...so I gotta tell the truth..ya know..even though it hurts..😆😆😆
Originally posted by StrawNilla
BATMAN-IS-HUMAN! He cannot survive an unpulled punch from Spidey! Just the thought is illogical! It's just-beyond-his-physical-capacity. Period. And that's all I'm going to say about that.
WOw I thought I said batman was in his boxers, and that is just it. And he is going to survive an unpulled punch from spiderman. I never mentioned batman's suit. at all. Of course batman in this situation batman is not going to survive. Because of the suit he was able to survive a punch from a ticked off superman from the future, and again from a superman under the control of red kryptonite.
Is this logical? Superman >>>>>>> many times stronger than spiderman. If some guy survive a punch from superman is it logical for that guy to survive the best spiderman has to offer?
Please just answer the question and not beating around the bush. This is just a straight yes or No question.
As for your second point, I'm not saying that Batman has to be inside the Batmobile for it to do anything. Just as he does not have to be inside it for Spidey to flip it. And if it's coming towards Spidey, Batman need not do anything before or after Spidey evades it early of a "heads up" courtesy of the spider sense beforehand.
So you are acknowledging the fact that batman can control his mobiles with a remote control. Because you STRAWNILLA said that I'm not saying that Batman has to be inside the Batmobile for it to do anything. Apart from that I am lost.
again whob WHO am I fanboy of?!?!?!!?!!?!?!? you'll never ever ever guess it! so stop calling me something I'm not.... at least we bring feats to the table backed with reference numbers and scans....what do you use to debate? oh yes...you literally made up an entire debate against me using "quotes" I NEVER WROTE! 😂
okay...but we're the fanboys huh?
Originally posted by jinzinDAMN RIGHT 😄
again whob WHO am I fanboy of?!?!?!!?!!?!?!? you'll never ever ever guess it! so stop calling me something I'm not.... at least we bring feats to the table backed with reference numbers and scans....what do you use to debate? oh yes...you literally made up an entire debate against me using "quotes" I NEVER WROTE! 😂okay...but we're the fanboys huh?
Originally posted by whobdamandog
I only call people fanboys when they spout stuff likeBatman can punch harder than Spidey...
Captain America has taken punches from the Hulk...
Wolverine can jump 3 stories in the air..
Unfortunately you and Cresh generally happen to be the ones spouting off stuff like that...so I gotta tell the truth..ya know..even though it hurts..😆😆😆
When has Captain America taken a punch from the Hulk without his shield? 🤨
Originally posted by jinzin
again whob WHO am I fanboy of?!?!?!!?!!?!?!? you'll never ever ever guess it! so stop calling me something I'm not.... at least we bring feats to the table backed with reference numbers and scans....what do you use to debate? oh yes...you literally made up an entire debate against me using "quotes" I NEVER WROTE! 😂okay...but we're the fanboys huh?
You keep saying that Batman beats enemies that outclass him in his comics. That doesn't make it canon. The same can be said of Spiderman, and countless others.
Find the definition of the word, 'fanboy'.