Batman vs Spiderman

Originally posted by brainchild81
Bane's not all that powerful. Joker's really not all that powerful. Supes has an easily exploitable weakness, always holds back, and Bats often has help. Bats Vs. Hulk was another badly written crossover(some may try to pretend bad writing doesn't exist, but they know it does). And to my knowledge Bats hasn't beaten Cap in a fight that wasn't decided on by fan(boy) votes. He pretty much yielded to Cap in JLA/Avengers. He talked his way out of an a$$ kicking.

You're two last points are highly opinionative.

This IS a message board Merc.🙄 What's your op on what transpired?

Bat's knowing he was in for fight, In no way is admission of defeat. In fact he won, he ended the fight and got what he wanted. Sure it was a writers cop out so that they didn't have to have a clear victor, but to say that Batman lost that fight is simply wishful thinking at best.

As for Hulk, It was Prof. Hulk, who durability is not as high as other Hulks. He wasn't even angry at all. It was a pressure point hit. And Batman hits far more effectively (as proven by his fight with Grundy) than you give him credit for.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Bat's knowing he was in for fight, In no way is admission of defeat. In fact he won, he ended the fight and got what he wanted. Sure it was a writers cop out so that they didn't have to have a clear victor, but to say that Batman lost that fight is simply wishful thinking at best.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS

As for Hulk, It was Prof. Hulk, who durability is not as high as other Hulks. He wasn't even angry at all. It was a pressure point hit. And Batman hits far more effectively (as proven by his fight with Grundy) than you give him credit for.

Originally posted by brainchild81
Who said that?

Originally posted by brainchild81
And to my knowledge Bats hasn't beaten Cap in a fight that wasn't decided on by fan(boy) votes. He pretty much yielded to Cap in JLA/Avengers. He talked his way out of an a$$ kicking.

Yeilded, talked his way out of an ass kicking?

Originally posted by brainchild81
Who said that?

aparently you.

Originally posted by brainchild81
We must be talking about 2 different books. He sure wasn't acting like Prof Hulk.

we could be.

Brainchild: yes what merc said... oppinionated..
they wrote those scrips for a reason... Batman has beaten the Hulk, mostly because of the popularity.. but thats still a loss.

latherface...don't tell you've never heard ot the oh so freat "i don't like it it didn't happen" argument...

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Mitchell doesn't understand the importance of tactical superiority. He'd have you beleive that a hundred U.S rangers would lose to a thousand armed Somalians.

whatever, I'm a firm believer in fighting and technique, but spidey has some as well.

How many points of technique have I brought here, nad he wont have significant time to come up with as much plans as you'd like not to say he won't be effective.

BATMAN HITS HARDER THAN SPIDERMAN!!

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
whatever, I'm a firm believer in fighting and technique, but spidey has some as well.

Then you over estimate Spidey's "unique style" or underestimate the Bat.

Styles are for mediocre fighters.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
How many points of technique have I brought here, nad he wont have significant time to come up with as much plans as you'd like not to say he won't be effective.

Then you underestimate Bat's strategic knowledge. There's a reason he's field leader of the JLA.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
BATMAN HITS HARDER THAN SPIDERMAN!!

I didn't know you felt that way.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Then you over estimate Spidey's "unique style" or underestimate the Bat.

In a fight, it would be much harder to defend against someone with superhuman strength and speed, attacking from all angles, with somewhat lesser precision, than it would be to defend against a peak human at max training.

Just curious, is bats a better fighter than wolverine?

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Styles are for mediocre fighters.

Thank you for confirming that!!! If you have the principles down and application, then you can slap whatever flashy moves on there you want, so this kills the bat knows 127 different styles, as they derive off of one another.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Then you underestimate Bat's strategic knowledge. There's a reason he's field leader of the JLA.

Hardly, but he needs time to be that many steps ahead of someone with spidey's physioligy, or venoms, but he could easily be miles ahead of someone like bane,spidey is fast and isn't a fool. Like you want him to be.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
I didn't know you felt that way.

HEy, I jump the ship with fools, and i am the one getting picked on still..... sad posts get sleepy smilies, I remember when you made fun of that guy that said Cap was an inferior leader to cyke, but hey, if you on't like it don't do it.

<<-Hardly, but he needs time to be that many steps ahead of someone with spidey's physioligy, or venoms, but he could easily be miles ahead of someone like bane,spidey is fast and isn't a fool. Like you want him to be.->>

nanoseconds perhaps...."quicker where it counts"...up top....brain...you know what I'm talking about...

Spiderman plans well too, he takes advantage of the enemies offensive.

"He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight" ....Sun Tzu - THE ART OF WAR

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
In a fight, it would be much harder to defend against someone with superhuman strength and speed, attacking from all angles, with somewhat lesser precision, than it would be to defend against a peak human at max training.

A slight speed advantage.

And you're wrong, I'd much rather beat on someone attacking half assed from all angels than a max training fighter.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Just curious, is bats a better fighter than wolverine?

Equal if not better.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Thank you for confirming that!!! If you have the principles down and application, then you can slap whatever flashy moves on there you want, so this kills the bat knows 127 different styles, as they derive off of one another.

I don't know what you're excited about but you're welcome.

Either way, Batman is the far superior fighter no matter how unique Spidey's style might be. A true fighter knows how to take advantage of his opponents matrix of expectations. Something that Batman does all the time. I don't beleive I've seen Spidey do this once.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Hardly, but he needs time to be that many steps ahead of someone with spidey's physioligy, or venoms, but he could easily be miles ahead of someone like bane,spidey is fast and isn't a fool. Like you want him to be.

Brain signals work at the speed of light. Spidey isn't a fool, he's just outclassed. Like you refuse to accept because it's so damaging to your arguements.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
HEy, I jump the ship with fools, and i am the one getting picked on still..... sad posts get sleepy smilies, I remember when you made fun of that guy that said Cap was an inferior leader to cyke, but hey, if you on't like it don't do it.

I was right then too.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
A slight speed advantage.

Where's my sleep smiley,oh here it is..........

sleep1

So now not only does Batman hit harder than spiderman, he almost equals his speed. You're losing credibility my friend.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
And you're wrong, I'd much rather beat on someone attacking half assed from all angels than a max training fighter.

No you are wrong, spdierman does not attack on half assed angles, his corrdination and agility are SUPERIOR, batman's comes from trainig, spidermna's from a gift, Wizard vs. Sorcerer, though I would normally say wizard, lets just say this sorcerer is a great warrior too.

Equal if not better.

I don't know what you're excited about but you're welcome.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Either way, Batman is the far superior fighter no matter how unique Spidey's style might be. A true fighter knows how to take advantage of his opponents matrix of expectations. Something that Batman does all the time. I don't beleive I've seen Spidey do this once.

You say "better " fighter, I say more skilled, the fighter who is a greater threat at close range is spiderman, and thus he is the better "combatant"

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Brain signals work at the speed of light. Spidey isn't a fool, he's just outclassed. Like you refuse to accept because it's so damaging to your arguements.

Not quite light speed, you would be able to catch a ruler much fatsterwhen someone drops it, without anticipation then, Batman's outclassed, you damage your own arguments with ridiculous claims, of batman's proress, thus destroying the greatest point of batman, he has NO POWERS.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
I was right then too.

Yep a right fool.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Where's my sleep smiley,oh here it is..........

sleep1

So now not only does Batman hit harder than spiderman, he almost equals his speed. You're losing credibility my friend.

As does Wolverine, see what I did there? I used an example that actually happened. You should try it some time.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
No you are wrong, spdierman does not attack on half assed angles, his corrdination and agility are SUPERIOR, batman's comes from trainig, spidermna's from a gift, Wizard vs. Sorcerer, though I would normally say wizard, lets just say this sorcerer is a great warrior too.

Great warrior my eye. I might beleive you if he wasn't so consistantly whipped by ninjas and the like.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
You say "better " fighter, I say more skilled, the fighter who is a greater threat at close range is spiderman, and thus he is the better "combatant"

True, but not by as far as you would have othere beleive.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Not quite light speed, you would be able to catch a ruler much fatsterwhen someone drops it, without anticipation then, Batman's outclassed, you damage your own arguments with ridiculous claims, of batman's proress, thus destroying the greatest point of batman, he has NO POWERS.

Move not work. You expect everyone to know exactly what you're talking about but even when you say things that are direct contradiction to your arguements and then nick pick at a minor discrepency.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Yep a right fool.

Yep, a blatant hypocrite.

you are wrong,plain and simple. Spiderman is physically superior to batman and wolverine, and the scientific equal of bats, thus youre argument is absurd, don't bother voicing your opinion, dont' bother voicing your ridiculois opinion

Where am I wrong? You mind quoting me so I know? I never argued that Spidey wasn't Bat's scientific equal, but there are more than a single aspect of the mind. Bats dwarfes Spidey mentally, I never said scientifically. Again, quote me.

I meant I was absurd, I've made you mad now, I'll log off until you calm down, bye bye good friend, though I heard you hated me anyway.

I could understand how you think I am angry. You insist I am wrong, tell my I'm absurd, and that I shouldn't bother posting anymore. I suppose that would anger some.

Please re-read your post, they have been misleading as of lates.