Where is the proof that hes faster, and more agile ?
Where is the proof that he is that much good of adodger. They say Little robin is agile and could dodge. Where does Spiderman use it to proove it.
You don't have to buy it. Just goto a comic book store and glance at the latest issue of Amazing Spiderman. It'll show proof that Spiderman is a better dodger than Batman could ever dream.
Originally posted by 8bitChris
You don't have to buy it. Just goto a comic book store and glance at the latest issue of Amazing Spiderman. It'll show proof that Spiderman is a better dodger than Batman could ever dream.
see you don't read my posts. This cleary shows it. Don't read half, and the ones I choose. Read all
I know thisKnow he is like I said above, i was just prooving soemthing to Cordera, on what he said to me.
Originally posted by Batman WinsWhat are you talking about? Clearly shows what Spidey is a better dodger than BAts.
see you don't read my posts. This cleary shows it. Don't read half, and the ones I choose. Read allI know thisKnow he is like I said above, i was just prooving soemthing to Cordera, on what he said to me.
Originally posted by willRules
WOW. I gotta go now for a while. No offence to you who support Bats but your argument has degraded to the point where you have utterly convinced me spidey takes this. If there was any doubt its not there anymore................Gotta go I hope I didnt offend anyone now.................
You need to read to. Some of the stuff I said I clearly stated That I didnt believe that bats is more agile, but just to proove a point to cordera
see just in case you miised the overall post
Oh, so who ever been hear longer, is right ? I see how it is.
and you heard things all before. You ever think why you keep hearing it ? because maybe its right, not just because you don't want to accept anything.
You came in hear and say oh don't take a guy named Batman wins seriously ?
Thats a good argument Sonny
Originally posted by newjak86
What are you talking about? Clearly shows what Spidey is a better dodger than BAts.
I know this, and once again, I was prooving a point to Cordera.see
Oh, so who ever been hear longer, is right ? I see how it is.
and you heard things all before. You ever think why you keep hearing it ? because maybe its right, not just because you don't want to accept anything.
You came in hear and say oh don't take a guy named Batman wins seriously ?
Thats a good argument Sonny
For "Batman WIns"
It's not an arguement. I just can't take anything you have to say seriously. You have an obvious bias. So any input you add to this debate reflects that.
Debates are supposed to be impartial. It's obvious that you are not.
And just because a couple people say the same thing over and over again doesn't mean it's right.
Like I said, common sense dictates that Spiderman wins.
Spiderman is physically superior in every aspect. They both have roughly the same experience; so making laundry lists of who has beat who is pointless. Those lists would be a mile long.
Batman has no way to break out of webbing. Spiderman can dodge anything Batman can throw at him.
It's just easy to figure out who wins.
Originally posted by 8bitChrisVery good but I would have to disagree with one thing. Batman is by far the better fighter and is more expreinced in that regard. Other than that you are right.
For "Batman WIns"It's not an arguement. I just can't take anything you have to say seriously. You have an obvious bias. So any input you add to this debate reflects that.
Debates are supposed to be impartial. It's obvious that you are not.
And just because a couple people say the same thing over and over again doesn't mean it's right.
Like I said, common sense dictates that Spiderman wins.
Spiderman is physically superior in every aspect. They both have roughly the same experience; so making laundry lists of who has beat who is pointless. Those lists would be a mile long.
Batman has no way to break out of webbing. Spiderman can dodge anything Batman can throw at him.
It's just easy to figure out who wins.
Originally posted by 8bitChris
For "Batman WIns"It's not an arguement. I just can't take anything you have to say seriously. You have an obvious bias. So any input you add to this debate reflects that.
Debates are supposed to be impartial. It's obvious that you are not.
And just because a couple people say the same thing over and over again doesn't mean it's right.
Like I said, common sense dictates that Spiderman wins.
Spiderman is physically superior in every aspect. They both have roughly the same experience; so making laundry lists of who has beat who is pointless. Those lists would be a mile long.
Batman has no way to break out of webbing. Spiderman can dodge anything Batman can throw at him.
It's just easy to figure out who wins.
1. You call me bias, when you just admitted that you don't even take anything seriously into consideration, because your bias mind says, dont listen to anything at all. I dont agree with one thing this guy says so I don't believe anything he says, I just don't take it seriously, Right
Originally posted by newjak86
Very good but I would have to disagree with one thing. Batman is by far the better fighter and is more expreinced in that regard. Other than that you are right.
Other people that disagree withone thing that I ever said, would just have it in there mind to disagree with everything I say. Like I say batman could fly, they disagree, then I say Batman has a belt, they will still disagree because its in there mind, they wont even agree on a little thing.
I am not biased Batman Wins I enjoy both characters very much. Even though Batman is out classed a straight up match no prep like he often is. Give him a month or two to plan and he could take down Spidey but not in a normal fight out of the Blue. Batman just doesn't have the means here really. He can't fight close up because he will get murdered. If he takes it far away Spidey can dodge everything Batman throws at him. By the end Batman is gonna be webbed up.
Originally posted by newjak86
I am not biased Batman Wins I enjoy both characters very much. Even though Batman is out classed a straight up match no prep like he often is. Give him a month or two to plan and he could take down Spidey but not in a normal fight out of the Blue. Batman just doesn't have the means here really. He can't fight close up because he will get murdered. If he takes it far away Spidey can dodge everything Batman throws at him. By the end Batman is gonna be webbed up.
No not you, some people here. 8 hint 8 hint
Very good but I would have to disagree with one thing. Batman is by far the better fighter and is more expreinced in that regard. Other than that you are right.
Having more training does not make one a "better fighter". It makes someone a more trained fighter. Spiderman has been in countless fights and has learned how to fight the hard way. You can't really gauge who is better. You can just say one has had more training. Then again, combat experience can double as training as well right?
1. You call me bias, when you just admitted that you don't even take anything seriously into consideration, because your bias mind says, dont listen to anything at all. I dont agree with one thing this guy says so I don't believe anything he says, I just don't take it seriously, Right
I never said I don't take anything seriously into consideration. I just said that any input you have is obviously a reflection of your bias. I havnt' read most of your posts because of it. It's obvious you'll pull things out of the air just to make Batman win.
I don't see how that would make me biased at all. Maybe i'm biased against people who are biased; but I don't really see that as a bad thing.
Originally posted by 8bitChris
Having more training does not make one a "better fighter". It makes someone a more trained fighter. Spiderman has been in countless fights and has learned how to fight the hard way. You can't really gauge who is better. You can just say one has had more training. Then again, combat experience can double as training as well right?I never said I don't take anything seriously into consideration. I just said that any input you have is obviously a reflection of your bias. I havnt' read most of your posts because of it. It's obvious you'll pull things out of the air just to make Batman win.
I don't see how that would make me biased at all. Maybe i'm biased against people who are biased; but I don't really see that as a bad thing.
What you said was you don't take anything I say seriously, so how am I going to convince anything if you have it in your mind, ohg I dont take you seriously
The difference, for the most part, through-out this whole debate has been solid evidence versus intangibles.
For example,
Fact:
Spiderman is faster, (much much) stronger, more agile, and the list goes on. It's not a knock to Batman. It's just that Spiderman is super human and Batman is not.
Intangibles:
Batman will think of a way to win.
On paper, it's common sense that Spiderman wins a random pick-up battle.
Of course, if you're a comic book writer, you can write a way for Batman to win. It happens all the time to both characters. It wouldnt' be any fun if the heroes weren't facing insurmountible odds. However, as far as stats go. Spidey should take it easily.
Originally posted by 8bitChris
TheFact:
Spiderman is faster, (much much) stronger, more agile, and the list goes on. It's not a knock to Batman. It's just that Spiderman is super human and Batman is not.Intangibles:
Batman will think of a way to win..
Never just said, Batman will just find away to win. I told you on what he does, then the other guys said what if Spidey Jumps on this and swings into this and back flips this(this doesnt sonds like they trying away for Spiderman to win ?)
If Batman had no belt with weapons, and gets put in a boxing ring with spiderman to box, then yeah he looses.
i've found out how Batman could beat Spiderman! He's probably really good at it... http://www.superdickery.com/seduction/40.html
Originally posted by 8bitChrisWell thats true and yet not right. If you are in alot of fights then yes you will pick up some basics but it isn't the same as actually combat training. Plus Spidey normally doesn't really have to fight do to his advanced skill levels he never really has to fight in toe to toe match ups as his overpowering abilities are normally enough. For instance you put Spidey on a football field and hand him the ball everyplay no one is gonna be able to take him down. He doesn't even practice so even though he plays alot of games he still doesn't know how the game is really played in terms of technique. Batman on the other hands trains to fight. He then understands basic fighting skills and such the Spidey will learn through hard knocks but then Batman also understands high level abilities that you can only achieve through training and learninf fighting. Trust me this is how it works. Batman has trained to be a better fighter he is a better fighter.
Having more training does not make one a "better fighter". It makes someone a more trained fighter. Spiderman has been in countless fights and has learned how to fight the hard way. You can't really gauge who is better. You can just say one has had more training. Then again, combat experience can double as training as well right?