Batman vs Spiderman

Started by Swanky-Tuna343 pages

Originally posted by jinzin
ohhhh and just for solidification.....DD clonse who happen to be even at 10 percent on their original are still head and shoulders above spidey in the speed, strength, and durability dept...

Dude, those clones blew so hard. Even at 10 percent they shouldn't of gone down like that.

"So long pigs post about Kingpin's strength is wrong and pointless right?"

no it was implied spiderman's fighting skills were too much for batman's to compensate...and that "ordinary humans" could never hurt spidey....obviously that ain't true....and batman's so much more dangerous than fisk in a one on one conftrontation....

"Because he can clock a bunch of terrible shots in the face with one batarang?
Or was there something written that was important? 'Cause I can't read any of that."

because when you have 6 or 8 thugs shooting automatic weapons at you they don't need to be good shots....but bats was too good and too fast.....

Originally posted by Creshosk
Yes I have, I like spiderman more than I like batman. I've read more spiderman comics than batman ones.

I love spider-man. . . but I hate it when a character is played out of character.


Again, what's out of character of Spidey coming to a conclusion of having to rush and/or KO an opponent to end a fight. KO'ing an opponent for Spidey isn't just beyond his moral beliefs and for you to say so just means that you really don't what Batman to win this fight.

Originally posted by jinzin
because when you have 6 or 8 thugs shooting automatic weapons at you they don't need to be good shots....

If you want to hit anything you do.

"Like I said, let me stick to my method of arguing. If I see something as a part of your argument that would make me think different from Spidey deducting that he should simply rush and KO Batman to end the fight, I'll let you know. Until then, don't tell me that I should think this or that, no offense but that's just not your place.'

weren't you telling me how to debate not 20 minutes ago? and IM THE HIPOCRITE? WTF?

"If you want to hit anything you do"

whaaa? I'm not een sure I follow....

Originally posted by jinzin
"Why does Spidey need to be on par with Quicksilver or bullet fire in terms of speed to catch Batman off guard hmmm?"

hmmmmmmmmm HERE'S WHY! 😱


Any proof that the guys Batman are fighting in that link are faster, as fast, or even close to being as fast as Spidey?

G'night folks, seriously, I'm very tired.

"Any proof that the guys Batman are fighting in that link are faster, as fast, or even close to being as fast as Spidey?

G'night folks, seriously, I'm very tired"

fast enough to catch superman off gaurd and send him over a mountain range.....

Originally posted by jinzin
whaaa? I'm not een sure I follow....

Automatic weapons have fierce recoil. If you just hold down the trigger like they were you get terrible accuracy.

Originally posted by jinzin
ohhhh and just for solidification.....DD clonse who happen to be even at 10 percent on their original are still head and shoulders above spidey in the speed, strength, and durability dept...
Wow! It looks like they have about 10% of a brain also. They didn't even try to dodge. did they? Posting that was a waste.

Originally posted by jinzin
spidey's agility and spidersense ain't lookin so hot here.....this is why rushing into a speed blitz is a BAAAAAD idea.....
I would have thought he'd have learned not to rush from occurences such as this. . and this is a known enemy. . .

Originally posted by jinzin
fast enough to catch superman off gaurd and send him over a mountain range.....

Those terrible shots sent Superman over a mountain range? He just be really losing his touch.

Originally posted by jinzin
"Like I said, let me stick to my method of arguing. If I see something as a part of your argument that would make me think different from Spidey deducting that he should simply rush and KO Batman to end the fight, I'll let you know. Until then, don't tell me that I should think this or that, no offense but that's just not your place.'

weren't you telling me how to debate not 20 minutes ago? and IM THE HIPOCRITE? WTF?


How was I telling you how to debate?

I was telling you that Spidey could kill, KO, and knock Batman down with one punch, it varies according to the power he utilizes.

But I never said: 'jinzin, you should argue this way' and neither did Chosk to me, however, he did tell me not to say that Spidey would speedblitz Batman, and I don't think he should do that.

If you took what I posted as telling you to think this way or that, then sorry, but I was only telling you my opinion.

"Automatic weapons have fierce recoil. If you just hold down the trigger like they were you get terrible accuracy"

that's like saying 8 guys with machine guns firing at the same moving target can't hit it......untill you find me some sort of expiremental results...I'm ignoring this....

and another thing....why do the henchmen have to be terrible shots.....it's out of character for raz to hire thugs with absolutely zero amount of training....batmans been doing this gig for 60+ years...why isn't it just that he's really good at what he does? is it because that doesn't cope well for the spidey argument?

Originally posted by jinzin
that's like saying 8 guys with machine guns firing at the same moving target can't hit it......

It's not like saying. That's exactly what I'm saying.
untill you find me some sort of expiremental results...I'm ignoring this....

Good grief. You know how you're supposed to fire automatic weapons in controlled bursts? Of course not. It's because the barrel strays and you have to re-aim. Obviously they weren't that great of marksmen if they couldn't hit a man running in a straight line.

Originally posted by StrawNilla
Either you're not reading my posts or you're out to annoy me.

I said that if Spidey deemed it necessary at a particular time of battle that he could and would rush Batman to the point where he could just KO him. That's not unthinkable and it's not out of character. It Batman doesn't stay down after getting knocked down then Spidey would probably think it best to rush him (depending on the distance between them) and knock him down.

Like I said, let me stick to my method of arguing. If I see something as a part of your argument that would make me think different from Spidey deducting that he should simply rush and KO Batman to end the fight, I'll let you know. Until then, don't tell me that I should think this or that, no offense but that's just not your place.

SPIDER MAN DOESN'T KNOW IF HE NEEDS TO OR NOT HE DOES NOT HAVE THE PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AS TO WHAT THE BLOODY BLUE ****ING HELL BATMAN IS!

Can you read it that time? Or are your reading skill too selective to read even that?

like I said raz wouldn't hire a bunch of untrained goons to do his work....esp in the gamble of the story arch this pic pretains to....unless he was literally retarded....he ain't...

well I guess spidey could bite him like a brown recluse..... 😘

Originally posted by jinzin
like I said raz wouldn't hire a bunch of untrained goons to do his work....esp in the gamble of the story arch this pic pretains to....unless he was literally retarded....he ain't...

If they don't know sustained automatic gunfire leads to inaccuracies and can't hit a man running in a straight line, they can't be that great.

Originally posted by jinzin
well I guess spidey could bite him like a brown recluse..... 😘

I heard that was fake. Both in that it wasn't a brown recluse and that the original picture had the hand in front of the arm of a recliner or something and it was just superimposed over a blurred picture of a hospital table.