Originally posted by Draco69
I don't understand your "question". You clearly don't believe in evolution, so why ask that? And what do you mean by genetic condition? You're not making sense...
You are correct..I don't believe in Neo Darwinism. However I know that you do, so that is why I framed the question using the word "evolve."
You stated that the anus is used for the purpose of excreting waste. Many homosexuals use the anus to engage in sexual acts. The practice of homosexuality has been around for 1000's of years..Correct?
You/others have stated that homosexuality is based on one's genetics. My question to you was..why hasn't the function of the anus "evolved" to accomadate to this "genetic" condition? Perhaps the question should have been phrased differently. Since you are having difficulty understanding what I am asking, try answering the rephrased question below..
Why hasn't the function of the anus evolved into something capable of reproduction?
Real simple question.
Homosexuality hasn't been proven to be a genetic disorder. Why would it would it be considered a disorder as would race/height/eye color? You
The concept of "Race" is actually related to a multitude of factors Draco..not just to one's physical appearence or genetics. Caste systems and Religion..have just as much to do with "race" as genetics do.
However..from a physical/genetic standpoint..many of these differences can be attributed to some sort of environmental benefit. The most obvious example would be an individual's skin color. For example A darker individual..would have more protection from the sun than a lighter individual would. Again. Simple stuff to understand.
perceive it to be a disorder because it doesn't fit your status quo. Ironically enough, homogenuity in nature doesn't exist. I have no idea what the purpose of homosexuality any more than I would know the purpose of race or really big feet.
I don't perceive it to be a disorder, however, Science has not come up with any practical use for homosexuality/lesbianism..other than for sexual gratification. I believe you will find that I am correct about this, unless you are able to provide some examples/theories as to how fellatio, anal sex, vaginal oral sex etc..perform some sort of specific "evolutionary function"
Um. no. You once again making the mistake of equating sexual orientation with sexual position and/or acts. Not to mention you're leaving the poor lesbians out this.
Just added the poor lesbians into it by adding the term "vaginal oral sex"
The purpose of the anus is for excretion.
But people, gay or straight, still use for sex.
So what is the difference between a heterosexual and a homosexual engaging in sodomy/fellatio for sexual purposes? Wouldn't it be just as much of a choice for the hetero as it would for the homo?
The purpose of the mouth is for breathing and ingestion, but again people, gay or straight, still use it for sex. If these sexual actions that are not considered to be the "natural" way than by your definiton heterosexualtiy is also a defunct since many heterosexual people choose to have anal/oral sex.
Refer to the above.
Sexual actions has nothing to do with sexual orientation.
You are correct. The root of both problems stems from personal "choices"..not genetics.