Homosexuality: Chosen or Genetic?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE and edited by whobdamandog

In other words, you cannot explain why the definitions you have posted are correct, and why the definitions I have posted using the same sources are incorrect.

In other words, you cannot refute that sexual orientation is defined by sexual behaviors with members of a particular sex.

In other words, you cannot refute that homosexuality is definitionally a chosen behavior even though it is listed as one in medical dictionaries

If my arguments "have been sorely defeated," then why do you never adress them, and make up foolish reasons as to why they're not valid?

If your arguments are so sound, why have you been unable to answer a single question posed to you challenging your argument?

Attention Members of KMC:

According to ADAM POE, everone who has participated in anal or oral sexual acts with an individual of the same-sex does not choose to do so!!

According to ADAM POE, anyone who has participated in same sex intercourse should put themselves in the same sexual behavioral category as a monkey, dog, horse, or any animal that engages in rectal sex within the animal kingdom!!

Go forth with the new knowledge of your true sexual orientation! Pee on trees!! Chase after cars!! Eat crap and sniff the behinds of your friends!!! Jump through windows when you see your reflection in them!! Human beings don't choose to engage in rectal sex or any of these activities!!! These are natural behaviors that they were born wanting to do!!

Hey look everybody..I can get the last word in too...(at least until someone responds again.)

🙄 😆

Fin

so whob what happening did you choose to announce that you are indeed gay

wow, i've been straight and gay with the same person in one day...
oh, and captain, laser vision is genetic. shooting lasers out of your ass is chosen, usually when you order the super hot habanero salsa on that barbacoa burrito at chipotle

Originally posted by Darth Jello
wow, i've been straight and gay with the same person in one day...
oh, and captain, laser vision is genetic. shooting lasers out of your ass is chosen, usually when you order the super hot habanero salsa on that barbacoa burrito at chipotle

You're purposely misinterpreting what I've stated.

The basis of my argument was that the sexual actions one willfully engages in can be used to define their sexuality. This has been clearly demonstrated by all of the definitions given over the last several pages.

guy + guy sexual intercourse = gay. Usually this is represented by anal sex.

girl + girl sexual intercourse = gay. Usually this is represented by unnatural vaginal sex(coke bottles, spare tires, dildo's etc)

male + female sexual intercourse = straight. Usually this is represented by natural sexual intercourse.(penis + vagina)

Adam Poe, Captain Fantastic and many others, want to exclusively define such behaviors as attractions, so that they can continue to profess such behaviors as being uncontrollable. The only evidence they have to support this silly notion of being genetic, is that animals have been observed engaging in such behaviors in the wild. (Note: Animals also eat crap, jump through windows when they see their reflections, and sniff the behinds of other animals. Does this justify human beings engaging in such behavior as well?)

I've demonstrated that sexuality can indeed be defined by one's actions, to assert that it can indeed be controlled and chosen.

By defining one's sexual attractions as being uncontrollable and inherently ingrained within our genetics at birth, one could justify such perverse crimes like pedophilia, rape, necrophilia, bestiality, and countless others. That's really what the whole genetic argument does in a nutshell. It validates human sexual perversity as being "okay."

The bottom line my friends, is that regardless of what one finds themselves perversely sexually attracted to, they still have a choice to engage/not engage in this perverse sexual behavior.

Fin

guy + guy sexual intercourse = gay. Usually this is represented by anal sex.

girl + girl sexual intercourse = gay. Usually this is represented by unnatural vaginal sex(coke bottles, spare tires, dildo's etc)

male + female sexual intercourse = straight. Usually this is represented by natural sexual intercourse.(penis + vagina)

Basically Whobs point is that
"People arn't allowed to do anything that there body isn't designed todo.."

Cept he can't explain why all men are born with a prostate gland which has the ability to have orgasms only through anal sex... Seems like it was designed for that reason....

Originally posted by whobdamandog
You're purposely misinterpreting what I've stated.

The basis of my argument was that the sexual actions one willfully engages in can be used to define their sexuality. This has been clearly demonstrated by all of the definitions given over the last several pages.

guy + guy sexual intercourse = gay. Usually this is represented by anal sex.

girl + girl sexual intercourse = gay. Usually this is represented by unnatural vaginal sex(coke bottles, spare tires, dildo's etc)

male + female sexual intercourse = straight. Usually this is represented by natural sexual intercourse.(penis + vagina)

Adam Poe, Captain Fantastic and many others, want to exclusively define such behaviors as attractions, so that they can continue to profess such behaviors as being uncontrollable. The only evidence they have to support this silly notion of being genetic, is that animals have been observed engaging in such behaviors in the wild. (Note: Animals also eat crap, jump through windows when they see their reflections, and sniff the behinds of other animals. Does this justify human beings engaging in such behavior as well?)

I've demonstrated that sexuality can indeed be defined by one's actions, to assert that it can indeed be controlled and chosen.

By defining one's sexual attractions as being uncontrollable and inherently ingrained within our genetics at birth, one could justify such perverse crimes like pedophilia, rape, necrophilia, bestiality, and countless others. That's really what the whole genetic argument does in a nutshell. It validates human sexual perversity as being "okay."

The bottom line my friends, is that regardless of what one finds themselves perversely sexually attracted to, they still have a choice to engage/not engage in this perverse sexual behavior.

Fin

Let's do this again, just for posterity.

man+man sex is an ACT of homosexuality. But this act does not mean that both people involved are homosexuals.

man+woman sex is an ACT of heterosexuality. But this act does not mean that both individuals involved are heterosexual.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
The bottom line my friends, is that regardless of what one finds themselves perversely sexually attracted to, they still have a choice to engage/not engage in this perverse sexual behavior.

Ignoring your use of "perversly", no one here is arguing that activity isn't chosen. However, attraction is not. That's not an attraction to an act, that's an attraction with an activity partner.

Again, as people have pointed out to you (ad nauseam, ad infinitum, ad ihre ewige absurdität ) did you choose to be attracted to females? Did you choose NOT to be attracted to pedophilia?(unless you are of course) Did you choose to be attracted to your obsession with ANAL sex?

"ad ihre ewige absurdität"...haha...that's awesome....

yeah, made that one up myself.

If homosexuality is natural, why pedophilia shouldn´t be natural too ?

Whob has argued that point for quite a while. I think the most obvious response would be the reason behind such attractions. Power and revenge is typically the motivating factor behind adult on baby sex.

Originally posted by Atlantis001
If homosexuality is natural, why pedophilia shouldn´t be natural too ?

Who claimed something different?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Who claimed something different?

I do, for one.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
I do, for one.

Wow......why?

Originally posted by Atlantis001
If homosexuality is natural, why pedophilia shouldn´t be natural too ?

Homosexuality is not connected to any illness.

I can't believe some people actually try and connect these completely different items.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Pedophilia is associated with mental illness and cannot be considered natural for that reason.

Homosexuality is not connected to any illness.

I can't believe some people actually try and connect these completely different items.

Oh well...but why are mental illnesses not natural.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh well...but since when are mental illnesses not natural.....

Originally posted by StyleTime
The behavior is brought about by external influences like being molested as a child.

Hmm, I am not sure if that's all to it. I don't see why it can't be a genetic preference as well.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Hmm, I am not sure if that's all to it. I don't see why it can't be a genetic preference as well.

Is that because you do not see the genetic factor behind homosexuality?

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Is that because you do not see the genetic factor behind homosexuality?

No, I thinlk homosexuality is genetic. Well it can probably be influenced by other things as well, but basically genetic. I just don't see why Paedophilia shouldn't be. Now, I am not saying that Paedophilia should be accepted and that it is like Homosexuality...just that it might have similar causes (similar to heterosexuality as well, idf I may add that)