Originally posted by lord xyz
Hard to explain but yes I think.
Much like "hardwood" and "softwood".
Homophobe comes from Homophobia, which means scared* of homosexuality.
*irrational fear, aversion or discrimination
Damn you, they are not stupid! Oak is hard compared to Balsa relatively speaking. Didn't you ever take Wood Shop in highschool?
I'm not gay so I really can't answer this question with accuracy. But I feel everyone has a chose. Some chose to be gay some don't. So I feel it is a chose, although getting feminine genetics doesn't help. I was born manly good at sports, strong, hairy, deep voice, and I like the bagina, but If I was born poor at sports, weak, not hariy, high voice with a lisp, and ran and threw like a girl then I would have a greater chance of becoming gay but it would still ultimately be my chose to become gay.
But I'm not gay so I really don't know maybe I'm wrong.
Originally posted by RobtardThen an anti-gay is different.
Homophobe comes from Homophobia, which means scared* of homosexuality.*irrational fear, aversion or discrimination
Damn you, they are not stupid! Oak is hard compared to Balsa relatively speaking. Didn't you ever take Wood Shop in highschool?
No. But I know that hardwood is wood from a disiduous tree, and softwood is wood from a coniferous tree.
I think that it is absolutely ridiculous to presume that any homosexual has had a choice in the matter.
Why on Earth would anyone willingly embrace a lifestyle that lends itself to ostracization, ridicule, and discrimination? (This, of course, is in a different context than religion.) Why on Earth would anyone choose to be attracted to someone of the same sex when the opposite sex would do just as well?
I'm sure we've all heard of stories about gay teenagers who were thrown out of their houses when they came out--why would anyone choose that?
Supposing that homosexuality was, in fact, a choice, it would certainly be some unconscious choice that involved some form of deep emotional/psychological trauma--thus, not really a choice at all. (The mind would "choose" not to be attracted to the opposite sex, but the individual would have no actual say in the matter.) And what about all the homosexuals who haven't suffered some form of deep emotional/psychological trauma?
I believe that, in some cases, trauma could be the cause of homosexuality. Stranger things have happened. But that would be a rare case, the majority of homosexuals being gay due to genetic alteration (or hormonal imbalance in the womb or whatever other theories are out there, though I'm partial to genetics myself).
Originally posted by FeceMan
I think that it is absolutely ridiculous to presume that any homosexual has had a choice in the matter.Why on Earth would anyone willingly embrace a lifestyle that lends itself to ostracization, ridicule, and discrimination? (This, of course, is in a different context than religion.) Why on Earth would anyone choose to be attracted to someone of the same sex when the opposite sex would do just as well?
I'm sure we've all heard of stories about gay teenagers who were thrown out of their houses when they came out--why would anyone choose that?
Supposing that homosexuality was, in fact, a choice, it would certainly be some unconscious choice that involved some form of deep emotional/psychological trauma--thus, not really a choice at all. (The mind would "choose" not to be attracted to the opposite sex, but the individual would have no actual say in the matter.) And what about all the homosexuals who haven't suffered some form of deep emotional/psychological trauma?
I believe that, in some cases, trauma could be the cause of homosexuality. Stranger things have happened. But that would be a rare case, the majority of homosexuals being gay due to genetic alteration (or hormonal imbalance in the womb or whatever other theories are out there, though I'm partial to genetics myself).
Some people like to be the outcast; some people can’t help but be the victim. I knew a girl who choose to stay with her boy friend who beat her for 7 years, she then choose to be a lesbian after that. Some people choose death over life. People choose some crazy ass paths in life that no one understands sometime not even themselves, but that doesn’t change the fact that its there choose.
But as I said before I’m not gay so this but I could be if I made the chose to.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
Some people like to be the outcast;
Homosexuals don't like being outcasts...that's why they're fighting for equal rights. If they liked being outcasts they wouldn't lobby for gay rights and equality...because being an outcast means being apart from conventional society...which is the exact opposite of what homosexuals want....
Originally posted by dirkdirden
I knew a girl who choose to stay with her boy friend who beat her for 7 years, she then choose to be a lesbian after that.
Here's a clue:
She's not really a lesbian. She's a person with personal problems and feels wronged by men. She's choosing to PRETEND to be lesbian to avoid intimacy with men.
She's still straight.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
Some people choose death over life.
You can't will your body to die...
Your sexual attractions cannot be chosen. That funny feeling you get when you see a naked girl is not a conscious choice.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
But as I said before I’m not gay so this but I could be if I made the chose to.
Do it. Right now.
Somehow you possess the ability to alter your sexual attractions. You can apparently alter your entire hormonal system to be attracted to either gender you choose.
So do it. Make yourself homosexual and "choose" to be sexually attracted to men.
Apparently you'r e some kinda genie.....
Originally posted by dirkdirden
Some people like to be the outcast; some people can’t help but be the victim. I knew a girl who choose to stay with her boy friend who beat her for 7 years, she then choose to be a lesbian after that. Some people choose death over life. People choose some crazy ass paths in life that no one understands sometime not even themselves, but that doesn’t change the fact that its there choose.But as I said before I’m not gay so this but I could be if I made the chose to.
You honestly think you could just choose to be attracted to men if you wanted? Like turning on a light switch.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
Some people like to be the outcast; some people can’t help but be the victim. I knew a girl who choose to stay with her boy friend who beat her for 7 years, she then choose to be a lesbian after that. Some people choose death over life. People choose some crazy ass paths in life that no one understands sometime not even themselves, but that doesn’t change the fact that its there choose.But as I said before I’m not gay so this but I could be if I made the chose to.
Then you are partly gay.
You can't choose your attractions. They are just there.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
I'm not gay so I really can't answer this question with accuracy.
You're answering it with zero accuracy.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
But I feel everyone has a chose.
You can choose to ACT on your sexual desires or sexual attractions but you cannot choose to HAVE them. It's impossible.
It's like choosing NOT to be hungry or stopping the beat of your heart whenever you feel like it.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
So I feel it is a chose, although getting feminine genetics doesn't help.
????
"Feminine" genetics doesn't have anything to do with it. There's no such thing.....
Originally posted by dirkdirden
I was born manly good at sports, strong, hairy, deep voice, and I like the bagina, but If I was born poor at sports, weak, not hariy, high voice with a lisp, and ran and threw like a girl
And now you're playing into stereotypes.
Since gays are obviously feminine and girly....
Blacks are stupid. They're lazy. They're very violent. And they smell.
They're obviously an inferior species because all blacks aren't very intelligent, they're very promiscious, they do drugs and they can only do manual labor.
One stereotype to another....
Originally posted by dirkdirden
then I would have a greater chance of becoming gay but it would still ultimately be my chose to become gay.
This makes no sense at all....
You mean if I don't play American football, I'm gonna be gay?
I had no idea that all it took was some hamburgers and pigskin ball to make a person straight....
Originally posted by dirkdirden
But I'm not gay so I really don't know maybe I'm wrong.
No. But you're straight.
Question: Can you or can you not choose your sexual desires/attractions to women?
NO....
wow out chill angry people.
There is feminine genetics you can take 2 boys who both have never thrown a ball in there life. One can throw it like a girl the other can throw it like a man. Small facial pours in a feminine gene. There are a ton of famine genes and masculine genes.
The stereo types don't make them self’s up
In nature a naked woman shouldn't turn a man on, but thought our society we associate a naked woman with sex. You can associate a naked man with sex and become attracted to men just as easily. Sexuality can be altered by conditioning. A good example of that conditioning would be a venerator. Women who use a venerator often will associate the sound of the venerator with clitoral stimulation so when they hear the vibrations they will become aroused with even using it, but women who don’t use a venerator will feel nothing.
So if I truly wanted to I could become gay it would be hard now that I have already conditioned my self to be strait but it could be done. And if as a youngster I was conditioned to be gay I could condition myself to be strait.
This is what I was told in psychology and sociology, and some of it from personal experience. I can’t elaborate it any better because I have a meeting to go to but there is substantial evidence that it is a conditioned decision not genetic you can google it if you feel like it.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
wow out chill angry people.There is feminine genetics you can take 2 boys who both have never thrown a ball in there life. One can throw it like a girl the other can throw it like a man. Small facial pours in a feminine gene. There are a ton of famine genes and masculine genes.
The stereo types don't make them self’s up
In nature a naked woman shouldn't turn a man on, but thought our society we associate a naked woman with sex. You can associate a naked man with sex and become attracted to men just as easily. Sexuality can be altered by conditioning. A good example of that conditioning would be a venerator. Women who use a venerator often will associate the sound of the venerator with clitoral stimulation so when they hear the vibrations they will become aroused with even using it, but women who don’t use a venerator will feel nothing.
So if I truly wanted to I could become gay it would be hard now that I have already conditioned my self to be strait but it could be done. And if as a youngster I was conditioned to be gay I could condition myself to be strait.
This is what I was told in psychology and sociology, and some of it from personal experience. I can’t elaborate it any better because I have a meeting to go to but there is substantial evidence that it is a conditioned decision not genetic you can google it if you feel like it.
No one is angry, but you're spreading nonsense... Think of the kids.
"In nature a naked woman shouldn't turn a man" Ahh, yea, a naked woman should turn a man on, it's called sexuality/procreation. If the sexes were not naturally "turned on" by each other, we would have gone extinct or never existed to begin with.
"So if I truly wanted to I could become gay it would be hard now that I have already conditioned my self to be strait but it could be done." If you're correct, then it would stand to reason that everyone is born with a 'neutral sexuality' and outside forces sway us to our attractions. It can't be so though, like I mentioned above, sexual attraction is an inborn aspect, otherwise we wouldn't exist.
Not to make it personal, but if you really feel you could just "turn" yourself and be genuinely attracted to men sexually, I seriously think this is an issue you have and not something to be blanketed on others.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
wow out chill angry people.There is feminine genetics you can take 2 boys who both have never thrown a ball in there life. One can throw it like a girl the other can throw it like a man. Small facial pours in a feminine gene. There are a ton of famine genes and masculine genes.
The stereo types don't make them self’s up
In nature a naked woman shouldn't turn a man on, but thought our society we associate a naked woman with sex. You can associate a naked man with sex and become attracted to men just as easily. Sexuality can be altered by conditioning. A good example of that conditioning would be a venerator. Women who use a venerator often will associate the sound of the venerator with clitoral stimulation so when they hear the vibrations they will become aroused with even using it, but women who don’t use a venerator will feel nothing.
So if I truly wanted to I could become gay it would be hard now that I have already conditioned my self to be strait but it could be done. And if as a youngster I was conditioned to be gay I could condition myself to be strait.
This is what I was told in psychology and sociology, and some of it from personal experience. I can’t elaborate it any better because I have a meeting to go to but there is substantial evidence that it is a conditioned decision not genetic you can google it if you feel like it.
What in the hell is that.
I'm not even putting a question mark on those two sentences because they would be delivered in such a deadpan fashion that you'd think I was making a statement.
Because that drivel you just posted made me dumber. You, sir, are the Jackie Malfoy of long posts.
Originally posted by dirkdirden
wow out chill angry people.There is feminine genetics you can take 2 boys who both have never thrown a ball in there life. One can throw it like a girl the other can throw it like a man. Small facial pours in a feminine gene. There are a ton of famine genes and masculine genes.
The stereo types don't make them self’s up
In nature a naked woman shouldn't turn a man on, but thought our society we associate a naked woman with sex. You can associate a naked man with sex and become attracted to men just as easily. Sexuality can be altered by conditioning. A good example of that conditioning would be a venerator. Women who use a venerator often will associate the sound of the venerator with clitoral stimulation so when they hear the vibrations they will become aroused with even using it, but women who don’t use a venerator will feel nothing.
So if I truly wanted to I could become gay it would be hard now that I have already conditioned my self to be strait but it could be done. And if as a youngster I was conditioned to be gay I could condition myself to be strait.
This is what I was told in psychology and sociology, and some of it from personal experience. I can’t elaborate it any better because I have a meeting to go to but there is substantial evidence that it is a conditioned decision not genetic you can google it if you feel like it.
Bullshit.