Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
so i want to do you, you want to do bardock, and bardock wants to do AC?
AC's hot.
But that is not what he is saying. He says all people (most at least) have sexual urges and we all formed preferences some prefer women (and particular types of women), some men, some don't have a preference as to gender.
Originally posted by lord xyz
There's no such thing as hetrosexual and homosexual. We all want to **** eachother, but some things can affect our preferences.
If you look at spectrum of sexualities...I think you'll find that more people are towards the middle than you realized. The "bisexual" area.
Now, what xyz means when he says "we all want to **** eachother," note the clarifier of "preferences". You can still have taste.
Originally posted by Rogue JediThe key word is preferences.
i did read the whole post. i am interpretting it as it should be.
Originally posted by AllianceI think that is true, more people are bisexual than anything else. I myself am slightly bisexual, I prefer women, but for some reason, male sex can get me going, not all the time, but sometimes...
If you look at spectrum of sexualities...I think you'll find that more people are towards the middle than you realized. The "bisexual" area.Now, what xyz means when he says "we all want to **** eachother," note the clarifier of "preferences". You can still have taste.
Originally posted by Regret
Spout all the crap you will, the evidence is not present, and the fully explored subject results in the APA's statement:"...sexual orientation is most likely the result of a complex interaction of environmental, cognitive and biological factors."
Professionals have and are studying the topic, evidence presented here is irrelevant, currently the overall proper stance is the statement above. So, no, I have not read the entire thread, nor do I intend to.
I entered this thread because Urizen approached me with your post through PM, and I believed it best to allow you access to my response. I am partially discussing this because there are some here, yourself included, that claim something that is currently untrue and cite various aspects of my professional vocation to support your false claims. I do, for a fact, continue to post because people respond to my posts contradicting or attacking my statements, and somehow this has a reinforcing effect on me.
Okay, so you didn't say that homosexuality is a learned behavior but that you are immune from learning it, considering your age?
And if you are so well qualified to address the subject, then you better than any of us should be able to cite us a few examples of how it's learned. And if it's learned, then it has to be taught somehow.
I could care less why you post. The fact remains, you continue to post your opinion. An opinion that, cherry-picked as it is from the published information from all your sources, is considered an invalid opinion by the very source to which you refer. If you are, convieniently and quite suddenly, a member of these groups then you should know better than the rest of us how invalid is your own opinion.
There are quite a few different levels of membership for the APA. Are you absolutely certain you know how the organization works?
And what's worse, is that you have already stated in this thread that you have no intention of looking at the subject from a different perspective. You have started posting during the 11th hour in this thread so far, and have clearly stated that you don't NEED to read through it. That's not quite the open-minded nature of someone who considers themselves so well read on every subject they address, much less a member of the APA.
Basically, you've lied about your credentials. You've been less than forth-coming about WHY you're so rooted in your opinion and unwilling to be more open-minded about the subject. And you've been posting your opinion as fact and then backed it up with quotes from reputable sources that you've edited to suit your argument.