Originally posted by Deadline
I tell you what how about you actually go to p155 and read what I said. I actually put my post below.
don't be arrogant, you know for a fact I read your post
Originally posted by Deadline
You are now trolling. All those points have been dealt with.
well, not really
you made a great post about Captain America, but the point is, we are talking about Wolverine.
One would first have to prove that Wolverine is susceptible to pressure points before we would discuss if Cap could exploit them for the win.
I agree with you, IF pressure points were a reliable tactic for harming wolverine, then Cap should be able to do it. However, that conclusion is dependent on the clause, "if they are a reliable tactic"
its like, say I have a wall that can't be broken. You say "I could break it, look at these other walls I've broken", but those other walls are irrelevant, because they don't share the same property of "unbreakability" as my wall. We would have to prove my wall is breakable before we could say you could break it, even if it is likely you could break any breakable wall.