Bakerboy and Mr. Parker(the "Man-Spider" twins) why do you call Spder-Man Man-Spider? Is it the webbing? If so, why don't you complain about the symbiote costume? That Spider-Man had webbing made from Peter's body, so why not have it a new power? It seems a lot easier than having to make another dose every time. And Kilmer was alright. But Keaton was better, case closed. Only 3 people like Kilmer's portrail(unless you count Yaya, who likes them all except Clooney who I think did ok, not great, and not terrible, but ok)And I think this debate was over a long time ago, it's 4 to 3(in favor of Keaton) so, think of this as a message from Keaton, "You lose."
Yes batdude,he is a man-spider now and not spider-man anymore because of the webbing since he is a damn monster now .Im not going to get into it with you here though since this is the batman section .the spiderman section is the place for that.and your right batdude you lose,you two guys have been disproven so many times on this thread with your wild theorys its laughable and not even worth explaining to you anymore.just because the numbers are fewer that dont prove diddly duh. 🙄 the fact that there are thousands out there though as I have pointed out to you so many tiimes before who hated keaton for the role,DOES prove he was a horrible choice.
thats just being plain ignorant,the net doesnt account for everybody out there who hates keaton as batman. if you tell me you havent run into people in your life who hated keaton because of how physically wrong he was for the role,Ii dont believe a word of it because I have run into dozens of them over the years and I know bakerboy has as well.we tried to point that out to you earlier.Once again the NET DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EVERYBODY OUT THERE.
first of all, dont you dare call me ignorant, you dont know the meaning of the word.
fact is you lost this debate a long time ago, because you couldn't structure a decent argument, and your still going on about dustin hoffman? can't you read? i explained that a long time ago...
and every batman fan i met before kmc loved keaton... i never said the net counted for anything, my opinion of keaton is my own, i just happen to share it with a lot of people. but hey, you dont have to believe it... denial isnt just a river in egypt...
Mr. Parker, I would expect this from someone who cares too much about apperances and not enough about the portrail and plot(the BATMAN 89 plot was great!)Kilmer was ok, just get over with it like I am(but still Keaton did the best Batman, Kilmer did best Bruce though) P.S. The people you meet don't account for everyone out there! Just like the internet, the people you personally meet don't account for the rest of us! Let's just get back on topic(where West is in it) And I think that Keaton would have been extremely good if he was voice of Batman in an animated series(where appearances don't count) Did you hear when he said, "I am Batman." to the two thugs? That is what Batman animated needs, a dark voice. And in Batman 66 and btas, wouldn't people recongize voices? I mean Bruce and Batman sounded the same in those two programs! And just because someone is black doesn't mean they can't be Batman. That's racism!
ok, about a black batman, if he(whoever they get at hypothetically) is the best choice for the job, then great. but if u have a black guy and a white guy who are equal... i'd pick the white guy because bruce is white in the comics, its not racist, its a fact... if bishop is in x3, then i'll pick a black guy. picking someone of a minority just to be pc is wrong, you have to pick the best guy who fits the role...
i loved the bats 89 story...