Originally posted by Creshosk
Your strawman arguments are ridiculous. You exagerate our claims and then debate those leaving our actual arguments alone:One entry found for straw man.
Main Entry: straw man
Function: noun
1 : a weak or imaginary opposition (as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted
2 : a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction
lol..well you learn something new everday.. 🙄
Anyway...let me define a word for you...one which you don't seem to understand..
Main Entry: discontinuity("non-continuity" in lamans terms)
Function: noun
definition: A break or gap..
I don't think you get the fact that this is an non - continuity based scenario. Meaning that this scenario is discontinous with what has happened in the comic book world. I believe this was made quite obvious from the beginning of this thread, seeing as how 3 of the combatants..rarely go for the kill or use the full extent of their abilities in normal comic book "continuity"...vous comprenz?
This shows that you didn't even understand the reaon why those examples were shown in the first place.
I understood..but those "examples" have been easily rebutted on multiple occasions by siting similar logic(ie Spidey beat Red Skull, Spidey beat Sabretooth, Spidey defeated the X-men..Spidey webbed up Wolverine with the slightest of ease..) Arguing like this creates a rather circular debate..which as you can see..is almost impossible to bring to the point of closure.
Spiderman was hypnotized. thus not fighting in character, thus not holding back.
Moot point....he was kind of like a zombie..not really in control of his actions/movements..etc. If he had been using his webbing, agility, speed, spider sense, tactical skill etc..it would have been a bloodbath..he wasn't doing so in this particular story however...
I guess the only way that spiderman can win is by discarding things that have happened, Multiple times, being powered up or depowering his opponents.
Or by handling them in the same way that he handled the X-men, Sinister Six, Syndicate Sinister, Avengers, Fantastic Four, Hulk, Firelord, Sabretooth, Red Skull, X factor, Superboy, Iron Man 2020, Sentinel, Morlun, etc..etc..etc..etc...as I said...that type of argument is a circular one and is very easily rebutted...
What's more likely to be a ridiculous argument?
Well all of the arguments you Trio supporters have given have been pretty ridiculous..however some have just been more ridiculous than others...I'm still waiting for a logical scenario as to how the Trio would pull this off..
It is you who can't handle the truth, so you must discard it, pick and choose what suits you or invent your own.
The truth is that you have done nothing to provide anyone on this thread with a "logical" explanation as to why they would win based on the stipulations of this "non - continuity" based scenario..and no amount of Wolvie scratched Spidey one time, DD has taken shots from the Hulk, or Cap doesn't tire arguments are going to convince me otherwise...