Originally posted by Mr Zero
In a situation where you can’t tell the fighters from the civilians where does that leave you?In your amoral murder – fest outlined above where no “rules” of conduct apply and it’s just “murder the enemy” I’m assuming you are aware that – since certain groups consider all Americans the enemy that your advocating terrorism. Next time a plane flys into a scyscraper I expect you to shrug and say “It's kill or be killed, there is no morals.” If not, please explain to me how your definition of “enemy” (a native of the area, not a trained soldier, resisting an invasion by a foreign power) is valid and defensible but someone who decides all Americans are the enemy of Allah is to be convinced they are mistaken and should play by “the rules” as defined by you.
Lack of training doesn't make a soldier any less of a soldier, and THAT'S the enemy. The soldiers are the opposing hostile forces. Iraqi civilians that aren't hostile aren't the enemy. The second a civilian whips out a gun and starts firing at our troops, he isn't a civilian anymore, he's an enemy soldier and a target, and should be neutralized immediately. The planes flying into a skyscraper was NOT WAR, which is what I'm addressing.
The rules as defined by me? You won't catch me making any rules to war, there shouldn't be any rules other than the common sense "don't kill non-hostile civilains".
And Lil B: You said the war you lived through ended 15 years ago? Which would make you 4 years old at the time? And that makes you an expert? Are you serious? Unless you held a rifle in your hands and ran into battle, you aren't in any position to act the way you are acting. And if you have run into battle, then consider my remarks void, and accept my apologies.
And all of you arguing against me make it sound as if I condone the ****ing war in the first place, which I don't. I do condone that in war "the end justifies the means". When the objective is to kill every hostile opponent, there is no room for morals. The war never should have started, but it did anyway, and now the objective is not to look back and say "Oh this war is unnecessary and an atrocity. These troops shouldn't be doing these things. We should be acting better than that", but to say "What can we do to win?"