@bardock42:
im not german 😉 im errm something else 😛
....many people believe in this theory that something has started the big bang and the evolution process..... a thing like god?? a thing has to be able to think i guess or else it wont be able to start the big bang and... everything thats able to think is called an individual... but the definition of god is only a individual (with or without a body or something we can perceive at all) ... so thatd be a god...!? did i get you wrong?
Originally posted by DuronKillerChemical reactions, my friend.
im not german 😉 im errm something else 😛
....many people believe in this theory that something has started the big bang and the evolution process..... a thing like god?? a thing has to be able to think i guess or else it wont be able to start the big bang and... everything thats able to think is called an individual... but the definition of god is only a individual (with or without a body or something we can perceive at all) ... so thatd be a god...!? did i get you wrong?
Originally posted by jango fatt
Well said .And evolution can be proved.Like:
Early ancestors.Sahelanthropis.
australopithecus ramidus.
Australopithecus anamesis;
australophitecus Afarensis (Lucy)
australopithecus Africanus.They all extincted.Thus evolution.And they evolved in the family of the homonidae.
and then you have like whole family's that extincted.
Like paranthropus boisei and robustus;
And the first homonids: homo habilis
homo rudolfensisand then you have the advanced homonids: homo Ergaster,
homo erectus , homo heidelbergensis, homo neanderthalensis,homo sapiens,homo sapiens sapiens.They all evolved.To us: homo sapiens sapiens.(well not all).
i know the nomenclature.... but where is the proof in it?? names dont give any proof!
well... they found skeletons... but compare the head of a primate with a human one.... and think about how many species die a day..... sure there were more species but the evolution is not proofed! thats why its called a theory 😉 😛 a theory is an attempt of an explanation about a thing... not a fact at all....
Originally posted by DuronKillerThe fact that they extincted is a proof of evolution.and they evolved, another proof.The weaker die and the strong live on.
i know the nomenclature.... but where is the proof in it?? names dont give any proof!
well... they found skeletons... but compare the head of a primate with a human one.... and think about how many species die a day..... sure there were more species but the evolution is not proofed! thats why its called a theory 😉 😛 a theory is an attempt of an explanation about a thing... not a fact at all....
Originally posted by Bardock42
You got me wrong
it didn't start it the problem is there must have been something before the Big Bang, like some Soup thatthere could be any Explosion in the first place.
oh ok sorry! well my base thought was that most of the eminently respectable scientists say that it definitely cant have been an accident, but explicit manipulated by something (mighty above the rules of science)
i thought you agreed with me (and many scientists) at this point.....
ok... if there was some soup, where did it come from?
Originally posted by jango fatt
The fact that they extincted is a proof of evolution.and they evolved, another proof.The weaker die and the strong live on.
ok.... but.... extinction is no proof of evolution.... extinction doesnt say that a new species will be created... it only says that it dies... no proof where the species comes from.... only that it dies.... wheres the evolution? you cant proof a theory with the parts of a result of it.... it just wouldnt be called evolution theory if there was any proof.
who said that they evolved? maybe they were all the time vaguely the same... and the fact that the weaker die and the stronger live on is no proof either.....
Originally posted by DuronKillerDid you ever read the evolution theory? it clearly state's that extinction is a proof of evolution.And it is.If god would exist he would have made some new animals of that species.And why would God make one cell organisms? and why do you need to .... to have a shild.If god can make them.
i know the nomenclature.... but where is the proof in it?? names dont give any proof!
well... they found skeletons... but compare the head of a primate with a human one.... and think about how many species die a day..... sure there were more species but the evolution is not proofed! thats why its called a theory 😉 😛 a theory is an attempt of an explanation about a thing... not a fact at all....
Originally posted by jango fatt
Did you ever read the evolution theory? it clearly state's that extinction is a proof of evolution.And it is.If god would exist he would have made some new animals of that species.And why would God make one cell organisms? and why do you need to .... to have a shild.If god can make them.
@bardock42: ok thatd make a sense altogether.....
(now to the original- or base-question: who created the godlike thing 😄 ?)
I just think the various religions trivialize their "gods." I mean, thanking "god" just because your team won a sporting contest, as many born-again athletes do today? Would the creator of all the universe, as the believers claim, really care who won a football game pitting, say, the Oakland Raiders versus the Indianapolis Colts? I'm reminded of what former Indiana basketball coach Bobby Knight had to say on the subject. "God must have really been pissed off at Texas today because we kicked the hell out of them!" Bardock42, what's the general feeling in Germany these days concerning God and religion? Germany has produced a number of Nobel Prize winners in physics, chemistry, etc. Are the people more science-oriented?
well no one knows for sure. because to get an answer would be to die then you cant really tell people if your dead. so all of these gods are just the different peoples interpretation of their own ultimate being to create some sort of hypothesis for the meaning of life. its just the easy way out really.