Halo 3

All of that post was a debate against me, not even my posts.

Here is the original concept of debate: Halo 3's graphics Vs Bioshock's graphics, ok? THAT is the main reason you posted ANY PICTURES in the first place, ok? Remember that? YOU were arguing that Halo 3's graphics were better than Bioshock's.

Now, I'm not going to continue discussing what pics you posted originally or not, I'm not the one "moaning" about it for next ten pages, you are. I'm comfortable enough to drop it, knowing I'm right. You are the one trying to get people to believe you. I'd much rather focus on the original debate, in a civil manner.

Let's look at the pics you just posted, shall we? Ok, so what? Good graphics. Do you want a medal? They are not better than Bioshock's, because Halo 3 is widely recognised as the graphically inferior game of the two, by everyone except idiots, even people who prefer Halo's graphical STYLE, still admit that it's graphics are not as advanced or powerful as Halo's. They are not precisely what you see in game, I know this because I've seen Halo 3 being played on top of the line technology, and it doesn't look as good as those pictures. People here either agree with me, or refrain from commenting. Nobody here is silly enough to actually say Halo has better technical graphics.

So your initial debate of Halo's being better, is wrong. Ergo, you are wrong. That was the initial debate, that was why you lost. If you wish to try and cover your tracks by campaigning about the old links, then do so, but it proves my point.

-AC

What about them plasma grenades, pretty sweet huh?

😐

its really not that important.. what they really need to do is fix the stupid shit that happens in multiplayer

What people need to do is listen to me when I tell them to stop.

Originally posted by Lana
What people need to do is [b]listen to me when I tell them to stop. [/B]

Originally posted by Lana
What people need to do is [b]listen to me when I tell them to stop. [/B]

Use your anger! hehe star wars had to come in this forum at least once!

Anyways...those spike grenades are sweet...whenever I pick one up, I switch immediately...and the flamethrower is nice too...if only you had more mobility...oh well, the price to pay for burning things.

Originally posted by General G
Use your anger!

Originally posted by Lana
What people need to do is [b]listen to me when I tell them to stop. [/B]

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
All of that post was a debate against me, not even my posts.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Here is the original concept of debate: Halo 3's graphics Vs Bioshock's graphics, ok? THAT is the main reason you posted ANY PICTURES in the first place, ok? Remember that? YOU were arguing that Halo 3's graphics were better than Bioshock's.

The closest thing I've done to that, was ask someone to post a picture from Bioshock more detailed than the ones I've posted of Halo 3.

The debate steered since the point you said the scans I posted were not scans of gameplay, even though everyone who's experienced Halo 3 before (General G, Superboy Prime, and myself) can acknowledge those pictures are scans taken from gameplay.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Now, I'm not going to continue discussing what pics you posted originally or not, I'm not the one "moaning" about it for next ten pages, you are. I'm comfortable enough to drop it, knowing I'm right. You are the one trying to get people to believe you. I'd much rather focus on the original debate, in a civil manner.

No proof that I posted different pictures, or anything being close to enough proof besides the statement, "I know and you know the truth." If the post showed signs of editing, you would have something, though not enough proof of your claim regardless.

to someone else (me) who has:

Not only linked to the original post, but the post by you, in which you quoted the original post, the quoted post being exactly like the original one, not containing different pictures, or having signs of editing. The fact you quoted a post with pictures no different than the ones in the original post shows not only were you lying in the first place, but that it's clear I posted nothing you're saying I posted and you're pulling out crap from your rear.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Let's look at the pics you just posted, shall we? Ok, so what? Good graphics. Do you want a medal? They are not better than Bioshock's, because Halo 3 is widely recognised as the graphically inferior game of the two, by everyone except idiots, even people who prefer Halo's graphical STYLE, still admit that it's graphics are not as advanced or powerful as Halo's. They are not precisely what you see in game, I know this because I've seen Halo 3 being played on top of the line technology, and it doesn't look as good as those pictures. People here either agree with me, or refrain from commenting. Nobody here is silly enough to actually say Halo has better technical graphics.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So your initial debate of Halo's being better, is wrong. Ergo, you are wrong. That was the initial debate, that was why you lost. If you wish to try and cover your tracks by campaigning about the old links, then do so, but it proves my point.

Graphicswise it depends on system, put Bioshock on PC and it>>>Console graphics but ime not sure, is Halo 3 on PC yet?

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
Why are you still assuming this, despite that I never claimed or implied that Halo 3's visuals are better?

The closest thing I've done to that, was ask someone to post a picture from Bioshock more detailed than the ones I've posted of Halo 3.

The debate steered since the point you said the scans I posted were not scans of gameplay, even though everyone who's experienced Halo 3 before (General G, Superboy Prime, and myself) can acknowledge those pictures are scans taken from gameplay.

I was in a debate with Newjak over what game had superior graphics. I posted hi-res pics of Bioshock and Halo 3, in-game, first person pictures. The difference was clear.

You came in and tried arguing that Halo 3's were better based on promo shots and trailer pictures. Not in-game, first person shots.

How can you tell me I rely on other people when you have to quote folks that agree with you? BackFire, Lana and Satsujin agree with me, so do others if you actually browse the thread, even those who prefer Halo as a game. Even the site that game Halo the win of what the better game is, they all recognise Bioshock has the graphical edge. You think that because YOU disagree, you have an argument?

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
No proof that I posted different pictures, or anything being close to enough proof besides the statement, "I know and you know the truth." If the post showed signs of editing, you would have something, though not enough proof of your claim regardless.

Why keep bringing it up if you're innocent? Sounds like you're just trying to convince people now. The sign of a guilty man. I'm just resting on the fact that neither of us has proof, and you tried altering a quote.

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
to someone else (me) who has:

Not only linked to the original post

The original post has links that do not work, you quoted it and posted new links. There's a difference. If I go and grab the link to the page with that original post, people can click that, click the links and see they do not work.

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
but the post by you, in which you quoted the original post, the quoted post being exactly like the original one, not containing different pictures, or having signs of editing.

The signs of editing is the fact that on the original post the links are broken and deleted, on the "new" one, they are new links and they work. Why? Because when you quoted it, you edited the links. This is fact, it could not happen any other way, and all the proof is against you.

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
The fact you quoted a post with pictures no different than the ones in the original post shows not only were you lying in the first place, but that it's clear I posted nothing you're saying I posted and you're pulling out crap from your rear.

Better chill out, you're oddly annoyed for an innocent man.

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
And I never said that I was going to deny Bioshock's superiority in the graphics department. I asked for graphic specs of both games (obviously they tell which game has the higher graphics) that you said you have, but all you want to do is tell me Bioshock's visuals are better and that everyone agrees. I've not argued otherwise other than in your mind for some reason.

Go to the bottom of the page, type my name in Search by User. Find it.

Originally posted by Wandering Flame
Considering that you can't even quote a single post where I've said Halo 3's graphics are better, so here we have more topic waste. Do you remember what you said about the stupid things that fanboys do? You know, things such as saying someone said something despite him never saying it, or making false assumptions? That's what you're doing right now my friend, saying I've argued Halo 3's graphics are better than that of a game you like. barker

So you openly admit Halo 3's graphics are inferior to Bioshock's?

-AC

They are 😐

Why is this still going on?

Anybody else heard of the new update they are doing for Halo 3 soon?

Nope. Is it an important update, or are they just fixing slight glitches or something?

They are mainly fixing glitches...including the elite Commando shoulders...they didn't unlock for many people...including me, so they will be making them available to everyone, whether they got the achievement or not...as well as addressing the melee, don't know what they are doing with it though...

Hopefully it won't make people fly like a thousand feet in the opposite direction.

Also, hopefully if you actually attack someone first you'll live not die.

indeed...

what else do you think needs fixing besides melee? I think they need to tweak the head hitboxes... shootin someone in the shoulder and gettin a headshot is just goddamn stupid.... 😐

Glad to hear about this.

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
Hopefully it won't make people fly like a thousand feet in the opposite direction.

Also, hopefully if you actually attack someone first you'll live not die.

Wait, wait, wait! You don't like the flying dead bodies when they get meleed every once in a while?! That always made me laugh...

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I was in a debate with Newjak over what game had superior graphics. I posted hi-res pics of Bioshock and Halo 3, in-game, first person pictures. The difference was clear. You came in and tried arguing that Halo 3's were better based on promo shots and trailer pictures. Not in-game, first person shots. How can you tell me I rely on other people when you have to quote folks that agree with you? BackFire, Lana and Satsujin agree with me, so do others if you actually browse the thread, even those who prefer Halo as a game. Even the site that game Halo the win of what the better game is, they all recognise Bioshock has the graphical edge. You think that because YOU disagree, you have an argument?

And when did I "quote" people who agree with me?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why keep bringing it up if you're innocent? Sounds like you're just trying to convince people now. The sign of a guilty man. I'm just resting on the fact that neither of us has proof, and you tried altering a quote. The original post has links that do not work, you quoted it and posted new links. There's a difference. If I go and grab the link to the page with that original post, people can click that, click the links and see they do not work.

My post has no signs of editing, or no hint the links are any different. They even show the same file names at the end of the links, with the same photobucket account username.

The reason the links don't "work" in your post, is because the "..." in the links show up in the address bar, only when you click on them in your post.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The signs of editing is the fact that on the original post the links are broken and deleted, on the "new" one, they are new links and they work. Why? Because when you quoted it, you edited the links. This is fact, it could not happen any other way, and all the proof is against you. Better chill out, you're oddly annoyed for an innocent man.

And this is rather strange for another reason. You weren't even able to say what the original trailer-rendered pics (that you claimed I posted) were of. 😬

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Go to the bottom of the page, type my name in Search by User. Find it.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So you openly admit Halo 3's graphics are inferior to Bioshock's?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So you openly admit Halo 3's graphics are inferior to Bioshock's?

-AC

Bioshock has better graphics IMHO. 😐