God or No God?

Started by Bun Bun96 pages

There should of been a not sure choice.

But I believe in what i want to believe. I do believe in some sort of spirtualness.. but not god.

I dun believe there is one. The way I see it is there is either none, or many. I don't like the idea of just one person controlling everything.

I'm gonna reaffirm shel's statement.

I believe in a God, and the whole devine power of and over the universe, and I definitely respect the Catholic church to which I belong, but I'm not overtly religious.

I believe church practices are out of date and don't lead us towards God anymore but more so away from God when faced with harsh restrictions and the image of a vengeful God.

Also I think those that mock religion of any kind are despicable human beings.

I do not believe in a god. Atleast not like described in any religion

There is more evidence of intelligent life beyond Planet Earth than there is of "god". Personally, I wouldn't want to be part of a religion who's symbol is a guy nailed to two pieces of wood.

Originally posted by Impediment
There is more evidence of intelligent life beyond Planet Earth than there is of "god". Personally, I wouldn't want to be part of a religion who's symbol is a guy nailed to two pieces of wood.

Totally agree ✅

Originally posted by Impediment
There is more evidence of intelligent life beyond Planet Earth than there is of "god". Personally, I wouldn't want to be part of a religion who's symbol is a guy nailed to two pieces of wood.
Originally posted by Bun Bun
Totally agree ✅
What she said.

Originally posted by Impediment
There is more evidence of intelligent life beyond Planet Earth than there is of "god". Personally, I wouldn't want to be part of a religion who's symbol is a guy nailed to two pieces of wood.
You can be religious/spiritual without being a Christian.

Yea, but the definition of religious is a belief in a god or deity, so you can be spiritual but to be religious you must believe in a god, regardless of which.

Originally posted by silver_tears
Yea, but the definition of religious is a belief in a god or deity, so you can be spiritual but to be religious you must believe in a god, regardless of which.
and....?

i am so not a religious person.

Originally posted by Lana
Ahh well, it's a given I'm going to hell, so let's have fun while we can 😊

So when are we gonna "get it on"?

I'm a minister. Yes, I believe in God.

Originally posted by Psyquis52
I'm a minister. Yes, I believe in God.

Thats cool. I dont have anything against religious people, i just dont think its for me. However i do believe that there is a greater force at hand.

Originally posted by Penelope
Thats cool. I dont have anything against religious people, i just dont think its for me. However i do believe that there is a greater force at hand.
I'm not religious. 🙄
I am a minister, but I'm not religious.

Vinny 1
Punky 0

😂

Originally posted by Mr_Famous
I believe in God. Yes I'm a biology student but the theory before the evolution doesnt makes sense to me (ie: the Big Bang theory, if there was nothing before the bang, where did the bang come from?)

what is your idea of God? I do believe there is a Single principle behind all creations and evolution is the process...

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Vinny 1
Punky 0

😂

🙁

😛

Originally posted by Mr_Famous
I believe in God. Yes I'm a biology student but the theory before the evolution doesnt makes sense to me (ie: the Big Bang theory, if there was nothing before the bang, where did the bang come from?)

There are a few theories which address that question: where did the Big Bang come from?

Probably the most widely accepted answer is that the Cosmos--in its Grandest Sense--is a "false" or unstable vacuum in which Big Bangs are happening all the time. In other words, a Big Bang is a quantum fluctuation which brings out a "truer" or more stable vacuum. Our universe is the result of one such quantum fluctuation.

What's more, we don't see these other Big Bangs because they are beyond the horizon of our observable universe, ie, the light from those Bangs hasn't reached us and likely never will.

One can also take this approach...
"Where did this Grand Cosmos come from?"
"God created it."
"Where did God come from?"
"God always was."
"So why not just simplify and say, 'The Cosmos always was'?"

The thing is, bottom line: God and Science are not necessarily mutually exclusive. You can believe in both.

Originally posted by Mindship
There are a few theories which address that question: where did the Big Bang come from?

Probably the most widely accepted answer is that the Cosmos--in its Grandest Sense--is a "false" or unstable vacuum in which Big Bangs are happening all the time. In other words, a Big Bang is a quantum fluctuation which brings out a "truer" or more stable vacuum. Our universe is the result of one such quantum fluctuation.

What's more, we don't see these other Big Bangs because they are beyond the horizon of our observable universe, ie, the light from those Bangs hasn't reached us and likely never will.

One can also take this approach...
"Where did this Grand Cosmos come from?"
"God created it."
"Where did God come from?"
"God always was."
"So why not just simplify and say, The Cosmos always was?"

The thing is, bottom line: God and Science are not necessarily mutually exclusive. You can believe in both.

Because the cosmos HAD a beginning; it is NOT eternal.

Second, WHAT intiated the big bang (everything has a cause and is an effect of something else except God).

Third, WHERE did the vacuum come from?