Batman vs Superman

Started by ZephroCarnelian17 pages

Superman's only disadvantage in this is his kryptonite weakness... Without the K Ring Bats doesn't stand a chance of hurting Superman, let alone defeating him. But with the ring, there's no limit to the devious tactics that Bats' brain can dream up...

And Wonder Woman SHOULD squash Bats like a bug with her near-Superman powers and her lack of stupid weaknesses... but this is Batman we're talking about, lol....

have to go

MY TiME IN THIS WORLD IS UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fatherrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Batman should never be underestimated.

I agree. But Batman shouldn't be placed on such a high level that people think he can beat Superman 100% of the time.

I think under the right conditions Batman could beat Superman about 68.89% of the time.....meaning in 10 fights Batman should win roughly 7 or them.

Well said and vise versa

And Wonder Woman SHOULD squash Bats like a bug with her near-Superman powers and her lack of stupid weaknesses... but this is Batman we're talking about, lol....
WW could beat batman because she doesnt have any weakness as stupid as Superman

Those quotes above are stating what I have been saying about wonder woman.

Here is what I was trying to say. Earlier, you in essence admitted that Wonder Woman would beat Batman. Now when you said this, I was confused. Superman and Wonder Woman have very similar powers, and by far the biggest difference between the two is that Superman is weakened by kryptonite. So I wondered, if he admits that WW can defeat Batman, why wouldn't he admit that Superman (whose powers are greater than WW) would be able to beat Bats as well. It didn't make sense to me that Batman's strategy could beat Superman, but not Wonder Woman. But I guess that is not what you were trying to say.

No in essence wonder woman stands a better chance of defeating batman more easily because she does not have any apparent weaknesses.

My apologies, I mis-interpreted what you were saying. I withdraw whatever comments I made in response to that.

Originally posted by Mainstream
I think under the right conditions Batman could beat Superman about 68.89% of the time.....meaning in 10 fights Batman should win roughly 7 or them.

That's highly debatable. There are an infinite number of possible scenarios. No one can guess at how they will play out.

I know I was just messing around.

Originally posted by SarKastic_OJ
Why does he have to "prepare" for Superman? Most comic fight's aren't planned out but rather spontaneous and spur of the moment. You actually think when Batman wakes up in the morning he goes "Well, I might be fighting Superman today, lemme equip some Kryptonite just in case"..Hell no..That's absurd...

If these guy's fight, it will be by some sort of circumstance(i.e. one of them goes rogue, is posessed) Superman has any and every advantage in that situation..Superman is overall better than batman, screw being smarter, smartness didn't help Batman against Bane when his spine was broken.

You guy's either underestimate the hell out of Superman or you just plain don't like him. Face it, giving Batman Kryptonite is cheating, and even with Kryptonite the most Batman could do is beat on Superman, I doubt he lacks the ability to kill him, the kryptonite would do "all" the work..Superman could probably defeat an army of Batman's if he wanted to..

Every morning when Batman wakes up in his cave he says this: Superman might go crazy and kill everyone.."better take some Kryponite with me if he comes my way."
Oh yeah, Batman is "smarter" than the Juggernaut, Hulk, Thanos and Surfer, does that mean he can beat them too....no...

Every morning when Batman wakes up in his cave he says this: "Superman might go crazy today..better take some of the green stuff so I can take him down....hopefully."

How do you know this? Was he thinking about Superman when he got his back broken?

Batman would die 1000 deaths if he faced Superman..

You guys really don't know how absurd you sound when you say he carries Kryptonite with him 24/7, thats just some rabbid fan assumption in hopes to aid your Batman defeating Superman argument..

Point is, he doesn't carry around kryptonite 24/7, and if this fight was spontaneous(as many hero vs hero based fights are) Superman would destroy Batman within mere seconds...

It's not really that ridiculous when you think about it. After all, it IS Batman, the most untrusting bastard in DC. Why wouldn't he carry around an immediate weakness for the most powerful being on Earth? There's no one out there more prepared (or more paranoid) than this guy. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if he had a little compartment in his belt just for such a thing. It's not entirely impossible.

Originally posted by The Flash
How do you know this? Was he thinking about Superman when he got his back broken?

Nah. Supes was dead I think.

It's not impossible at all, and in my opinion it's very likely.

Does anyone know for a fact that Batman has kryptonite with him at all times? Not just examples of when he does have it, but something that basically states that he always has it? I thought there were a few people a few pages back that said he did.

Anytime he has his utility belt, he has kryptonite.

There are times when Bruce Wayne probably does not have it on his person, though.

Originally posted by David Duchovony
Nah. Supes was dead I think.

The mighty Superman was "dead" I keep hoping when they "kill him" he'll stay "dead" and let Superboy become Superman....but I doubt that'd happen anytime soon...if at all.

Originally posted by OtterVomit
Anytime he has his utility belt, he has kryptonite.

There are times when Bruce Wayne probably does not have it on his person, though.

So he does? I'm not trying to disprove that, but do you have any proof?

Lex Luthor used to keep the kryptonite on a ring and eventually got
cancer because of it. Kryptonite is radioactive. There's no way in hell
Batman would keep it in his belt ALL the time.