I wanna belive in god..

Originally posted by Mr Brightside
The proof is in the bible. The lack of evidence against evolution is because the scientists just discard any evidence that doesn't agree with it.

Are you saying that everything is the bible is hardline fact?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Are you saying that everything is the bible is hardline fact?

according to a number of Christians the bible has all the answers...there just being lazy...

Originally posted by Mr Brightside
The proof is in the bible. The lack of evidence against evolution is because the scientists just discard any evidence that doesn't agree with it.

You are out of your mind. If I am an up coming scientist, I can write my own check if I can show that evolution was false. Competition insures that information is not discarded, because if it is, and it has happened, someone will come along and find it, and use it.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are out of your mind. If I am an up coming scientist, I can write my own check if I can show that evolution was false. Competition insures that information is not discarded, because if it is, and it has happened, someone will come along and find it, and use it.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Though in the quantum science field, many scientists turns a blind eye.. ✅

Well, quantum scientists talk to Sally too much. 😛

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Well, quantum scientists talk to Sally too much. 😛

Quantum sciences does have much in common with the supernatural phenomena's that are now being studied. Much is being written about it...Though some scientists would have to give up their old dinosaur thinking to embrace new studies....Once this happens we will all start moving a bit more quickly in finding some truths.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are out of your mind. If I am an up coming scientist, I can write my own check if I can show that evolution was false. Competition insures that information is not discarded, because if it is, and it has happened, someone will come along and find it, and use it.

Not really...http://www.alternativescience.com/darwinism.htm

The scientific community is very biased in my opinion.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Not really...http://www.alternativescience.com/darwinism.htm

You use the Internet as a source? Go talk to Deano. 🙄

Find me a published scientific publication.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
The scientific community is very biased in my opinion.

The religious community as a lot to loose if evolution to proven. So, they will never see the truth.

Scientific community is very well biased in my opinion also....

Originally posted by debbiejo
Scientific community is very well biased in my opinion....

I think not.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I think not.

Why can't evolution go hand in hand with other theories?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You use the Internet as a source? Go talk to Deano. 🙄

Find me a published scientific publication.

The religious community as a lot to loose if evolution to proven. So, they will never see the truth.

This might take some time so bare with me, But anyway science isn't just listening to some ones research it's experimenting, evolution is theory while perhaps a number of it's findings may be correct not all are and not all scientist agree with all aspects of the theory...So it's not absolute science is always changing so you can't be 100% in certain cases.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
This might take some time so bare with me, But anyway science isn't just listening to some ones research it's experimenting, evolution is theory while perhaps a number of it's findings may be correct not all are and not all scientist agree with all aspects of the theory...So it's not absolute science is always changing so you can't be 100% in certain cases.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
This might take some time so bare with me, But anyway science isn't just listening to some ones research it's experimenting, evolution is theory while perhaps a number of it's findings may be correct not all are and not all scientist agree with all aspects of the theory...So it's not absolute science is always changing so you can't be 100% in certain cases.

I agree with that, but what is the alternative?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I think not.

So if a scientist tells you the earth was made from a guy taking a dump from heaven you would believe it, science isn't about belief it's about fact and the community isn't the absolute view it's the mainstream view.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I agree with that, but what is the alternative?

Non mainstream.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Non mainstream.

What does that mean?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What does that mean?

Well let me explain, while science is based on fact, scientist are also humans so let's say your a scientist and discover that dinosaurs didn't exsist and you have irrefutable evidence the only way your findings will be excepted is if the scientific community let's or else it will be censored and you'll be deemed a pseudo scientist, Honestly there shouldn't be mainstream science and alternative science because science is the pursuit of the truth and the Truth is what it is.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
because science is the pursuit of the truth and the Truth is what it is.