I wanna belive in god..

Started by Shakyamunison13 pages
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Well let me explain, while science is based on fact, scientist are also humans so let's say your a scientist and discover that dinosaurs didn't exsist and you have irrefutable evidence the only way your findings will be excepted is if the scientific community let's or else it will be censored and you'll be deemed a pseudo scientist, Honestly there shouldn't be mainstream science and alternative science because science is the pursuit of the truth and the Truth is what it is.

You are speculating. The history of science clearly shows how sometimes things like this can happen, however, it also shows that scientists are fickle and will change their minds in a heartbeat. So, a revolutionary theory, like evolution was in the beginning, considered to be not true, but never covered up. As time went by, more evidence was found and more scientists get on board. If some of the non-mainstream theories are correct, in time, they will come forward and become mainstream science. I think you are succumbing to conspiracy propaganda. The scientific process has been proven over time, and new theories have to wait their turn to be verified.

The proof is in the bible. The lack of evidence against evolution is because the scientists just discard any evidence that doesn't agree with it.
what proof lies in the bible???

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are speculating. The history of science clearly shows how sometimes like this can happen, however, it also shows that scientists are fickle and will change their minds in a heartbeat. So, a revolutionary theory, like evolution was in the beginning, considered to be not true, but never covered up. As time went by, more evidence was found and more scientists get on board. If some of the non-mainstream theories are correct, in time, they will come forward and become mainstream science. I think you are succumbing to conspiracy propaganda. The scientific process has been proven over time, and new theories have to wait their turn to be verified.

Really so ask any scientist to debate darwnism in public, did you even read the link I gave you,the thing about skeptisim is that it so often becomes denial...

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Really so ask any scientist to debate darwnism in public, did you even read the link I gave you,the thing about skeptisim is that it so often becomes denial...

There was a public court case all about the theory. I wish you lean some history.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There was a public court case all about the theory. I wish you lean some history.

Right and what does that prove 🙄

Right and what does that prove
as much as the bible prove

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Right and what does that prove 🙄

That you don't know what you are talking about? 😕

If some court said that satanism is legal and should and is a mandatory curriculum does that mean it's correct, so it's okay to attack religion yet science has a perfect record?

It dosent' have to be the bible, though could be some bigger influence that scientists have discarded.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That you don't know what you are talking about? 😕

And you do 😉

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
. I wish you lean some history.
History is important, but you must look at all the new sciences out there and the research on them...

Originally posted by debbiejo
It dosent' have to be the bible, though could be some bigger influence that scientists have discarded.

I'm just giving an example, the common misconception is that there is no science behind religion though there are some crazy theories ( zecharia sitchin ) Doesn't mean they are all wrong feeling's are irrelevant in science it's fact's that count the most.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
I'm just giving an example, the common misconception is that there is no science behind religion though there are some crazy theories ( zecharia sitchin ) Doesn't mean they are all wrong feeling's are irrelevant in science it's fact's that count the most.
Religions no, I don't agree, but not with spirituality connectedness thingie... 😄

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
If some court said that satanism is legal and should and is a mandatory curriculum does that mean it's correct, so it's okay to attack religion yet science has a perfect record?

No, but science has a record.

What is it that you are not saying? I think you are being deceptive and not telling me your underling agenda. Just like that link you gave me. It dances around something but never shows it agenda. This is similar to Intelligent Deign, which is a “code word” for “Christianity”. I know this because ID people reject concepts like, evolution is the “had of God”, or the universe is God. So, I don’t believe anyone with a hidden agenda.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I wish you lean some history.

Research nikola teskla

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Research nikola teskla
Whoooo...I have.. ✅

Shaky, you need to read this.....yes..

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No, but science has a record.

What is it that you are not saying? I think you are being deceptive and not telling me your underling agenda. Just like that link you gave me. It dances around something but never shows it agenda. This is similar to Intelligent Deign, which is a “code word” for “Christianity”. I know this because ID people reject concepts like, evolution is the “had of God”, or the universe is God. So, I don’t believe anyone with a hidden agenda.

I'm just saying science is about discovery and about the truth it isn't about sides because the truth is the truth there are number(can't say how many) of theories and facts that get disregarded, While I disagree with certain aspects of the bible I can't sign it off as complete fiction because Some panel of expert says so I have to research myself and prove it is that's true science.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Research nikola teskla

Do you mean Nikola Tesla?

Very interesting and way ahead of his time. Perhaps his time has not yet come.

If people just start letting people tell them what's true are not then there no better then religious nuts or automatons. always research both sides of the story and debate the facts

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
I'm just saying science is about discovery and about the truth it isn't about sides because the truth is the truth there are number(can't say how many) of theories and facts that get disregarded, While I disagree with certain aspects of the bible I can't sign it off as complete fiction because Some panel of expert says so I have to research myself and prove it is that's true science.

I agree with your statement. But if you give me a link to a Christian propaganda site, I’m going to put you in that camp. I’m sorry if I am wrong.