First of all............don't ****in label me.............I admitted that I am not as knowledgeable as you, yet am on paragraph, but not the same page...................please.....I am not a scholar.........just a lay person with interests...................I know my studies and have come up with the same reasoning as you.............soooooooooooooooooooooo.........hmmm.............no caffeine for you there bud!
I didn't **** (fucking?) label you! I said nothing of the sort......
I am by no means a scholar.......just a lay person with interest, just as yourself. The only difference perhaps is my level of interest and research done on the subject as part of my fascination with basically all things science (except geology, that's just boring).
Look you said ****ing word again................hahahahah 😂
in short (read my f-cking post for more in-depth reasoning)..
I took it this way............guess you were calling your own self ****ing dumb, if we can't relate to a super long post, or don't want to..............again..........I do agree with you.llllll............hahaha.
btw.........please change your sig.............it scares the shit out or me.;hahaha
I wasn't calling anybody dumb........I was calling you lazy........hence me shortening my long winded yet well thought out post into a few bullet points that merely give a few beliefs without any of the logical deduction or reasoning I used to arrive at them.
completely off subject........but why don't you just kiss me and get it over with?
Originally posted by Evil Dead😂
I wasn't calling anybody dumb........I was calling you lazy........hence me shortening my long winded yet well thought out post into a few bullet points that merely give a few beliefs without any of the logical deduction or reasoning I used to arrive at them.completely off subject........but why don't you just kiss me and get it over with?
I know we agree.....And I suppose these long posts are for many that wondn't understand, but me??.............ME ?????
A kiss??? LOL.............They don't come cheaply............but ok..........let's make up..........hahaha (wtf, I don't even know what little smilie to post).........lol
sorry, but in long posts, I just scan..........always been a fault of mine.....
Don't think so..................heard about these lttle things.....................lol
Don't U know what that means?............hahaha...........not your way, but mine..................now lool! We're getten off this topic, what ever it was....let me look.................bb
I agree, why shouldn't there be something ?? Why couldn't be in our near future................why could we be though of as mor primitive and they are now, why can't the be in the positive and negative in what we experience,...............AND, why hasn't other spaces (dimensions) been included in the conversations?.................We j;ust dont know
excuse spelling
Originally posted by Evil DeadThe word is "As we know of"..........And this is only one of the newest theories...........there are others that haven't gotten much attention...like "Holographic theory, or Universe and multiple theory".........why do we think we know it all now........Isn't this how it has always been in ancient history until now...........?
I said:according to string theory......there could be 11 dimensions......but how do you believe they could affect us? All physical laws are pretty much explained by the three physical dimensions we presently know of.
dimensions have nothing to do with any of those latter things you've mentioned. Dimensions are coordinates on a plane..........so far we know of only three physical, X left-right, Y up-down and Z front-back......and ofcourse time.
String theory isn't new......it's almost 50 years old. I've never heard of holographic theory or whatever so it's total BS.......if there were anything to this, I would have read about it........as for multiple universes.......that's covered in M-theory........what of it? It too has nothing to do with extra, unseen dimensions.......it's simply universes existing beyond the boundries of our own..........
And with that said, we are only discovering what can or what can be or how it may work...........The problem with scientists is that theft/dead./thiking....IMO, that they know IT ALL, and of course there couldn't be something beyond the newest discovery, cause it would blow them OUT...
bTW what is your prob. with holographic theory..........and remember it is only a theory..........
sorry.....debbiejo.....I like you and all.......but that first paragraph is total bullshit. Science is ever changing. Science is the search for knowledge. Once found, that knowledge stands. Once a theory is devised to explain something given present knowledge........it stands until another theory comes along via new knowledge. By your false analysis, science would still regard the Earth as the center of the solar system...........
I just did a bit of reading on "hologram" theory.......I had never heard of it as such (but had under meta-physical hoodoo names).......my problem is there is not one iota of evidence to suggest this. It's totally out of a man's imagination with no supporting evidence of any kind. One might as well make the assertion the universe is made of cheese.
But we only base our knowledge on some facts and theories.........there are can be other theories................yes??????? Isn't that what science is about.............AND I do know you understand this field.............tell me ............no ......don't............lol..........you are very knowledgeable, but you cannot discount some future science................this is all I am saying............................
The problem with some sciences is that they are like dinosaurs.........hard to move...................
It's called looking at all the possibilities.................