who is better, Vince Carter or Tracy Mcgrady?

Started by tanjot14 pages

correlate? ill have to look up the dictionary for that one.

i want everyone to check out this link: http://www.nba.com/nets/features/vc_side.html

Originally posted by tanjot
i want everyone to check out this link: http://www.nba.com/nets/features/vc_side.html

That was beautiful man (i almost teared up reading that), your right Vince is just misunderstood.

and why exactly woudl teh nets publish a bad article on vince? its publicity man... why wouldnt you give a team mate a lift to practice? who doesnt acknowledge if someone puts a good shot up? its common courtesy... simple as that.

i got teh latest slam not long ago, (i say latest... we probably get it a month later than the us) but i'm fed up of iverson. what more is there to say about him? misunderstood, good player blah blah... and with ron artest? they're now backing him up for wanting to be traded and saying that o'neal and bird didnt forgive him back him enough... ron artest is an idiot. heck of a player yeah, but hes still an idiot personality wise.

^ ✅

Also, nobody ever said that Carter wasn't a nice guy. Its just that when things go sour, he wimps out on his team.

Originally posted by Myth
^ ✅

Also, nobody ever said that Carter wasn't a nice guy. Its just that when things go sour, he wimps out on his team.

like what...bringing them to their present 7 game winning streak?

No, I said WHEN things go sour. The Nets like Carter right now because things aren't going sour. Nice use of sarcasm btw 😉

when things r going "sour", is when vince does not play well for the nets, and the only time that has happened is throughout the 1 week stretch where he was injured. but guess what..he played through the injuries with a back injury which is not easy to do, and he did not play well, but at the same tine he did not make excuses. when he recovered he began playing very well again, and the nets continued to win, and are doing so right now. so i do not understand what you mean by saying that vince wimps out on his team.

Why do you play stupid? I know you understand what I mean.

Originally posted by tanjot
when things r going "sour", is when vince does not play well for the nets, and the only time that has happened is throughout the 1 week stretch where he was injured. but guess what..he played through the injuries with a back injury which is not easy to do, and he did not play well, but at the same tine he did not make excuses. when he recovered he began playing very well again, and the nets continued to win, and are doing so right now. so i do not understand what you mean by saying that vince wimps out on his team.

i just clearly stated that i do not understand you and why...

tanjot... TORONTO.... wimping out?

Originally posted by Myth
Why do you play stupid? I know you understand what I mean.

Dont be too sure now Myth, you may need to spell this one out.

Originally posted by darth_royke
tanjot... TORONTO.... wimping out?

or you can let Royke handle that for you.

Wow tanjot. Simply wow. We have discussed Carter quitting on the Raptors for nearly half a year with you and you didn't understand what I meant by saying Vince wimps out when things go sour?

Originally posted by Myth
Wow tanjot. Simply wow. We have discussed Carter quitting on the Raptors for nearly half a year with you and you didn't understand what I meant by saying Vince wimps out when things go sour?

Wow myth. Simply wow. how many times have i explained and proven that vince used to wimp out on his team as the raptors because he needed a new scenery and now that he has it he is stepping up to the challenge, playing hard offence and defence ( i know everyone will disagree but next time you see a nets game you can see the difference for yourself) night it, night out, and has tried to play 4 games through a back injury, which is not easy to do....plz do not bring up this topic again..and if you are then prove your point using the present, not the past.

Originally posted by darth_royke
and why exactly woudl teh nets publish a bad article on vince? its publicity man... why wouldnt you give a team mate a lift to practice? who doesnt acknowledge if someone puts a good shot up? its common courtesy... simple as that.

i got teh latest slam not long ago, (i say latest... we probably get it a month later than the us) but i'm fed up of iverson. what more is there to say about him? misunderstood, good player blah blah... and with ron artest? they're now backing him up for wanting to be traded and saying that o'neal and bird didnt forgive him back him enough... ron artest is an idiot. heck of a player yeah, but hes still an idiot personality wise.

hey...los angelos has had many articles that have badmouthed kobe...so there is not just good publicity within your team...it depends on the person and situation.

Originally posted by tanjot
Wow myth. Simply wow. how many times have i explained and proven that vince used to wimp out on his team as the raptors because he needed a new scenery and now that he has it he is stepping up to the challenge, playing hard offence and defence ( i know everyone will disagree but next time you see a nets game you can see the difference for yourself) night it, night out, and has tried to play 4 games through a back injury, which is not easy to do....plz do not bring up this topic again..and if you are then prove your point using the present, not the past.

to add to that, and prove my point..http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1143413410091&call_pageid=969907729483&col=970081562040

Originally posted by tanjot
Wow myth. Simply wow. how many times have i explained and proven that vince used to wimp out on his team as the raptors because he needed a new scenery and now that he has it he is stepping up to the challenge, playing hard offence and defence ( i know everyone will disagree but next time you see a nets game you can see the difference for yourself) night it, night out, and has tried to play 4 games through a back injury, which is not easy to do....plz do not bring up this topic again..and if you are then prove your point using the present, not the past.

Thats all well and good but it has to work both ways. If you're going to only bring up the present then all the good things that Vince has done in the past shouldnt be included in debates right?

Originally posted by darth_royke
and why exactly woudl teh nets publish a bad article on vince? its publicity man... why wouldnt you give a team mate a lift to practice? who doesnt acknowledge if someone puts a good shot up? its common courtesy... simple as that.

i got teh latest slam not long ago, (i say latest... we probably get it a month later than the us) but i'm fed up of iverson. what more is there to say about him? misunderstood, good player blah blah... and with ron artest? they're now backing him up for wanting to be traded and saying that o'neal and bird didnt forgive him back him enough... ron artest is an idiot. heck of a player yeah, but hes still an idiot personality wise.

and he put out a rap song 🙁

Originally posted by koolruningz
Thats all well and good but it has to work both ways. If you're going to only bring up the present then all the good things that Vince has done in the past shouldnt be included in debates right?

wimping out just means wimping out...as in not trying and not playing hard which is vince at times used to do, i could or could not use the past because vince is having a great season anyway so it wont make a difference to me.

Ok you just let us know whats taboo and whats not then, as we are playing by your rules.