All Of Star Trek Vs All Of Star Wars

Started by Autokrat76 pages
Originally posted by Red Nemesis
yeah we've established that like 5 times

You think I'm going to read all the other posts in this MASSIVE thread?

Actually this thread has been around since I joined I think.

The sun crusher is stupid. Did you even see it in any SW movie? I mean, what kind of steel do you put so the Sun Crusher could resist being banged by the DS Prototype's laser??

And a torpedo? Being launched into the core of a star? Fake. The torpedo would simply melt before it even reaches the surface. And now you tell me that it can "burrow" into the core??

DS II remains the most practical Star Wars superweapon, not the Star Wars false glorifiyng fighter-sized Sun Crusher.

V'Ger and the Death Star are comparable figures.

Originally posted by Budada
The sun crusher is stupid. Did you even see it in any SW movie? I mean, what kind of steel do you put so the Sun Crusher could resist being banged by the DS Prototype's laser??

And a torpedo? Being launched into the core of a star? Fake. The torpedo would simply melt before it even reaches the surface. And now you tell me that it can "burrow" into the core??

DS II remains the most practical Star Wars superweapon, not the Star Wars false glorifiyng fighter-sized Sun Crusher.

So your argument against the Sun Crusher is that it is physically impossible?

Your argument is that it is physically impossible when it is the least unlikely weapon (by our universe's laws of physics) yet devised by the Empire?

Your argument is that, while the Sun Crusher is physically impossible, the DSII is the most practical weapon yet devised?

facepalm

Originally posted by Budada
The sun crusher is stupid. Did you even see it in any SW movie? I mean, what kind of steel do you put so the Sun Crusher could resist being banged by the DS Prototype's laser??

And a torpedo? Being launched into the core of a star? Fake. The torpedo would simply melt before it even reaches the surface. And now you tell me that it can "burrow" into the core??

DS II remains the most practical Star Wars superweapon, not the Star Wars false glorifiyng fighter-sized Sun Crusher.

U R Re.Tar.Ded.

Didn't I say that already?

A Tango takes two.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Star Trek is for the audience that likes time travel, issuing orders, and Communism.

Not to mention moral dilemmas and finely trimmed beards. As much as I like lasers and swords, those moral dilemmas always pulled me in. Also the beards.

Riker's beard--and I say this from an unblemished record of staunch heterosexuality--was fabulous.

Can't argue that.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
U R Re.Tar.Ded.

Just why?'

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
I'm no stranger to Star Trek, but I'm by no means a Trekkie. Star Wars is for the audience that likes lasers, space battles, and moral absolutism. Star Trek is for the audience that likes time travel, issuing orders, and Communism.

First of all, Star Wars was a BOOK, not a series. You wouldn't want a series to follow one great plot, won't you? You just translated my reply, but otherwise what you're saying is a tad similar to mine.

Star Trek was meant to describe what would probably happen in the future, because space travel was very well alive in the 60's when the original Trek first appeared. Star Wars is a fictional legend, Star Trek is a fictional interpretation of the future.

Originally posted by Budada
Just why?'

First of all, Star Wars was a BOOK, not a series. You wouldn't want a series to follow one great plot, won't you? You just translated my reply, but otherwise what you're saying is a tad similar to mine.

Star Trek was meant to describe what would probably happen in the future, because space travel was very well alive in the 60's when the original Trek first appeared. Star Wars is a fictional legend, Star Trek is a fictional interpretation of the future.

You're pretty weird, kid (your bizarre grammar notwithstanding)---and grossly misinformed if you think Star Wars is known as a book. You also seem to think that I was arguing or countering something YOU said, when really I was responding to Mannoroth II. You're a strange, strange boy.

Species 8472 could destroy a Death Star quite easily...they destroyed a fleet of Borg Cubes and destroyed countless planets in Borg Space. Star Wars fans also forget that the Borg do Assimilate alien species. They will assimilate countless alien species in the Star Wars galaxy and gain invaluable information concerning technology.

Also, since Q is not allowed to participate...Star Trek has other odd aliens with vast powers. I would imagine that the "god" entity in Star Trek 5 would annihilate much of the SW galaxy if it was in that galaxy. I don't see what the Force could do to something like that.

In Star Trek IV..the alien species that threatened to destroy the Earth because of the extinction of the whale population..would probably be hard for the SW team to reckon with. The Federation had no answer for that alien vessel.

Tech. wise Star Wars has an unfair advantage (and in numbers).

Species-wise though, Star Trek would annihilate Star Wars.

Fine u guys can have Q but we can have chuck Norris

Plus why fight......there's more fight to be had with twillight all of ST and SW v twilight

Spite. Star Wars is a type 3 civilization and its power generation figures and hyperdrives are extremely high, like in the hundreds of trillions of gigawatts.

Strangely though, in ground combat Star Wars isn't nearly as uber powerful as it is in space, but Star Trek is even worse at ground combat.

Unless if species 8472 is far more powerful that they appear or if a god like being like the Q sides with Star Trek, Star Wars wins.

However, IDK much about Star Trek; most of my knowledge about Star Trek is from Memory Alpha.

I find it hard to navigate Memory Alpha. I think it's the color scheme.

Startrek ground combat:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SK0cUNMnMM

Originally posted by truejedi
Startrek ground combat:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SK0cUNMnMM

Epic.