Originally posted by jaden101
"That scientist guy who has a PhD" eh?...Well that's settled then eh? 😆
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdILmgJGuvw
According to Wikipedia Michio Kaku has a PHD.
Yet so can a home made missle built by a single person. (Trilithium
torpedo built by Tolian Soran) in the film "Generations"
That's faulty logic you're using here. You're trying to make the "smaller is better" argument, yet clearly both sides are inconsistent in that.
Do I need to repeat myself about them being the only species residing in their entire universe?
Yes, and elaborate.
So because they COULD be made then they exist and are in ST canon?....Besides if an Acclamator class ship is vastly lower in power than an Imperial SD then I'd love to see how much lower in power in 25,000 year older vessel would be.
Even an Acclamator would be a match for the entire Federation fleet combined (not kidding).
No...As I've already stated...The Voth have transwarp (and have done for a long time)...Species 116 had transwarp technology that they called quantum slipstream drive (transwarp isn't a technology per se...It's simply the term used to describe faster than warp travel)
Except that said transwarp wasn't massed produced by any Star Trek civilization other than the borg and species 8472.
As I've already stated...Yes.
You've brought evidence showing the speed of the borg's transwarp, but not that of other Star Trek civilizations.
Which newer tech manuals?...Name them...Page numbers...Quotes please.
www.stardestroyer.net (aka the premier site for most pro Star Wars debaters 😉) shows a quote from Data that talks about the Enterprise generating a certain number of billions of gigawatts "per second", yet an imperial star destroyer has the power generation in the quadrillions of gigawatts. Later, more advanced star destroyers have even more power generation capabilities.
As an example, the reactor core of a star destroyer can supply the power of almost one million Enterprises.
Yet 8 species 8472 ships can destroy planets completely where as it takes a fleet of Star Destroyers days to liquify the surface of a planet....Yet supposedly species 8472 ships aren't as powerful as a SD....On screen evidence proves you wrong whether there is a tech manual giving quantified numbers or not.
*sigh*
Yet the sun crusher is even smaller than 8 species 8472 bioships and is MORE powerful.
Explain how they work then please.
WTF? Are you suggesting that all technology works using frequency technology?
Star Trek tech often uses frequency technology, but Star Wars tech does not.
Therefore, you've proved yourself wrong.
Because their technology IS ORGANIC and is thus entirely genetically based...
And how does that make it harder to adapt to them?
So the Vong ships can obliterate planets?...The Vong ships can take entire fleets of extremely powerful ships firing on them without any damage at all?....
Strawman.
Also, there's the firepower difference (yes, you've probably heard this many times from other pro Star Wars debaters, but it's a valid argument). A medium turbolaser from a star destroyer has a firepower of 200 gigatons according to the Star Wars: ICS.
A photon torpedo from the Enterprise has the theoretical yield of 64 megatons if there's 100% efficiency (which there wouldn't be; 100% efficiency is a scienfitic impossibility based on what we know) according to the TM. Before you say "omg it's not canon!", note that this is actually one of the HIGHEST firepower figures given.
Also, a turbolaser focuses its energy on the target, whereas a photon torpedo is omnidirectional in damage. Therefore, you'd have to cut the figure from 64 megatons to 32 megatons, even if you discount the fact that it wouldn't be 100% efficient.
Therefore, you have 200 gigatons vs 32 megatons.
32 megatons = 0.032 gigatons.
200 gigatons vs 0.032 gigatons.
A medium turbolaser strike from a star destroyer is 6250 times more powerful than a photon torpedo.
And a typical star destroyer has about 5 medium and 5 heavy turbolaser batteries. The heavy turbolaser batteries have the firepower in the teratons.