Classic Debate: If a tree falls in the woods...

Started by buttafly17 pages

Classic Debate: If a tree falls in the woods...

...and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? I've debated this with my friend and because her favourite subject is SCIENCE, she argues that sounds still exists even though no one else can hear it. What are you thoughts on this??

i believe the same as ur friend.

light must exist when we don't see it doesn't it?

I also agree.

If a woman yells at a man and no one hears, is he still wrong?

Originally posted by debbiejo
I also agree.

If a woman yells at a man and no one hears, is he still wrong?

Now that's a more debatable forum. 😆

But getting back to the original question. I would have to say No. The only way you would know if a tree fell in the forest is if you saw its debris. However, you can see a tree falling from a distance without actually hearing it. So you don't have to hear the tree at all.

These are questions we may never find an answear too.JM

"Things do exist". However for humans to know it, they have to use their 5 senses, to imput it into their brains... If a tree falls, no humans around, therefore humans interpret the event to the proof they know, which is the tree never existed. For animals however, which saw it, knows that the tree exist, because they have all the proof they need.

It's just the same as where london doesn't exist, for those who never been there or heard of it?

Follow the teachings of your sig, peterKSL, 'cause you're confusing the issue. Just because a tree falls in the forest and no human is around to hear it doesn't mean it never existed. It could have been standing tall one day and down the next. The sound may not have been heard by human ears, but the object still exists regardless of no sound.

The question is: "If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" and not "Does the tree fall when nobody observes?" peterKSL.

The perception of sound is the sense of hearing. Someone would have to hear it in order for it to be classified as sound.

And a parody 😉

If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

The Voices Reply:

Conscience: Wow... an old question. Also unanswerable...

Reaper: No it' s not.

Conscience: Um... yes it is. You are just saying the opposite of what I' m saying, aren' t you?

Reaper: No!

Conscience: Then what sound does it make?

Reaper: It goes "CRUNCH!"

Conscience: How do you know?

Reaper: A little bird told me.

Conscience: Real mature... I have that finger too, you know...

Reaper: Well I heard a tree fall! So I know!

Conscience: You can' t know. If a tree falls in the forest and someone is there, then that person knows what sound it made, and the question doesn' t apply. The question is that if no one is there, and no one is there to witness the falling, does it make a sound?

Reaper: Yes.

Conscience: Why?

Reaper: Because I have heard a tree fall. It makes a sound.

Conscience: AAAHHH!!!

Stinger: I have a message from the head. He says that he will remain neutral.

Conscience: You got a message from the brain? I didn' t know that you communicated with that as well...

Stinger: What does the brain have to do with anything? The message came from the head that our host thinks with.

Conscience: Did the Head' s actual message involve grunting?

Stinger: How did you know?

Conscience: GET ME OUT OF HERE!

Yes, it does make a sound... the energy must be displaced in some form. Just because something isn't detected is no grounds to say it never happened when there is evidence it happened in the past.

The animals running away form it heard it, just ask them.

And no Debbie, he wouldn't be wrong. That's why men make
it a priority to not hear a word a woman says to them.

actually i think that it was more a philosophical question than a scientific one.neway

if the screams of the dead fall upon deaf ears, does it mean that they dont scream?

as long as there is some conciousness involved{be it sum 1 listenin or the cause of the sound itself or even the so called conciousness of the universe} than the sound of a tree falling has meaning.

so if every living being was color blind color ceases to exist?
its a dumb question and anyone that says it doesn't exist unless someone senses it is living in a dream land.
Just because you close your eyes doesn't mean the world vanishes until next time you open them.

actually, colours DON'T exist....

all protons have the same colour, as do all neutrons and electrons.

our eyes just percieve the differences in what we know as colour

then whatever creates the perception of color activley produces the result of color, thus color exists

actually an infinite number of things exist that we cant percieve but then even all the things thatt WE THINK EXIST are just some form of translation of something by our senses, it all depends upon your perception.

things exist only in one's mind.

what i am getting is the activity of a tree falling that produces what we percieve to be sound is still occuring even though there is no device to pick up that stimuli does not mean that stimuli does not exist.
Like i said when you close your eyes it doesn't mean the world vanishes into a void just long enough to reapear when you open them back up.
its common sense

Colour doesn't truly exist, technically.

If you look at a white surface then cast a shadow on it, the shadowed area is no longer white. If you have a red, blue and green shirt in a closet, then turn all the lights off, they all become the same colour. Why? Because "colour" is only determined by what kinds of light that surface can take in.

On topic:

No, it doesn't make a sound. It can only become sound if we hear it, that's why it's called sound. If not, it's just random energy existing somewhere.

-AC

Originally posted by leonheartmm
things exist only in one's mind.

thats retarded. Thats the place were we decipher all the information we have picked up from the outside world, but the outside world is not dependant on the existants of minds. If every living organism was to die in one moment, the stars and planets and everything is space would still remain. They do not depend on living beings to exist. We are only aware of them because of our complex biological devices that can sense the world around us in its varios ways, smell, touch, taste, sight.

i suppose this argument is just too vague, specially when people dont look at it philosophically but look at it as scientific