To all those (almost everyone) who didn't bother to read my post, or just plain didn't get it, here it is again:
No, it doesn't make a sound. It can only become sound if we hear it, that's why it's called sound. If not, it's just random energy existing somewhere.
To call it a sound is to say that we have heard it and as a result, determined it's a sound. It's a specific energy designed to be received by our senses that pick up audio. With no senses, it's just energy. If the tree falls and no one is around, the energy used to create the sound is made, but unless we're there to hear it, it can't be a sound.
Just knowing that it's happened doesn't mean it's as good AS hearing it. Yes Milla, the energy for that 'sound' existed, of course. However, unless we are around to hear and classify it as such, unless anyone or anything is around to classify it as such, it's existance is unknown, unacknowledgable and therefore, as GOOD as non-existant.
What Leonheart is saying isn't all that crap, he's just saying it in an extremely wrong way. There's loads of theories and exciting ways to talk about perception and how we might all perceive differently, but IF that happens to be true and we all see different things than one another but can only perceive what our individual minds know, then there is no point in debating, coz our minds would only be telling us what we can perceive. Not necessarily what someone else is saying.
-AC