Originally posted by Branlor SwiftThanos does have reaction feats. But they aren't as good as you think. They are against attacks that started from afar and some of them aren't really from stuff faster than Gladiator. Gladiator would be throwing fisticuffs and launching attacks from 3 feet away.
I know that you're not supposed to ignore every showing from the opposite side as well every showing from the guy you're defending in favor of non existent showings.I also know that you're not supposed to throw a hissy fit and leave the forum in a fit of rage because of an inability to prove a point.
But anyway, how does ignoring every single showing of Thanos (outside of two "low showings) fit into any sort of logic whatsoever? This is a board based off comics afterall. How does ignoring a large majority of things fit into that, even going by your logic?
The problem is that Thanos has acted to faster characters with better speed and combat showings.
Why would Thanos' superior speed be mentioned? Dumb question. No where in my argument am I saying he runs at the speed of light. I'm saying his reactions are good. And considering he knocks people away who actually use their speed, there's no need for a statement.
"I'm so quick, watch me blitz this dildo, oh no I'm being slapped away like a child."
That's what you expect apparently? You know how this also works? The guy getting slapped away with no words. It doesn't take Carver intellect to figure this out. Though apparently it takes more than you're capable of.So what, your argument is now shifting to a low feat from Thor where he stated he can't tag Wolverine and then grabbed his damn foot and swung him around like a ragdoll?
But yes, using one pis example is the way to go about saying all of Thanos' reaction feats are pis. Because this makes sense to you?
Anyway, it's been sufficiently showcased over the years that the Wolverine example was shitty writing. In many ways. Yet in reverse, it's been showcased over the years that Thanos' reactions aren't shit, so what are you going to do?
Although funnily enough your mention of Wolverine brings up another cute speed feat.
Here's Gladiator speeding trying to hit Iron Man getting snikted.
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Gladiator/Annihilators-Earthfall002-007.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Gladiator/Annihilators-Earthfall002-009.jpg🙂
But yes, numerous examples of Thanos' feats were just to appease people like me. Says the Sentry fan.
They don't count because the writers were just trying to get the fans like me to download their comics because Thanos had a speed showing. This passes as logic.
Or Thor and Thanos can tag beings because they can. Either conspiracy theory bullshit or they're capable of it. Pick a card.Yet, where are the Gladiator speed showings? ACTUAL SPEED SHOWINGS. Your only basis apparently is "nano second", yet when Surfer has the same kind of feats, and Thanos can tag Surfer...
You really are not looking for anything like proof. You have your mind made up, and it's based on the theory of just ignoring shit.If you're going to lie like you're basing shit on ACTUAL SPEED SHOWINGS, then why is your very same argument that stuff in comics doesn't count? It's like super hypocrisy mixed with dicks in the butt.
You're basing things on comics in one breath and then saying a large majority of comics don't count in the next. You want your cake, and then you want to ram it up your ass in the next.
Also, it seems you're having the most trouble with this aside from mental deficiencies because Thanos doesn't zoom around at light speed it seems. Which aside from being retarded, it's also ignoring reaction speed.
If that's purely your issue, I can show Thanos flying at high speeds to make you not look like an ignorant buffoon. We can put this all behind you like you're keen to do in a room full of guys.Agreed.
Now tell me what a non canon Gladiator and Superman's powers have to do with Gladiator. Throw more insults to disguise that you have a point if you need to concede here. Hopefully you leave the forum again in a huff and puff though.
Also congrats on large scale ignorance of a post. But I guess considering you're ignoring Thanos' reaction showings (all of them), it would make sense that you'd ignore large parts of posts that disprove your idiocy.
Hey, maybe by you being wrong about what's canon to Gladiator though can easily be remedied by ignoring it. That's the ticket. If you don't acknowledge it it didn't happen. Though maybe biasedly or not, this would work in my favor (just ignoring your post), considering you have literally no points but are just trying to get me to accept that comic feats don't count. I'll remember this next time you peddle some Sentry nonsense. 🙂
But anyway. Your argument is that Thanos doesn't have reaction feats because you don't like it. And that makes sense to you. Read that over and realize how stupid you are.
Gladiators fight with Hyperion is a showing for Gladiator.