Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Does Magneto have reactions that show him reacting to faster beings than Quicksilver?But anyway. You think Gladiator wins, but you continually say he will lose. Either pick a side or the other.
Point is clear Glads in character with no PIS at peak will loose eventually, IMO
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
It really doesn't matter what words you mince to get to the conclusion. All that matters is that Thanos has reacted to two people that are way faster than Gladiator.If you want to focus on the nanosecond aspect of it, that's on you. Whether what I'm arguing is indirectly that Thanos has nanosecond reaction speeds, I don't care. That's not my point.
What I'm saying is that Thanos can and has reacted to faster beings. The guy was slapping blasts out of Maker's hands, you don't think he'd be able to react to Gladiator "I take seconds to get there, but I apparently have nanosecond speed when I'm there"?
This whole focus on nanosecond is grinding. And the guy who wrote that doesn't even think beings can go faster than light in space, and if that's the case, it would make sense that they were simply going lightspeed in combat since light moves 12 inches in a nanosecond, and the punch was "nanoseconds" later.
So... lightspeed is what you're saying in other words in that instance.Ignoring ulterior motives. But your entire argument is based off a feeling anyway. It's not based off proof since that's being ignored on both sides. Thanos isn't nanosecond because it doesn't feel right. Yet he reacted to a guy that was pretty much moving at implied warp speed throughout the whole arc. But... that's to be ignored because Thanos having any sort of "nanosecond" reaction feat is stupid.
The whole "Thanos reacted to the fallen one who was portrayed as light speed therefore Thanos has light speed reaction" is a false dichotomy and honestly MOST of the scans shown fall into that category, imo
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
You really think the "no pis" rule works in favor of nanosecond reactions? For that to work you would have to literally override every single one of Gladiator's other feats. Every. Single. One. But no, yeah, every other feat except the word nanosecond is pis. Good work there. And yes, the entire first half of Starblast is pis except one word.However, if you're going to start dissecting segments of my post, it's very interesting you're ignoring the important part of this entire thread.
That PIS rule will apply to Gladiator performing poorly cs characters like Cannonball or Gambit or characters that have legit super speed not using it, because, well We know the comic will not last more than 3 pages
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
If this was a Superman thread you'd be all over this statement with a bunch of scans. But here you just ignore Gladiator's complete lack of adequate blitzing because it said nanosecond about him. And apparently everything else is pis.Not only that, but you just called something that happened in the exact same page pis. And that's that it took seconds for Gladiator to get to Hyperion. Which seems highly relevant when that's what Glads is going to need to do to Thanos.
Like I said Gladiator does not has the feats to support a win for him alone in here, he is a character made to loose mainly regardless of how powerful he might be, so of course no one in going to come up with scans. On that part I agree and this is the main reason why I think Thanos could win in here.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Yes, woah is Superman that his clone doesn't get a win over Thanos.
Nope. you got that quite wrong, if I entered here was mainly because of the PIS / CIS rule and the False dichotomies presented, not because Gladiator is a Superman clone
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
And I'm like 90 percent sure no one on the Thanos side cares about the clone of Superman thing. But it does seem to come in handy for defending Gladiator. I don't think you or Prof has ever argued on the side of Gladiator before this thread. H1 just hates Thanos so same old shit. And Enzeru is just trying to make Thanos out to be really slow so he can have Sentry blitz him in threads.
I have actually like a couple of times before, long time ago, I used to have a Glads sig BTW 😉
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
It's all ulterior motives here. All Thanos fans want is that Thanos beats the biggest jobber in comics. And it's become utterly retarded in the process when the Gladiator side refuses to post any proof to back up anything they say. But yes, woah is Superman. I'd love to see your reaction if h1, and a band of people were arguing for a decent length of time about Starfire beating Superman or something. And the only actual proof being used was a ****ing Tom Brevoort forumspring about Thor.Quite honestly, I don't remember a more pathetic argument on this forum for a while. And Carver tried to tell me the events of Infinity in the order of it happened, but at least he had proof. At least he didn't just try and say everything is pis but this word.
Nope, like I said before I came in here for other reasons
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
I'd get omniblasted by Thanos and killed.
At those relativistic speed perceptions you will actually see the energy building up in Thanos body, so you will react accordingly and what of his omni blast has killed a hereald? besides the Warlock one, because that was a prophecy to be fulfilled.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
So again, absolutely no proof is offered. Literally nothing. All you're using is nanoseconds, which works out to about lightspeed in that instance, and it's only lightspeed at close range since it took him seconds to traverse a couple miles in the same page. 😬Where is the scans on scans on scans to show Gladiator is capable of blitzing Thanos without him getting hit?
And onto the larger point.
And this is against a guy who's only ever been KO'ed twice in comics (one was Squirrel Girl if that makes it better, which it should). But suddenly we're to believe that a complete lack of winning fights from Gladiator suddenly allows him to beat Thanos? We're to believe that a lack of successful blitzes leads him to successfully blitz and finish off Thanos? Like where is the proof here?You readily accept that Gladiator is a big loser, but in the same breath you think he should be untouchable. Based on what evidence? I've repeatedly asked for proof, yet I've been given nothing.
Yeah this last point I agree, there is nothing to show in Glads favor as He rarely if any is successful on his comic book story in character at least nothing that I am aware off, but like I said this was not the main reason to come in here specifically to debate. And yes I think HE should be untouchable to Thanos in a cissless match, but like I said in here at Peak with out PIS he will loose in character he most likely will loose.