Muhammad Ali or Bruce Lee?

Yup. He was the shit.

Heres Quentin Tarantino speaking of Ice's studliness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyN8VN4BSzM

hehehe.....

😛

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Heres Quentin Tarantino speaking of Ice's studliness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyN8VN4BSzM

Hahaha, I remember seeing that film when it came out. Best scene of the entire movie.

Though Tarantino generally annoys me now.

Yeah I can understand folks being annoyed by him these days.
Death Proof was the crossing final event horizon of irritance for me.
If he disappeared up his own bottom any faster that he did at some point back when, he would cause a black hole.

Mad film assessment/Ice man assessment skills, though.

0.o.... Ali has more strength and weight, take more hits being a boxer and he's well conditioned as well as fast. Stats say ali, but polls point to Lee. Interesting....

A lot of people take the choreographed actions of movie stars as verbatim representation of the actor's real life abilities, I guess.

Lee is the more McClaneish of the two haermm

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Lee is the more McClaneish of the two haermm

Not even close, pal. It's a fact that under McClane's perfect and unblemished white skin is a layer of nigh-impenetrable back skin.

It depends on the setting. In a boxing match Ali is the obvious winner but in a free for all on a street corner Lee probably has the edge. The guy was an actor though, how proficient is he in a real fight?

Exactly.

Ali could grapple, kick, punch, strangle, whatever he liked outside the ring.

Makes me laugh that Ali would be expected to just stick to queensbury rules outside of the ring... Lee'd be likely doomed against Ali outside of the rules.

The rules of boxing would prevent such a bout taking place because of the massive weight/frame difference involved....more for Lee's sake more than Ali's... as the officials know what what happen to the smaller fighter, even against oppostion only half as good as Ali.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not even close, pal. It's a fact that under McClane's perfect and unblemished white skin is a layer of nigh-impenetrable back skin.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth

The rules of boxing would prevent such a bout taking place because of the massive weight/frame difference involved....more for Lee's sake more than Ali's... as the officials know what what happen to the smaller fighter, even against oppostion only half as good as Ali.

Tell that to David Haye.

There are always exceptions to the rule; that's not a completely fair comparison.

Valuev and Haye are both in the heavy weight class. Valuev's skill is shit compared to Haye's, he's more of a brute.

Bruce would stomp Ali in a real fight.

except that he really wouldn't

I've been over this argument a thousand and one times. I've looked at it rationally, irrationally, realistically, subjectively, hypothetically and the answer everytime is, undoubtedly that Bruce Lee Wins...,EVERYTIME!. Anyone who answers otherwise is a, know nothing communist ass hole

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
I've been over this argument a thousand and one times. I've looked at it rationally, irrationally, realistically, subjectively, hypothetically and the answer everytime is, undoubtedly that Bruce Lee Wins...,EVERYTIME!. Anyone who answers otherwise is a, know nothing communist ass hole

Actor/Martial-Artist(practically untested, no less) Vs. World Heavyweight Boxing Champion/one of the highest regarded figthers of all time.

Yet you pick the actor, lame, you're lame.

seems like a decent thread to ask this in:

I've always liked savat, and I know in one of the first UFC tournaments a savat fighter got to the finals (he was also fighting with a broken hand), but I have seen little of it in MMA otherwise.

Does it just not convert into MMA? is it not ground oriented enough? lol, I may have asked something like this before, but no memory here.