Originally posted by BUSTER1
Ignorant and bias?? see what i mean -Jinzin you are a fanboy.
And what evidence could you possibly put forth to help prove that claim?...
A fanboy is outside the scope of reason, I however don't fall into that category. I simply use evidence which EXISTS to help me prove my points instead of calling "PIS" on everything I don't agree with.
Now, what you're failing to realize is that your claim to fanboyism really doesn't invalidate my claims and perspectives based soley on a title alone... You've done nothing more than lay down a red herring in the hopes that calling me a fanboy will keep you from having to support your claims... It doesn't.
Sorry, but if you honestly think that Wolverine can't take brick punches, or wheather a thunderclap in spite of multitudes of evidence then you're being either ignorant or bias... There is no other option. 😐
Originally posted by BUSTER1
I try and explain why i think the Thing can beat Wolverine, even stating how Wolverine can beat Thing, saying how out of 10 fights they take 5 each-and you call me biased!!!
Yes... because frankly you think (Or so you've implied) that the only way Logan can take the majority from Thing is by way of PIS... Which is absurd...
Logan is faster than Grimm, more skilled, more agile, can take more punishment from Thing than the other way around, has more potential to one shot Thing than the other way around, has better damage soak feats than Thing does, has more experience, has better reflexes, and frankly more of a killer instinct....
It's a pretty far cry away from PIS to assume that Logan could take the majority over thing..Especially since he HAS. 😐
And you're reasoning for giving Thing even an even split is skewed as hell...
A thunderclap WILL disorient him enough for Thing to take advantage? Even though out of four instances, only ONE even comes close to supporting that claim and EVEN THEN Wolverine wasn't disporiented enough for the Hulk to actually connect?
I don't think so.
You're talking about a man who has fought along side, AND against friggin BANCHEE. A thunderclap won't have more effect than Benchee's scream.. and what did Wolverine do when Banchee screamed at him? He waded through the scream and punched him out...
You're giving the benefit to the thunderclap IN SPITE of multitudes of evidence that dictates otherwise...
Bias or ignorant.
How about the fact that you call PIS on Wolverine being uneffected by the thunderclap... you didn't even state WHY all you did was give it a title and hope that was enough... just like now calling me a fanboy... And as like now, it wasn't.
There's already been several healing factor related explanations for why Wolverine's capible of brushing off thunderclaps and there's no good argument yet provided to counter them.
Originally posted by BUSTER1
Asfor my comment that Wolvie can cut most of the bricks "these days" -i said that b'cos in his 1st appearance against the Hulk, he couldn't cut him. But like i said you are a fanboy,
And like I said, you're ignorant...
That was ONE appearance.. in which he actually cut the living crap out of another brick anyways (Wendigo), aside from that, that wasw retconned the very next meeting that Wolverine had with Hulk.
Trying to suggest that Wolverine's only able to cut bricks "these" days is incredibly ignorant on your behalf.. the fact that you would use his first appearance in which he DID cut up a brick and rotconned later to have cut both is nothing more than validation of that fact.
Originally posted by BUSTER1
and you have trouble taking it in when some suggests that Wolverine isn't unbeatable
Appeal to Non-Sequitur. Your conclussion doesn't follow the premise.
I didn't say Wolverine was unbeatable..
And Wolverine doesn't have to be NEAR unbeatable to beat Thing...
What I've been having problems with here however, has relatively little to do with what you think the outcome of the fight would be but rather WHY you think it would be that way... Because being bias and/or ignorant on the matter doesn't leave you much room to make claims about these characters without looking quite the arse.
Originally posted by BUSTER1
My apologies to the likes of Masterbruce and any one else who actually speaks sense,
HA!
And your not bias?.. Grouping Masterbruce into the category of "actually speaking sense"... That kid ignores more facts than you do ten times over.
He dismisses evidence based on the quality of artwork alone.
😐
That makes sense?
Originally posted by BUSTER1
for not being here to back you up against these narrow minded fanboys, but it was Saturday night and i was busy
Ah yes, and once again appealing to Ad-Hominem when you're arguments alone just don't cut it... I don't know what you possibly could have contributed if you HAD been here so you probably shouldn't sweat it.
And, it's kind of hard not to be narrow minded about FACTS. 😐