Michael Jackson Trial Discussion

What I believe does not matter Kharma, I respect the rule of law.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
So do you believe that the law is 100% right about everything?

Not necessarily, but not one of us were in the courtroom and heard every piece of evidence presented. Only those that were got the full story and have the right to say the verdict was incorrect.

Michael Jackson was found not guilty by a jury. In my eyes, he is not guilty.

Originally posted by BackFire
Now, let's take bets on how long it takes before he has charges brought upon him again.

hope he wasnt speeding along that highway to the courts cause it wont be too far

Well BF, seeing as people are ALREADY trying to suggest faults in the verdict, I'd say now.

It's not going to end.

-AC

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Not necessarily, but not one of us were in the courtroom and heard every piece of evidence presented. Only those that were got the full story and have the right to say the verdict was incorrect.

Michael Jackson was found not guilty by a jury. In my eyes, he is not guilty.

for now.

The verdict was the right one based on the evidence provided.

Originally posted by whirlysplat
The verdict was the right one based on the evidence provided.

true..true..

The thing that would of done it for me is to see the WHOLE trial televised.. Just like the Timothy MacVey trial wasn't. You can't be 100% sure until you do.

Originally posted by whirlysplat
What I believe does not matter Kharma, I respect the rule of law.

😄

Originally posted by Mainstream
for now.

No, forever. Sure he may molest a child and go to trial again, but in this case, Michael Jackson is not guilty.

No forensic, No corroboration = Not Guilty............. Anywhere where the rule of law functions correcctly.

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
No, forever. Sure he may molest a child and go to trial again, but in this case, Michael Jackson is not guilty.

It terrifies me that you find solice in that.

Originally posted by whirlysplat
No forensic, No corroboration = Not Guilty............. Anywhere where the rule of law functions correcctly.

Not true. coughScottPetersoncough.

Perfect Answer Oswald, it would cause people to doubt the verdict was correct, but he would remain not guilty

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
No, forever. Sure he may molest a child and go to trial again, but in this case, Michael Jackson is not guilty.

Kharma is correct in his literal words though.

Nobody knows for absolute sure unless there is some ultra condemning evidence.

I do think that people, after 15 years, need to get lives though.

-AC

fair point

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Not true. coughScottPetersoncough.

No one disagrees that noone knows 😄

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Kharma is correct in his literal words though.

Nobody knows for absolute sure unless there is some ultra condemning evidence.

I do think that people, after 15 years, need to get lives though.

-AC

Originally posted by KharmaDog
It terrifies me that you find solice in that.

So, kharma, you know for a fact that Michael Jackson has molested children? You have seen him do this act? You were molested by Michael Jackson? Tell me how you know for a fact that Michael Jackson is guilty.

As for the rule of law, when justice is truly blind and not subject to monetary influence or the influence of fame or social position, then I will respect it.

Anyways, I'm glad this trial is over so I don't have to hear about it anymore.