Michael Jackson Trial Discussion

i know i just heard

I find that to be great. Although I predicted it for some odd reason.

There are two threads about this in the GDF already.

Wow.....I kind of wanted him to be guilty....

cool. much like the south park episode. except mike didn't melt this time.

I swear some people couldn't get lives if they were on 5 for 1 at Wal-Mart.

-AC

I dont think so jaden. He's a good guy, just freaky is all. Nothing that has been done can ever change his music and talents.

wonder if he'll be deemed innocent the next time around.

Sorry to be a wet blanket once again, but the term courts use is NOT GUILTY.

The term innocent is never used !

Besides that another term used is Cleared, which doesnt mean he is innocent at all.
One gets cleared from the charges brought against him or her cause there would be holes all over the prosecution's case.

It was not proven beyond reasonable doubt and could not be on that evidence. The decision was the correct one.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
It must be bliss living in a world that is so black and white, where you can believe and accept anything that the politicians or a jury of your peers tells you as fact.

But don't you find it odd that there was more physical evidence to prove O.J. Simpson guilty than there was to prove Peterson guilty?

The system does not work all the time, it is based on the premise that:

1. All people will tell the truth when on the witness stand.

2. That jury members actually have a clue about the law and will not let their personal biases affect their judgement.

The law is made to be black and white. You are either guilty of a crime or not guilty.

1. Not telling the truth on the witness stand is perjury and there is a law for just that occurence.

2. Juries are instructed in the law and directed in what they are or are not take into consideration when deliberating.

The system is not perfect in every single way, but it is the best system for determining guilt. The system works all the time even if there are times that the verdict was not correct.

In this case, it is a FACT that Michael Jackson is not guilty.

We live under the rule of law in England, Canada and the US

Just another day in America.

Maybe now he'll stop sleeping with Kids.

There wont be any next time round, rages.
I find truth in what everyone is saying, but we have no REAL evidence that he DID or DID NOT do anything with those kids. Its just the fact of Michael's words and I dont think he'd lie.

oswald do u really believe the system is infallable

this trial is so sad 🙁

Originally posted by leowyatt
michael jackson was found not guilty on all 10 accounts

Been watchin the trial/interviews/videos all afternoon! I heard Jackson is going to step up and do a few interviews after its all through! 😄 Cant wait. I want to hear what he has to say.

Originally posted by a1hsauce
oswald do u really believe the system is infallable

The criminal judicial system itself provides the best way to determine innocence or guilt in a civilized manner.

To answer your question, no the system is not infallable, but it is quite effective. Public opinion is the problem, not the system itself.

Wait your all happy, one of my associates saw a very handsome check in the pocket of the defense attorney when he walked in. But when he tried to pick pocket him...it was gone 😏