Michael Jackson Trial Discussion

this case was so weak to even begin with. the thing that backfired for the prosecution was not the mother only(who was a horrible witness), but the timeline of the case didnt make any sense. i think thomas mesereau conveyed the message well to the jurors that mj could not have been stupid enough to molest the kid after the controversial documentary. and the CONSPIRACY charge was so weak i mean any1 could see the holes in that. besides michael jackson didnt have much to do with that anyway as the prosecution saw it. BAD BAD CASE.
i am sorry but i just dont get it.. NO CLOCKS AT NEVERLAND? THERE IS A BIG-A$$ CLOCK just outside. its ridiculous. the child welfare society also concluded that there were no charges to be found even then sneddon thought there was something in it.
i am a hardcore michael jackson fan, and i have been all my life. but 1 can clearly see that the prosecution had a bad case and mj didnt molest the kid. no physical evidence, too many plotholes.

mj may be looked as weird, he is odd yes. but he is not a criminal. michael jackson is an easy target, and he does push the self-destruct button but he is clearly innocent of these charges as i said since the day the prosecution raided neverland.

peace

Sure.

The Arvisos themselves may not have had a case that was credible in court in the end... But the verdict does not mean that he is innocent of everything in his life....

The man showers and sleeps with with boys as young as eight... A previous allegation was proven as showing that the accuser could perfectly describe the distinct markings on the underside of MJs erect penis, the man has pictures of nude boys in his house, he has constantly displayed patternistic behavior in befriending pre-pubescent boys and then soon as they grow up the obsessive behavior magically stops, he only likes boys (Who he supplies porn to/allows access to)
He targets age and situation specific cases young boys with no father around/or where the father can be easily undermined and he befriends the mother to the extent to where he can convince the mom to allow him to sleep with her child.

Other things ive found troubling:

He is NOT a kid.... He is a sexually active adult. Even if the much debated marriages fail to prove it, then the porn does.
Kids dont have sex drives. He does....

I also can't for the life of me accept that troubled youth maybe with some beatings=A licence to behave the way he does...
So many people have a simliar childhood of being beaten...Yet how many of them feel the need to sleep with children as a result..?
That childhood bit has been used to death and isn't even valid in the first place IMO...

"People only have 'persecuted' MJ because he is rich and famous"

Well. Why wasn't it Tom Cruise on trial? Doesnt Speilberg qualify as rich enough or famous enough? Hell why not Quentin Tarantino or Robert Plant? The answer is obvious. None of them act like a peodophile.
MJ deserves to be inspected closely because of his actions and their total suspiciousness...

No-one should be berrated for having doubts about the verdict or MJ himself... It is only natural... Likewise anyone still convinced of his innocence of everything in his life, fine... Each to their own.

You won't ever see me accepting this behavior from a 40+ yr old man though... Act like a peodophile, get tried as a peodophile.

Ah well... Just my tuppence worth.

finti.. i am shocked by what u have said, coming from some 1 i respect a lot
the judicial system is as close as you can get to the truth, no1 can never know the truth, only accuser and mj know.

but frankly speaking, you have to back up with what you said finti. i mean, yes mj does have odd habbits, but they are not criminal, they are ODD. they are not enough to convict a man of sexual abuse. the jury looked into evidence from past as well as this case, this was certainly a fair trial with 12 simple minded jurors, and basically there was no real evidence to support that mj was a child molester. therefore mj is innocent or NOT GUILTY by the court of law, and that is the BOTTOM LINE. but i guess opinions are opinions, and they must always be welcomed.

sadako of girth... his actions are CERTAINLY suspicious, i can safely say that... but they have been investigated in this trial, his whole life has been exposed, its eccentric its weird, its ODD, but its not criminal, and it couldnt be proven that he molested the kid. on past issues is a debate.. but they never went to court, therefore we will never know

Juror #1 was just interviewed and said that after reviewing all of the evidence of the other molestation charges brought up against MJ (which the jury was required to do) he (as well as other jurors) has no doubt that MJ has indeed sexually molested young boys in the past.

He said that the facts in this case were no as concrete as in previous cases, so that he had to vote not guilty.

So for all of you who love MJ and think that he would never do such a think, people who are privy to the evidence are quite sure that he's a molester, but that they had to let him go in this case.

Sleepover at Michael's tonight!

As I have stated in the other thread concerning MJ, Juror #1 was just interviewed and said that after reviewing all of the evidence of the other molestation charges brought up against MJ (which the jury was required to do) he (as well as other jurors) has no doubt that MJ has indeed sexually molested young boys in the past.

He said that the facts in this case were no as concrete as in previous cases, so that he had to vote not guilty.

So if you do respect the opinions of the jury, then you have to accept that Michael Jackson is a child molester, but a child molester who rich enough to pay off the accusers that could have had him put in jail, and lucky enough to go to trial with an accuser where the prosecution couldn't make it's case.

This all makes me think, if many in the jury think that he has moleted before, then how must those children (who are now adults) feel when they see everyone cheering the guy who molested them?

I still geting over him being proven innocent since I do not think he is.But he is off the hook just like OJ was a while back.JM

Originally posted by Jackie Malfoy
I still geting over him

Alot of kids are saying that.

Originally posted by botankus
Alot of kids are saying that.

I think they are more likely saying that they are still getting over being under him.

I wanted him to be guilty because this is a very serious crime and thinking about it makes me wanna throw up. I mean hes ver weirdknow a days and isnt his usual self. Oh well I know where he is going when he dies 😈 ..... I'll meet you at the darkside my little prince of pop.

Come on, sing it with me....

* Don't let the son go down on meeeee *

His career and reputation is ruined, either way.

F*CKING GUILTY!!!!!!!! THATS WHAT HE SHOUOLD OF BEEN!!!

Yeah, I agree.

Whenever anyone tries to change his face to look like Diana Ross, that can't lead to good things.

indeed

I'm sure you all have lives to be getting on with?

Right?

You're acting like republicans when Clinton got elected.

Jesus. Let it go.

-AC

Originally posted by leowyatt
michael jackson was found not guilty on all 10 accounts

Originally posted by s|m
I heard that. But it's a little odd, don't you think 😑?

amazing what fame and money can do huh?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm sure you all have lives to be getting on with?

Right?

You're acting like republicans when Clinton got elected.

Jesus. Let it go.

-AC

On more than one occasion you have told people that what Michael Jackson has done or not done is of no relevance to them, that's it's none of their business, and that it's over and they should stop talking about it.

People will talk about it, I have and probably will continue talk about it. People discussing a topic that you find unpalatable are well within' their right to do so. If you do not like it, avoid the thread.

There was a thread about "nuking iraq". I thought it was stupid, so I did not post in it or pay attention to it. If you don't like people discussing a topic, then avoid the discussion.