serious though he was so popular with thriller and i wonder who did it get to this.
Guys the accusers mother was such a stupid person. She lost the case herself.
Okay i doubt that a mega all time popular celebrity will ever get charged for a serious crime. With so much media coverage and Jackson being a household name the jury could never make a good fair decision.
What do you mean?
I agree on the second sentence there, the interviews keep going on and on about more information on her past history and what she's like now. She's a big part of why Jackson was on trial, I can feel it.
I believe they did what they had to do. I mean, everyone's treated fairly (in my opinion) when on trial, whether they're a 100 billion dollar pop singer, or in 100 billion dollars worth ot dept..
Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
No opinions are more valuable than another.
If you honestly believe that, than there's not much point in discussing anything with you.
There are valid opinions, and invalid opinions. I would respect the opinion of someone who thought about the subject, researched it and came to a conclusion than an opinion that someone spouts merely to fill in a void of silence.
Woould you trust an opinion of one over another? If so that opinion has more value than another. Buth this is waayyyyyy off topic.
Can't say I'm suprised...
It really coulda gone both ways, They coulda crucifyed him like they did with Martha Steward. But I guess it really had nothing to draw attention away from, MS drew attention away from Enron.
Do I personally believe he did it?
Yes, sure. I have no doubts, whether there was some foul play or just a shitty prosecutors I dunno...
Originally posted by KharmaDog
If you honestly believe that, than there's not much point in discussing anything with you.There are valid opinions, and invalid opinions. I would respect the opinion of someone who thought about the subject, researched it and came to a conclusion than an opinion that someone spouts merely to fill in a void of silence.
Woould you trust an opinion of one over another? If so that opinion has more value than another. Buth this is waayyyyyy off topic.
I'm speaking in the overall scheme of things. Just because you hold value of an opinion does not mean that the person next to you feels the opinion is valuable. And most people only value the opinions that are similar to their own. And in this case, the only opinion that matters is the opinion of the twelve jurors. They heard more testimony and saw more evidence than both of us and came to a decision. So, like you said, "I would respect the opinion of someone who thought about the subject, researched it and came to a conclusion." It's just funny how the armchair jurors suddenly come out in droves to slam the system when they disagree with the decision. And no, that is not a knock at you. Taking away the comments, I can see your point of view. I just have a different opinion. Now let's just shake and make up.
well i think he's guilty as sin but that aside i think they still should give a punishment something like putting him behind a glass wall and let him look but dont touch but of couse give him some carnaval rides so he doesnt get board since he's such a big kid. i guess they would have to let him out at least once a week so he could have more plastic surgery(janet's becoming more prettier then him and boy we cant have that now can we) we wouldnt want him to be deprived of one of his favorite things in life.
i told all of you from the begining that mj was innocent of the charges, whine all you want now... the truth has been told, and there is nothing you can do about it. because the court of law is as close to the truth as you can go.. the real thing is only known between mj and the accuser
therefore you people should eat your words now.. its a pity you people were so biased towards michael jackson.