People can have a relationship without it resulting to sex. a platonic relationship.
The reason I asked is because I heard something on TV a few days/weeks back that a certain protestant group was going to allow gay people to live together as long as they didn't have sex.
Something like that.... Don't quote me on this!
If you don't want to answer my questions because you feel they are too personal just tell me, you don't have to answer
Originally posted by Fire
People can have a relationship without it resulting to sex. a platonic relationship.The reason I asked is because I heard something on TV a few days/weeks back that a certain protestant group was going to allow gay people to live together as long as they didn't have sex.
Something like that.... Don't quote me on this!If you don't want to answer my questions because you feel they are too personal just tell me, you don't have to answer
I would say that a platonic relationship is not wrong. However, you'll get other Christians who will say that homosexuality is A-OK in the Bible (*cough* Catholics *cough*) and others that carry around signs that say "God hates fags".
According to the Bible, neither of these views is true.
Well being a european and that giving me the chance to see the pope on tv almost every week I know that not all catholics believe that homosexuality is ok.
But a lot of the Catholics have indeed grown to accept Homosexuality, as I do.
Here we differe from opinion, but I trust in time you will agree with my idea that the camp is pretty bad.
Originally posted by Fire
Well being a european and that giving me the chance to see the pope on tv almost every week I know that not all catholics believe that homosexuality is ok.But a lot of the Catholics have indeed grown to accept Homosexuality, as I do.
Here we differe from opinion, but I trust in time you will agree with my idea that the camp is pretty bad.
Once again, though, this isn't the point of the thread.
Actually, one of my friends who is a fairly serious Christian said that (lemme quote what she said) "Anyway, being gay is NOT a sin. Most christians seem to think that being gay IS indeed a sin but really it isn't. In God's eyes being gay is immoral."
(that's precisely what she said)
Anyway, I don't think it should be anyone elses business, if someone is gay, let them be, it doesn't in any way bother you so why should you care? What makes it your business?
Im a christian! sort of... well I was raised catholic but KMC totally turned me over 😂 nah just kidding I stopped believing a while ago, and well christians do not find immoral a sin, it's just- well... immoral. 😬
But I think in the bible it says something like: he who lies with a man as a man lies with a woman is comitting a sin or something like that... its all very confusing I mean cant the bible just say
homosexuality: SIN/NOT SIN
abortion: SIN/NOT SIN
etc. it'd be a heck lot easier for convos like this
Originally posted by IceWithin
Im a christian! sort of... well I was raised catholic but KMC totally turned me over 😂 nah just kidding I stopped believing a while ago, and well christians do not find immoral a sin, it's just- well... immoral. 😬
But I think in the bible it says something like: he who lies with a man as a man lies with a woman is comitting a sin or something like that... its all very confusing I mean cant the bible just say
homosexuality: SIN/NOT SIN
abortion: SIN/NOT SIN
etc. it'd be a heck lot easier for convos like this
NAUGHTY!
Originally posted by Darth Revan
LOL, but I don't think they'd even thought to do abortions back then 😑
Originally posted by FeceMan
You are correct about that, but the Bible uses lots of phrases (sinful/immoral/wicked/etc.) and they all mean one thing:NAUGHTY!
IceWithin is correct; they have had abortions for a very long time.
But how are christians supposed to know that if what they're doing is simply uncool or is a reason for you to burn in hell?
of course I am