Master Court
Senior Member
Originally posted by h1a8
10ft is too much room actually. Spider-man only needed 5ft to dance all around Hulk in multiples where Hulk couldn't touch him. Plus you forgot the combo to ko. If Superman is comboing Hulk then who cares how much room there is. Going by best feats Superman is far stronger than Thor, Gladiator, any version of Hulk, Sentry, etc. This is your proof.Thor holds back (especially against Hulk). Sentry stalemating Galactus is not accepted for it wasn't shown and considered PIS anyway. We also don't accept Spider-man beating Firelord (and that was actually shown). Again by best feats Superman is clearly stronger than all top tiers and heralds. In Namor's respect thread there is a scan of Namor koing Hulk in one punch in the water, knocking him out cold and turning him back to Banner. If Hulk acts while Superman is comboing him then it wasn't a combo by definition. The combo to ko principle was violated. To achieve the combo to ko
1. One must be powerful enough to jar(stun) with a blow
2. One must be quick enough to land another jarring blow before the previous stun effect from the first wears off.
If these two requirements are met then the opponent would never be able to act and will be comboed to ko.
If you are not convinced then:
Each hit by Superman can stun Hulk for at least a second. Superman can punch many times per second. Thus stipulations 1 and 2 are met and Superman can combo Hulk to ko. The problem is it is impossible to get angry when one is stunned.
I get it. You don't know what you're talking about.
Combo to ko, Superman is stronger than everyone just because you say so, and you're even taking Thor's words out of context in the classic fashion of those that have poor arguments.
I'm done talking with you. You don't accept facts, you don't understand logic, you misinterpret almost everything you use as debating material.
I read as far as "Thor always holds back, especially against Hulk." That sent up all the red flags that I was trying to debate with a jobber with a one-size fits all debate. All that combo to ko crap. Like Thor would hold back against a guy that has beaten Hercules and Gladiator almost to death. Both of them had their asses saved by outside intereference. And, of course, Thor has admitted that Hercules is a slightly better fighter than himself. Now I'm not saying Hulk is a better fighter than Thor. But if Hulk can batter a rival of Thor's, and by Thor's own admission Hulk is stronger than him, there's no logical reason why Thor would hold back all the time and in every single fight they've ever had, nor did Thor even say anything like that. The fact is, they didn't elaborate. Thor could've just as well meant he knows Hulk is not always to blame. But Thor is certainly not holding back when he hollars sh*t like "I will defeat thee!", and then can't defeat him.
And, of course, Red Hulk, whom Thor swore to kill, kicked the sh*t out of Thor, and apparently even had ample opportunity and power to kill him. Why would Thor hold back against a Hulk he intends to kill? Or hold back against a Hulk that is not really as powerful as the Green Hulk? And Thor got his nuts stomped in. So if we're gonna get lame about this, I have no beef about using the stomping Thor got from Red Hulk. So, Red Hulk stomped Thor just as easily as he stomped Hulk. And later, Thor and Hulk got their's back by owning Red Hulk. Seems Thor and Hulk are pretty even on the tier chart. Except Hulk's stronger and Thor has more power.
In any case, I'm not gonna keep debating with someone who is too stuck on their own understanding of things and unwilling to accept that they may be wrong. I'm stubborn as all Hell but even I accept the facts once in a while.
Good luck with the combo to ko crap. No one's gonna take your sh*t seriously if you keep doing that.
THE END!!