The Spirit of Humanity is Compassion

Started by debbiejo8 pages

Originally posted by whirlysplat
That will be my dyslexia just like Albeart E kicking in, by the way Bardock its about and not aboot😄

nitpicking last bastion 😄

So like me they are all simple 😄

Albert was pulled out of school.....and became a self taught homeschooler....as did Edison......seee what school does to a person....Destroys real thinkers......Albert was way too cool.

Originally posted by whirlysplat
Again you mistake aspiration for failiure imo

"What wisdom can you find that is greater than kindness?"
— Jean-Jacques Rousseau, French philosopher (1712-1778)

Can you just answer my question

Originally posted by Fishy
Wait back up take a step back...

Whirly you said you weren't argueing about something I just have on question for you.

Do you believe people do things that are not selfish?

I will answer that with this😄

The greatest pleasure I know is to do a good action by stealth, and to have it found out by accident."
— Charles Lamb, English essayist (1775-1834)

Originally posted by debbiejo
Albert was pulled out of school.....and became a self taught homeschooler....as did Edison......seee what school does to a person....Destroys real thinkers......Albert was way too cool.

Yes...well John Stuart Mill was better 😛 ......why do you bring it back to Albert again and again though?

Originally posted by whirlysplat
I will answer that with this😄

The greatest pleasure I know is to do a good action by stealth, and to have it found out by accident."
— Charles Lamb, English essayist (1775-1834)

Dude seriously...we want your Opinion not the Opinion of Philosophers and Scientists...we can read aboot the,....now you are the man..you can say what you think...use the chance

I believe sometimes people do things for others wishing nothing in return😄 What we do for ourselves fades quickly, what we do for others lives on in them 😄 imo good enough?

-Whirly

Originally posted by whirlysplat
I believe sometimes people do things for others wishing nothing in return😄 What we do for ourselves fades quickly, what we do for others lives on in them 😄 imo good enough?

-Whirly

You mean nothing in return from the person they help...or nothing in return at all?....

A simple yes or no would have done, but this is just as good...

No use to argue anymore, we already agree. You have never nor will ever do anything selfless

I think most people do things out of greed, even helping others.

Originally posted by Fishy
A simple yes or no would have done, but this is just as good...

No use to argue anymore, we already agree. You have never nor will ever do anything selfless

One must care about a world one will never see.”
— Bertrand Russell, British mathematician and philosopher (1872-1970)

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
I think most people do things out of greed, even helping others.

Some on each side........greed and not.....depends on your character....but still.........

Re: The Spirit of Humanity is Compassion

Originally posted by whirlysplat
I am not a religious person. I do though believe in certain moral codes, at the heart of my beliefs is compassion for my fellow man. I believe most people are good people, regardless of race, religion, creed, class or colour. I believe all should be equal. I also believe most people know whats right and whats wrong. I believe the real conspiracy in the world at the moment is unconscious, it is not controlled by anyone, but is a product of advertising, the isolationist way many of us live and work at times, and the distance we feel from each other. The result of this is a cold unloving world for many, where as long as they are OK then they no longer care about others, this was highlighted to me by the reactions of some on this board to the London bombings. They are cash rich but emotionally poor.

Am I right?

So at last you understand this fishy😄

The Real Nietzsche and his real views on morals

"My brother, when thou hast a virtue, and it is thine own virtue, thou hast
it in common with no one.

To be sure, thou wouldst call it by name and caress it; thou wouldst pull
its ears and amuse thyself with it.

And lo! Then hast thou its name in common with the people, and hast become
one of the people and the herd with thy virtue!

Better for thee to say: "Ineffable is it, and nameless, that which is pain
and sweetness to my soul, and also the hunger of my bowels."

Let thy virtue be too high for the familiarity of names, and if thou must
speak of it, be not ashamed to stammer about it.

Thus speak and stammer: "That is MY good, that do I love, thus doth it
please me entirely, thus only do _I_ desire the good.

Not as the law of a God do I desire it, not as a human law or a human need
do I desire it; it is not to be a guide-post for me to superearths and
paradises.

An earthly virtue is it which I love: little prudence is therein, and the
least everyday wisdom.

But that bird built its nest beside me: therefore, I love and cherish it--
now sitteth it beside me on its golden eggs."

Thus shouldst thou stammer, and praise thy virtue.

Once hadst thou passions and calledst them evil. But now hast thou only
thy virtues: they grew out of thy passions."

If you didn't get that...here's it for short...if you have your morals like them, but they are for you not for anything else, have your virtues because you want them......

Unfortunately he takes the view humans are intrinsically selfish and create morals from this selfishness (a very christian point of view). Rather than the other view equally valid from people like Lao Tzu, Gandhi, Eiestein that people are naturally selfless it is the material world that makes them selfish. I didn't bother arguing this point yesterday.

When you are content to be simply yourself and don’t compare or compete, everybody will respect you. - Lao-Tzu

i just enjoyed finding pro Nazi passages in an egomaniacs works😄

Originally posted by whirlysplat
i just enjoyed finding pro Nazi passages in an egomaniacs works😄

They are not pro Nazi..since the Nazis didn't exist back then...and why did you do it although you read his book...you know what way he meant it and you still take his passages out of context..it is just pathetic....

No your right he helped form the philosophy of Hitler 😄

His sister seemed to think thats how they were meant😄

Originally posted by whirlysplat
No your right he helped form the philosophy of Hitler 😄

Yes....he did....not on purpose though....

Originally posted by whirlysplat
His sister seemed to think thats how they were meant😄

Possible, but his sister just wasn't the genius he was.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes....he did....not on purpose though....

Possible, but his sister just wasn't the genius he was.....

she knew him better than you or me🙂