Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince - Book 2005

Started by tigress31 pages

i felt betrayed all this time waiting it was a good plot but was let down I felt that it was rushed too, and what was with the time jumping she never did that in the first five at least the chapters followed on so much was left out and whats with the bloody savage warewolf talk about eeeeeeeeeep i had the childrens version it was still to gorey my 6 year old wants me to read it to her there aint no way in hell im reading it to her yet shell freak out,

Yeah, I'm rethinking reading these books to my 7 year old. She can read them when she's 12 or 13.

I totally agree im reading COS to her at the moment im stopping after poa there is no way im going futher than that with her yet

Yeah, after that it just gets creepy and too complicated for a child to comprehend. I tried to explain some things to her about it, but she just doesn't seem to get it and she's becoming more easily distracted the further into the first book that we get.

I think we'll wait.

I dun blame ya, mines to curious though ive had to miss some bits out already lol

About the Unbreakable Vow thing Snape didnt have to do it at first...he could have found a way to get out of...or not help her at all...asuring Narcissa that Draco could do it....but helping him in the end if he had to... sorry i just cant accept the fact that even if he HAD to he killed him noup wont do for me

Originally posted by iluvsirius
hahah nice one DarkCanadian...

ehem back to business... After finishing the book and after drying all my tears... I went in shock I mean im still in shock😱 ...this book...was....emm...unexpected... This is the first Harry Potter book that left me with a little sting of disappointment🙁 ...First off...

I cant believe Harry broke up with ginny that was one of the saddest part of all...cant accept it..no...uh uh...no way! She should have said " No Harry I dont care, ill be with you always no matter what even if Voldemort does kill me, ill die happy cause i know i did it for you!!"..no? ok sorry guys got a little emotional there...🙄

Snape you dirty BIG bastard (and an extension of all the things i want to say but could only find being bastard the only pretty word right now) You should rot in hell with voldy...no wait.. hell will spit you back for being so evil and killing the greatest wizard of all time( Dumbly R. I. P, we love ya)...cant still soak what he did...thats part of the shock

Ron why didnt you friggin kissed Hermy!? damn you had lots of chances what r u wating for? your moms blessing?....But after all, it was good seeing more clearly that they really love each other but arent ready for it now...its ok ill pass that one...😛

Each book that goes by it gets more and more tragic...this one being the most tragic and unexpected of all...I cant imagine the least what is in store for Harry, Ron and Hermione(probably Ginny, which i doubt) in book 7...Rowling has proved herself a magnificent writer but please back off on the tragicnesss it caused me a whole box of kleenex last night and a still runny nose and some mental problems cause you messed with my head with that book😠... It was great but i felt like it changed the happy magical world(book 6 n 7 should be rated PG-13 cause i couldnt imagine myself at twelve reading that...i would have cried worse and tore the book in half, nasty temper i had) and now the last book is gonna be darker than all the books, probably no Hogwarts so no subejects in school no happy moments, more wars, so more deaths, and a journey to the dark and dangerous road to kill Voldemort and the "priiiince"(damn them).

Oh gosh didnt realize i wrote this much...sorry if I bored you but i had to write some of it down or ill explode( and believe me not a pretty sight) plz write back and express how you feel... I NEED MORAL SUPPORT!! 😱

When you say Ginny, which you probably doubt.... You do realize that she'll sneak along with them, right? And seriously, I think they book pulled out all right. And remember, it is just a book!

Originally posted by Luna150
So closed minded...

Hagrid overheared dumbledore and snape arguing, maybe because dumbledore was telling him he might have to kill him.

Also if snape didn't kill him snape would have died because of the unbreakable vow.

And notice the choise of words dumbledore used?
He didn't say 'Severus no' or 'severus don't' he said 'Severus.. Please'.

Im sticking to this theory, SNAPE FOREVER!

Likewise.

Originally posted by DarkCanadian
So you still think he's a spy for the good side even though he murdered Dumbledore and every single one of Dumbledore's followers wants his entrails to be slung up and paraded around the castle?

And why did Slughorn call Ron 'Rupert'?

Yes and he called him Rupert because he didn't remember his name.

Originally posted by iluvsirius
About the Unbreakable Vow thing Snape didnt have to do it at first...he could have found a way to get out of...or not help her at all...asuring Narcissa that Draco could do it....but helping him in the end if he had to... sorry i just cant accept the fact that even if he HAD to he killed him noup wont do for me
You all are acting like a bunch of children! Upset that Dumbledore died, and that is confusing you from thinking of anything but bad thoughts of Snape, well its time to grow up and think clearly. Dumbledore had to die. Harry needed a reason to leave school and Dumbledore was the reason he even stayed. JKR is trying to mix your thoughts up on Snape and such. Well, get over it. Snape is still good, even if he killed Dumbledore. I agree that the fighting between Snape and Dumbledore was about Snape HAVING to kill him.

i still think snape is a git

If Snape is still good, why did he use and unforgiveable curse on Harry, and why did he set Hagrids hut on fire?

Originally posted by Saberstylemasta
If Snape is still good, why did he use and unforgiveable curse on Harry, and why did he set Hagrids hut on fire?
He HAD to keep his cover.

OH yeah, and torture Harry. If he was still on the good side, there was no way in hell he would have used a Unforgivable Curse on Harry, no matter what his feelings.

Snape:
-kills dumbledore
-duels the crap out of harry and tries to torture him
-betrays the order
-nearly caused the death of Bill, a fellow Order member
-sets hagrid's hut on fire

And you still think he's on the good side?
*sad attempt to envision*

Snape:"Okay, I was working for Dumbledore the whole - "
Harry: "AAAAAAAAARRGGH I'LL F*CKING KILL YOU B***H!!!!"
Hagrid: "Tha' motherf*cking sunuvabitch!!!!!!! Git' 'im, Grawp!"
Grawp: (loud roar)
Snape:"WAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAA!!!!!" fear

*audible squish*

😆

Originally posted by DarkCanadian
OH yeah, and torture Harry. If he was still on the good side, there was no way in hell he would have used a Unforgivable Curse on Harry, no matter what his feelings.

Snape:
-kills dumbledore
-duels the crap out of harry and tries to torture him
-betrays the order
-nearly caused the death of Bill, a fellow Order member
-sets hagrid's hut on fire

And you still think he's on the good side?
*sad attempt to envision*

Snape:"Okay, I was working for Dumbledore the whole - "
Harry: "AAAAAAAAARRGGH I'LL F*CKING KILL YOU B***H!!!!"
Hagrid: "Tha' motherf*cking sunuvabitch!!!!!!! Git' 'im, Grawp!"
Grawp: (loud roar)
Snape:"WAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAA!!!!!" fear

*audible squish*

Bill wasn't his fault. Remember Snape had no clue that Draco was letting people in. And remember, though he will be working with Dumbledore, he hates Harry and probably used it on him because he hates him, and just wanted to get it out of his system. Two, he did keep Harry alive. They could have killed him right there and then, but he said for them to keep him alive.

Who would he return to the good side if everyone on the good side wants him to be fed to a compound of Blast-Ended Skrewts?

Originally posted by NightCrawler341
Bill wasn't his fault. Remember Snape had no clue that Draco was letting people in. And remember, though he will be working with Dumbledore, he hates Harry and probably used it on him because he hates him, and just wanted to get it out of his system. Two, he did keep Harry alive. They could have killed him right there and then, but he said for them to keep him alive.
he didn't kill harry because he said it was the dark lord's right to kill him or something like that i don't have the book on me right now so i can't quote it

Yea.... they are going to kill him before he could get it out to them that he is a good guy.

Originally posted by shadow12
he didn't kill harry because he said it was the dark lord's right to kill him or something like that i don't have the book on me right now so i can't quote it
So? If you haven't noticed, people tried to kill Harry for the dark lord, what makes this different?