Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince - Book 2005

he just got in over his head. he isn't really evil like his dad was. when it came down to it, he wasn't really willing to do what voldy wanted him to do

i know harry isnt a Horcrux but couldnt Harry kill Voldemort than kill himself???

i know dumbledore said to get the Horcruxes first, but he didnt say you had to.. unless i missing something

HArry isnt a Horcruz anyway

Threads Merged

harry has no reason to kill himself. what would it accomplish?

Okay I'm finally done with the book. My thoughts:

Disapointed, I really was. It seemed like she completly rushed the book! And Dumbledore dying .. .was it me or did that seem complety forced? it seemed like she forced a death. I was really disappointed with this book. Really.

maybe his death was a little forced. it was something that had to happen and hse pushed it through rightt at the last minute. didn't really draw it out or anything

I would have to dissagree, I felt Dumbledore's death coming way before it happened so I don't think it was rushed at all. And I agree that it was something that had to happen. I have my theories, I think that his death with be the final staw, the one that gets Harry mad enough to kill Voldemort in the last book.

^^ my theory's somewhat like that too ✅

true. that's what Harry says at the end

Spoiler:
Why, Why Dumbledore... And at the hands of snape!

We already have a thread for dscussion of this bookm titled Harry Potter and the half blood prince-2005

please stop making double threads.

and if we knew how it happened, seeing as you're TELLING us, why would we come?

Originally posted by TinkrBellBaBii
for those who have already read the book . . .
(PLEASE DON'T READ IF YOU HAVEN'T FINISHED THE BOOK!!)

ok i just finished the book today and i was wondering what you guys thought about this. It was just a kind of daydream I had about what might happen in the 7th book ...

Harry said at the end of HBP that he probably wasnt going to return to Hogwarts and that he was going to look for the other Horcruxes and once that is accomplished, kill Voldemort. Do any of you think its possible that Harry himself could be one of Voldemort's Horcruxes? Dumbledore did tell Harry that it was possible to have a living creature or a human as a Horcrux. This would also explain why the prophecy stated "neither can live while the other survives" as both Harry and Voldemort would have to die.

please give me your opinions, i'd like to hear what some of you guys think about it. thanks 🙂

😄 theres quite a debate on here about it actuall! :d Me and a few othedrs adamantly believe Harry IS a Horcrux, most others don't! Welcome to our small and select group! 😄

Originally posted by daeri
Harry isn't a horcrux.. because he has to kill him self first before he kills voldemort..

he could kill himself and Voldemort at the same time. Or someone could kill voldie after harry dies, cos then they'd only have to kill the squidgy tiny bit of soul left!

Originally posted by shadow12
no prob
he killed so many times that killing lily and james wouldn't matter for the horcrux he killed them be cause they got in the way

But dumblydor tells harry that Voldie was going to use James death for his last horcrux...

or something like that anyways. He definitely said that voldie didn't have his sixth horcrux when he went there

pg. 473 of uk edition

"However, if my calculations are correct, Voldemort was still at least one Horcrux short of his goal o six when he entered your parents house"

And I don't think Draco is 'evil', I personally think 'evil' is a very big word to throw around, I don't even think Voldie is pure evil. Draco is pressured into a task he can never really commit, and suffers a lot for it - for example, he is crys in the toilet with Myrtle - I think myrtle's the only one who really knows how he's feeling

good point.

Close?

Yeah, Draco isn't evil. not really. But Snape is a traitorous bad person. Evil sounds better Phoe...