The so called "Most Powerful Sith Lord Ever"

Started by Lightsnake22 pages

Originally posted by Deception
Yes but knowledge to a degree is power, and the techniques invented by the Ancients that were used substantially by later generations ala Revan, Kun and etc were probably hatched by the greatest of Ancients ala Tulak, Ragnos. Kun wouldn't be on par with these Sith.

However with the Ancients we have seen, such as Ludo and Sadow, then yes Kun is likely to be stronger than them.

Ye but with Luke, he similarly attained knowledge no other Jedi or Sith would've had, and it is likely he wouldn't have a clue about certain powers with the Ancients who disappeared even before Kun's time.


What prevents Kun from being on par with Tulak or Ragnos who haven't shown us much by way of anything? Kun's knowledge is limited sure, but his potential and power and showings?

Knowledge doesn't make up everything, and Luke's order has the Telos Holocron, which is THE Sith holocron for knowledge and power according to Jedi vs. Sith.

I really want a comic or mini-story about Tulak (like the one about Krul or Maul). I love the saber aces, and he's supposed to be just about the best.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
What prevents Kun from being on par with Tulak or Ragnos who haven't shown us much by way of anything? Kun's knowledge is limited sure, but his potential and power and showings?

Knowledge doesn't make up everything, and Luke's order has the Telos Holocron, which is THE Sith holocron for knowledge and power according to Jedi vs. Sith.

Yes but all of Kun's knowledge was learned from the ancients. And hell, he only really used Naga Sadow's knowledge. Ragnos, who was the greatest and most powerful of all the ancient sith more than likely knew not only what Kun knew, but a hell of a lot more than that.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
But in Rise of Darth Vader (or whatever comes directly after Ep. 3) Palpatine laments that he would never find another apprentice "concieved by the [b]will of the Force". Does this mean that Plageius didn't create him? Also, what if the question doesn't matter? Would it change anything? I'm playing Devil's Advocate, so I'll let the matter drop and cling to my pet theory. [/B]

Why can't it be both?

I mean, this question is similar to a conflict with Christianity vs. Science. The Big Bang Theory is plausible and scientifically viable, yes? But it doesn't debunk or disprove Christianity -- why couldn't the Big Bang be the method by which God created the universe? The answer: it could be, but most Chrisitians are idiots.

Originally posted by Camael
bahh what are you talking about count dooku killed everyone...
count dooku got killed by anakin sure he matched yoda but anakin got beaten by a tusken his own son and his own aprentice vader in power of other sith isnt that tough also the most powerfull sith was on sith vs jedi a girl who was called rain she broke necks blew up her brothers hand and resisted a thought bomb the most powerful sith ad jedi force power ever and sidious wasnt the only one to conquer the galaxy ever heard of krayt?

Originally posted by Zampanó
[quote]

Where did Palpatine say that? Sith Alchemy does involve alterations at the molecular level. imo sith alchemy is the closest known process to which leads me to believe that sith alchemy may have been used in some way in Anakin's creation whether he actually used it or took principle ideas from it.[/quote
What's the current consensus? Was Anakin created by Plageius or by the Force? For a while I was hearing quotes from GL about "only the force" but then my pet theory re-surfaced and I had hope again. Should we take a vote? Did Plageius create Anakin?

could be both but i geuss plageus did it darth zannah could create creatures as well (aka rain)it could be possible but darth zannah is definetly the most powerful

So, why to reply to a thread with more then 2 years?

And why reply to it when I honestly think you dont know what your talking about?

Naga Sadow almost had the star systems in his hand

Originally posted by Gideon
Why can't it be both?

I mean, this question is similar to a conflict with Christianity vs. Science. The Big Bang Theory is plausible and scientifically viable, yes? But it doesn't debunk or disprove Christianity -- why couldn't the Big Bang be the method by which God created the universe? The answer: it could be, but most Chrisitians are idiots.

Says the person who spends their live on this site all the time. I beileve apart from most chirstians thatgod made everything happen scientificaly
i know thats spelled wrong

Deep. thats, like,,, some pretty profound shit.

fuckin religion... how dose it even work???

Religion and Magnets: The ultimate unanswerable questions.

Originally posted by draylok3
count dooku got killed by anakin sure he matched yoda but anakin got beaten by a tusken his own son and his own aprentice vader in power of other sith isnt that tough also the most powerfull sith was on sith vs jedi a girl who was called rain she broke necks blew up her brothers hand and resisted a thought bomb the most powerful sith ad jedi force power ever and sidious wasnt the only one to conquer the galaxy ever heard of krayt?
he did not conquer. HE still has the true chosen one to deal with and all of the other jedi duh.