Originally posted by Evil Dead
not answered. I know why the religion is called Christianity.....although I'm surprised you do after admitting last year that you have never read the bible in your life. The question is how Christians do not recognize it as a sin. The religion is named after the diefied "son" of god....not god himself. This clearly breaks the first commandment, "thou shalt have no other gods before me". Being the church of christ as opposed to the church of god is the greatest sin, breaking the very first law given to man by god.again, not answered. You don't need to worship the cross for it to be a sin. Pagan's didn't worship idles......they made idles to represent the gods they worshiped......just as Christians use the cross to represent Jesus in all it's blasphemy. This is ofcourse breaking the second commandment. If you ever read the bible chibi boy you'll see this.
why are you back? didn't I run your 13 year old ass out of this forum last year via point by point dissection of your posts and lack of any knowledge pertaining to religion, christianity specificly, physics, just about anything in general contained therein?
1. Lol, i never said i had never read it, i just accepted that i didn't read it well, also including my bad memory = well....
And what's so wrong with worshipping god himself? Jesus christ is part of god but as his son, and it doesn't disobey the commandment firstly because he's god anyway, and secondly because we don't actually know what gods name is. We are technically naming it after god, as we don't know gods original name we must stay with the title he had on earth, the title WE gave him. Just cause it's named after him/his son, doesn't mean we aren't worshipping him.
2. Jesus is part of god, and the only part of god of whom we actually know was ever human, and since we don't know what the other parts of god look like... The cross is for us to remember the pain he went through for us, and how he did it so willingly, with gods son (or god). Just cause our symbol includes gods son/god, doesn't mean we aren't worshipping him.
And you didn't "run my 13 year old ass" lol You do realise that we aren't in the realm of science anymore, so technically...
Originally posted by Alliance
DUH!No. And you cant make two posts without contradicting yourself.
I know i'm contradicting myself, it's true, i'm just denying the silly part of what i said before 🙂
Originally posted by Evil Dead
no sir. Jesus = flesh and blood man, born of this earth some 2000 years ago........supposed sun of god, result of some heeby-jeeby union between god and a mortal woman......a half-breed........hercules.
Urm, god = spirit, spirit = inside of Jesus 😖
Originally posted by Evil Dead
impossible. The bible states god existed before man......therefore Jesus (the human form of god as you put it) could not have existed at the same time as the other. This means that Jesus had to be created after man........which means god had to be created (atleast part, Jesus).Jesus, as told of in the NT, was born 2000 years ago. This leaves only two conclusions. Jesus was god, which means god was born 2000 years ago........after humans so the entire old testament is a work of fiction or that Jesus was indeed not god and therefore the very name and symbol of Christianity are blaspehmous.
God could have existed at the same time as the other, cause god is a supreme being! He can do what he likes! You seem to believe a useless peice of nothing(the universe) can do amazing things liek make itself but u can't believe a supreme being(god) can do much atall! 😖
You seem to be missing large parts of... well... everything 😖