Not weaker PHYSICALLY. Anybody's who read more than 1 avengers comic knows that Thor needs Mjolnir to fly. This is basic, it doesn't bring any more to the discussion. Rage's point is that the hammer doesn't give Thor any kind of physical boost.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Maybe that's what the guy is trying to say. From what I read, he is saying Thor is weaker without the Hammer which is why he was "losing" his fights. Just maybe.
And if he hadn't quoted Rage's discussion about how Thor is not physically boosted by Mjolnir, when making his stupid condescending post, I would have let him slide.
Originally posted by Kris BlazeAre you that stupid??? If i pitch a baseball to your 5 year old azz and you hit it with your fist or arm, how far will it go???? Now pick up a bat and hit it... Do you get it now????? The hammer amps the damage done by the strength behind it dummy.... just like the bat increases the distance the ball may travel when hit using strength...damn!!!..... If two boxers fight in a match and the weaker fighter is given a hammer... guess what that hammer does when the weaker fighter connects with a hammer amped uppercut?????
Not weaker PHYSICALLY. Anybody's who read more than 1 avengers comic knows that Thor needs Mjolnir to fly. This is basic, it doesn't bring any more to the discussion. Rage's point is that the hammer doesn't give Thor any kind of physical boost.You're missing a lot of things here.
- It was not settled, seeing as Hulk fled and Thor was ready to go on fighting. One part runs and the other wants to continue fighting, that's hardly a victory for the part that flees. This is obvious to anybody.
- Because it's there! There's no logical reason why Thor would let Mjolnir lie.
- How can Thor be in the air for 60 seconds? Why didn't Mjolnir return to his hand? Once again, Gladiator from the future, Thor beat him up in the end, Gladiator admitted that he had failed. AND IT WAS NOT THIS GLADIATOR. So how is this relevant?
- So how does that have any bearing on Thor WITHOUT his hammer? He was knocked out with it.
- Yes? And?
- What the hell are you talking about son? When did I claim that Thor one-shotted anybody? Are you deluded? You're making shit up. I know you're like 12, but still, try to keep up here. Rage claimed that the hammer did not give Thor any kind of physical boost, which IT CLEARLY DOESN'T. Your stupid ass responded by saying that Thor got knocked out by a couple of guys when he had his hammer, and that he used his hammer to beat some of them?
What the fuuuuuuuck does this have to do with anything? Thor won by shrinking Hyperion. He won by using not only physical force, but lightning against Gladiator. He won by throwing his hammer at Wonderman. So how the shit is any of this testament to the hammer amping up Thor physically? IT IS NOT!
Originally posted by james2099
Are you that stupid??? If i pitch a baseball to your 5 year old azz and you hit it with your fist or arm, how far will it go???? Now pick up a bat and hit it... Do you get it now????? The hammer amps the damage done by the strength behind it dummy.... just like the bat increases the distance the ball may travel when hit using strength...damn!!!
If you're trying to make a point that's already widely known, I suggest not quoting posts where they're DISCUSSING SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Because when you're being master of the obvious like that, you're going to get your ass handed to you. All because of a misunderstanding.
Originally posted by Kris BlazeMy ass handed to me on a computer about comicbook characters????.. Dont think so.
If you're trying to make a point that's already widely known, I suggest not quoting posts where they're DISCUSSING SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Because when you're being master of the obvious like that, you're going to get your ass handed to you. All because of a misunderstanding.
Originally posted by Kris BlazeUnderstand this... It is known that thors stats does not change with or without his hammer when it comes to strength. But it does change without his hammer when it comes to power and damage output or who he can stand up to.. he can fight hulk (for awhile) juggernaut, wonderman..etc.. Not gladiator,superman or even hyperion because he will need the hammer because they are far more than bricks.
And if he hadn't quoted Rage's discussion about how Thor is not physically boosted by Mjolnir, when making his stupid condescending post, I would have let him slide.
Originally posted by james2099
Understand this... It is known that thors stats does not change with or without his hammer when it comes to strength. But it does change without his hammer when it comes to power and damage output or who he can stand up to.. he can fight hulk (for awhile) juggernaut, wonderman..etc.. Not gladiator,superman or even hyperion because he will need the hammer because they are far more than bricks.
Cool, master of the obvious strikes again.
Originally posted by h1a8
Either I must be delusional or you are lying through your teeth (I mean keyboard). And the former is highly unlikely.
I'm lying? Are you freaking serious? Exactly what am I lying about?
That Thor is not physically weaker without Mjolnir than he is with Mjolnir? That he had his 60 second enchantment, for most of his career even up to Volume 2?
What utter shit.
You are delusional. It is not unlikely at all.
Ask anyone who has actually read Thor to confirm my statements if it will appease your damaged psyche.