Fantastic Four vs X-Men

Started by wolvie'sgirl33 pages

X-men...... that's a no-brainer!

Originally posted by stormfront13
no, I didn't claim storm would beat wonder woman. I said that ww would win, but that storm wasn't as weak as everybody was saying. there's a difference between the two.

I saw you claim that Storm would beat Wonder Woman because she did so in the crossover. Don't lie. Either way, you claimed she'd beat Dr. Doom, that's just pathetic. Moreover, in that same thread you admitted to knowing next to nothing about the Fantastic Four.

Originally posted by stormfront13
and storm has beaten torch, yet everybody is saying that it doesn't count and that johnny would beat her. the f4 aren't in another leage than the x-men. a certain team of x-men could easily beat the f4. jean alone could do it, as well as iceman. jean, iceman, storm, and polaris could easily take the f4. even nightcrawler alone gives them trouble with his ability to teleport off a persons body part.

First, Storm beat Jonny in the series that Rogue beat The Hulk. Contest of Champions, written by? Shock horror, Mr. I love the X-Men, Chris Claremont.

Ice-Man alone couldn't take the F4 and the only reason he's as powerful as he is has to do with writers being lazy and not wanting to work at making the characters good. So they just give them crazy powers out of nowhere and fanboys like you suck it up. Jean alone couldn't take the F4, she's weak physically, extremely. Polaris? Hahaha. Funny. She can barely take Jean. X-Men are upgraded stupidly over many years, had about 50 member changes to keep the cash flowing. The F4 have more or less always been the F4 and always been the best at what they do. Combining loads of "powerful" X-Men won't win this fight, because the Fantastic Four as a team over come much greater odds.

Either way THAT^^^ is all irrelevant, despite it being true. YOU loving the X-Men and believing that they are on level or better than the F4 doesn't mean they are. It just means you feltch the X-Men. Anyone with half a sense of comic history knows what I'm saying is true.

So give it a rest.

-AC

what the hell? alpha centauri's back on the versus forum?

you've been replaced by a snarky fellow named whirly, AC.

A) I can't be replaced.

B) I'm not back, just inhabiting this thread.

C) Whirly is a good egg, he was nice to that kid.

-AC

Ignoring stormfront's blatant bias - AC all you've really proven is that you think the FF win "because they're the definitive Marvel team." This particular team of X-Men - although Wolverine is redundant - can and imo more often than not would beat the FF in this thread. Thus far I haven't heard any particular reason - other than gadgets, which in a no prep fight are dubious - why the FF are immune to Emma Frost's telepathy.

Don't bother lol.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Ignoring stormfront's blatant bias - AC all you've really proven is that you think the FF win "because they're the definitive Marvel team." This particular team of X-Men - although Wolverine is redundant - can and imo more often than not would beat the FF in this thread. Thus far I haven't heard any particular reason - other than gadgets, which in a no prep fight are dubious - why the FF are immune to Emma Frost's telepathy.

Not sure why telepathy is the be all and end all of fights on this forum.

Unless Emma Frost can within a split second COMPLETELY neutralise all four members, she's going to get either a) something thrown at her head; b) force bubble in the face; c) suffocated; d) barbecued.

It's Emma Frost, not Onslaught.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Not sure why telepathy is the be all and end all of fights on this forum.

Unless Emma Frost can within a split second COMPLETELY neutralise all four members, she's going to get either a) something thrown at her head; b) force bubble in the face; c) suffocated; d) barbecued.

It's Emma Frost, not Onslaught.

She's done it before to the X-Men.

Originally posted by Creshosk
She's done it before to the X-Men.

She isn't fighting the X-Men.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
She isn't fighting the X-Men.
You're right, the X-Men have more psionic resistance being, you know, more used to it.

Originally posted by Creshosk
You're right, the X-Men have more psionic resistance being, you know, more used to it.

Syllogism. That's not actually provable is it?

Just sounds likely.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Syllogism. That's not actually provable is it?

Just sounds likely.

Because the FF do indeed have psionic resistance right?

wow i never realised people hate claremont so bad

damn

who are we again?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Because the FF do indeed have psionic resistance right?

Everyone resists it to an extent. Will depend how much in the specific battle.

wow i never realised so many people mock claremont

damn

who are we again?

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Everyone resists it to an extent. Will depend how much in the specific battle.
Not by default they don't.

It's like saying that everyone is resistant to a direct blast of sun hot fire to an extent.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Not by default they don't.

It's like saying that everyone is resistant to a direct blast of fire to an extent.

It is, and they are, until the burning starts. Telepathy isn't a fixed force.

To use your analogy, like the difference between a man and a baby getting in a hot bath.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It is, and they are, until the burning starts. Telepathy isn't a fixed force.

To use your analogy, like the difference between a man and a baby getting in a hot bath.

Why did you remove the "sun hot" part?

A person can survive a direct blast of fire that's as hot as the sun?

So much for Torch's nova blasts then. I mean you're fighting grown mutants, and wolverine is over 100. So since as you implied skin gets more heat reistant with age. . . Wolverine must be immune to the torch.

Great logic there. . .

Originally posted by Creshosk
Why did you remove the "sun hot" part?

I didn't, you edited it in after I replied.

Originally posted by Creshosk

A person can survive a direct blast of fire that's as hot as the sun?

No, because you put that in after you saw your faulty logic.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I didn't, you edited it in after I replied.
You replied two minutes later. . there would have been an edited by with a timestamp at the bottom after that long.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
No, because you put that in after you saw your faulty logic.
Put what in? It was in there originally.

Interesting red herring you have going on here though.