Originally posted by PVS
*sigh* the cop clearly ordered the kid to stand up or he would get tased. that renders the 'why's' irrelevant. 2 times you can clearly see that the kid was assaulting nobody and got hit simply for not getting up.anyway it doesnt matter. he was on the ground and if the cops deemed him a threat they would(should) have proceeded to cuff him. now, if he had resisted and THEN got tased that would be another issue entirely (although imho too excessive none the less)
its spelled out clearly in what the cop said. you can choose to ignore it if you wish, or dwell on the irelevant, but the fact stands: cops threatened to use the taser is the kid didnt obey an order to stand up (very odd and inappropriate in an apprehension), the kid refused, and they hit him like 6 times
And without any background whatsoever, you can't tell ANYTHING from what happened. Seriously, I'm not some police nut who loves to see people get tasered, and I'm not waiting for the government to take over the world. I'm just not going to pass judgement on it until I know what actually happened.
And there seems to be some confusion here. A police officer does not have to believe his life is in danger in order to use a taser. If the kid was getting in the cops face, spitting, yelling, or being absolutely uncooperative to begin with, then they are absolutely and totally justified in using the taser. They simply ARE. But I don't know if he was. And you don't know if he wasn't. You can't tell anything from this video. You can't argue that what they did was justified or not justified, simple as that.