I like your style on the ol' 'no, you are' routine. It suits you.
Hedonism begins at home, AC.
This is a little off-topic, but are you dealing with problems related to insecurity? I notice that after every post you add the superfluous 'AC'. Do you think we won't know it's you posting even with your name right there next to every post?
Poor boy! Mommy's calling...
-YKF
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
It certainly is a peculiar mind that believes he has found a follower in someone who has castigated him for his crapola. However, considering that you are the character in question, it actually kind of yeah-you-know, makes sense.
witty comeback, but you started this flame war with AC when you used the wrong word to describe an action and singled his post out for personal attention. It certainly appears you came on to attack him and the fact your initially attack line was flawed in its communication has led to a rather pathetic flame war. Neither of you will back own that much is clear so i will sit back with some popcorn.
At the moment I give slightly in favour of AC as he usually wins these things and you did not know the meaning of illude. In your favour you are sharp and have a nasty line in personal abuse.
🙂
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
It certainly is a peculiar mind that believes he has found a follower in someone who has castigated him for his crapola. However, considering that you are the character in question, it actually kind of yeah-you-know, makes sense.
Let's stop pretending I haven't owned you wherever you've followed me though 🙂.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Let's stop pretending I haven't owned you wherever you've followed me though.
My work here is done. I've managed to teach both you and your pal a new word. The only shame is that you don't know how to use it.
I enjoy playing with this idea that you 'owned' me:
- Yes, mummy...I know it's not nice to laugh at people less fortunate than I, but he's just so funny! Look, he still thinks he's 'won'! What was the competition again? "Oh, how I do like to live beside the low-life..."
- STOP IT! RIGHT NOW!
- Sorry, mummy. I couldn't help it.
- Apologise to the poor boy!
- Sorry, AC. I won't make fun of you again.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
My work here is done. I've managed to teach both you and your pal a new word. The only shame is that you don't know how to use it.I enjoy playing with this idea that you 'owned' me:
- Yes, mummy...I know it's not nice to laugh at people less fortunate than I, but he's just so funny! Look, he still thinks he's 'won'! What was the competition again? "Oh, how I do like to live beside the low-life..."
- STOP IT! RIGHT NOW!
- Sorry, mummy. I couldn't help it.
- Apologise to the poor boy!
- Sorry, AC. I won't make fun of you again.
Hahaha, it's actually getting to the point that I feel like your role model. You're an idiot man, you've proven it. I didn't even have to do most of the work. Moreover, you'll likely be banned if you continue. I won't, because you're following me. Though you are entertaining.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Alot of paedophilia gets blown way out of proportion as many have said, for no other reason other than kids are involved.Proof being in a paper yesterday there was a headline: "Arsonists kill 4 year old baby" or something.
I was reading it, then I noticed that the mother was tied up and left to burn alive. Yet they chose to highlight the fact that a baby died. It's child worship. You either love everyone from all ages equally or you can shut up.
Crimes are crimes, some cases are more severe than others but age should never be that decider.
-AC
You didn't read it though did you? I told you about it.
The Brass Eye Special is excellent.
It was perfectly pitched to infuriate the very people it was attempting to 'help' (ie those that are inflamed by a provocative media).
It's the issue that's surrounded by the most BS and hypocrisy.
Any attempt to sensibly debate is met with fury- and the media seems intent on poking such people with a stick.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
The Brass Eye Special is excellent.It was perfectly pitched to infuriate the very people it was attempting to 'help' (ie those that are inflamed by a provocative media).
It's the issue that's surrounded by the most BS and hypocrisy.
Any attempt to sensibly debate is met with fury- and the media seems intent on poking such people with a stick.
I actually saw that. I couldn't (and still can't) believe how stupid people could be, and how blindly people will follow something without even knowing or bothering to find out what's really going on.
back to the topic.........
I believe any teacher who openly admits to being a pedophile can be rightfully terminated. A teacher must not only teach, they must also be responsible for the well being and safety of the children while in their care. If the community (mostly the parents of the students) do not feel comfortable trusting that the teacher will look out for the well being and safety of their children, the teacher should not retain the position. Going to school is not an option......it is a mandate. It is illegal not to. The salary of the teacher comes directly from the taxpayers.....the parents of the students. I don't believe anywhere it the constitution is mentions a government right to legally force children to be cared for by a person who the majority feel to be compramising to the position.......at the parents cost none the less.
Originally posted by Evil Dead
back to the topic.........I believe any teacher who openly admits to being a pedophile can be rightfully terminated. A teacher must not only teach, they must also be responsible for the well being and safety of the children while in their care. If the community (mostly the parents of the students) do not feel comfortable trusting that the teacher will look out for the well being and safety of their children, the teacher should not retain the position. Going to school is not an option......it is a mandate. It is illegal not to. The salary of the teacher comes directly from the taxpayers.....the parents of the students. I don't believe anywhere it the constitution is mentions a government right to legally force children to be cared for by a person who the majority feel to be compramising to the position.......at the parents cost none the less.
Thoughts are not a crime and this is the point.
the thread does not simply ask about crime.........it was also mentioned should someone be fired?
a person does not have to be guilty of a crime to lose their job. If the person signing their paycheck is in anyway doubtful that the person can perform their task, termination is completely acceptable. Probably 99% of the people who have ever been fired from a job.......any job.....did not commit a crime......
Originally posted by Evil Dead
the thread does not simply ask about crime.........it was also mentioned should someone be fired?a person does not have to be guilty of a crime to lose their job. If the person signing their paycheck is in anyway doubtful that the person can perform their task, termination is completely acceptable. Probably 99% of the people who have ever been fired from a job.......any job.....did not commit a crime......
Your talking about professional responsibility, acting as not to bring an organisation into disreput. I think in a school articulating his feelings would certainly cause problems, if his commments had been taken out of context or had been made up obvioulsy no action would be taken. If he had said something to someone or this is alleged it could be hearsay. If he had said something like she's pretty etc again no action. If it had been stronger, he would almost certainly be asked to explain himself in the UK before the board of Governors. It is unlikely he would be sacked more likely he woluld recieve an official warning. Trust me I have been a school Governor 🙂
The US I cannot talk about 🙂