pre-crisis superman Vs the hulk (When he could lift that 150,000,000,000 ton mountian

Started by Reflassshh7 pages

Originally posted by carver9
In your opinion, what would be 'proof' to you?
Doesn't matter since you're the one making statements.

If you have any 'proof' backing your stance then show it bro.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
Doesn't matter since you're the one making statements.

If you have any 'proof' backing your stance then show it bro.

What's average showings to you because our definition might be different.

Originally posted by carver9
What's average showings to you because our definition might be different.
For example if out of 100 showings, 60 show a character unable to lift something heavier than a mountain, that's his/her average.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
For example if out of 100 showings, 60 show a character unable to lift something heavier than a mountain, that's his/her average.

Doesn't make sense since a lot of these characters rarely loft anything like that. On 'average' none of them can lift something like that. I've seen them struggle on multiple of occasions with far less.

Originally posted by carver9
Doesn't make sense since a lot of these characters rarely loft anything like that. On 'average' none of them can lift something like that. I've seen them struggle on multiple of occasions with far less.
Which bring us to the first question, you have proof of this or not?

Originally posted by Reflassshh
Which bring us to the first question, you have proof of this or not?

Plenty. So if I show you them failing or straining to lift something of lesser weight, that's proof enough?

Originally posted by carver9
Plenty. So if I show you them failing or straining to lift something of lesser weight, that's proof enough?
If those showings constitute the majority of their feats of course.

Originally posted by Cameron Scott
Pre-Crisis Superman used to tow planets from one galaxy and move them to the other, can the Hulk do that? no.

Hell PC Supes was basically on the league or higher than Silver Age Mangog, you can't compete against that.

superman will win this

Originally posted by Reflassshh
If those showings constitute the majority of their feats of course.

That's the thing, the majority of their fts doesn't show them lifting anything the size of that mountain though. You would have to lean more on their high end to make a case on them lifting a mountain that size, especially with ease.

Originally posted by carver9
That's the thing, the majority of their fts doesn't show them lifting anything the size of that mountain though. You would have to lean more on their high end to make a case on them lifting a mountain that size, especially with ease.
It's not that hard then, show me the majority of their lifting feats being under mountain lvl and be done bro.

If you want to take it back is ok.

Originally posted by Reflassshh
It's not that hard then, show me the majority of their lifting feats being under mountain lvl and be done bro.

If you want to take it back is ok.

Nothing to take back, I stand by what I am saying. You can believe what you want as well. I'm not going to post scans of them struggling or failing to lift less than a mountain that was TWICE the size of the Appalachians because even if I did, you'll deem it as low showings and use high showings to counter it, not understanding what average means. If you think their walk around strength is that of a mountain that made the earth shake when falling, then oh well. I don't think that.

Considering that was Banner Hulk who had difficulty getting stronger and was about even with Thor in strength as shown in Hulk 278, I don't see how "nobody can do it." But again its carver, so if it was Bruce Banner lifting it he would say nobody can do it save Bruce Banner.

I don't know why anybody takes him seriously at this point.

Originally posted by carver9
Nothing to take back, I stand by what I am saying. You can believe what you want as well. I'm not going to post scans of them struggling or failing to lift less than a mountain that was TWICE the size of the Appalachians because even if I did, you'll deem it as low showings and use high showings to counter it, not understanding what average means. If you think their walk around strength is that of a mountain that made the earth shake when falling, then oh well. I don't think that.
You're basically saying after all this years on the forum you don't understand what average means? 😕

Agree to disagree then. I'd have liked to see your proof though

Originally posted by Reflassshh
You're basically saying after all this years on the forum you don't understand what average means? 😕

Agree to disagree then. I'd have liked to see your proof though

Lol...not me buddy.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol...not me buddy.

Ok well Carver agrees PC superman wins. Thats all we needed to know.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol...not me buddy.
You're implying i don't?

Originally posted by Reflassshh
You're implying i don't?

What I'm saying is i understand the difference between average walk around strength and high end.

Also, Time, I agree, PC Superman stomps this. That's the weakest version of Hulk.

Originally posted by carver9
What I'm saying is i understand the difference between average walk around strength and high end.

Also, Time, I agree, PC Superman stomps this. That's the weakest version of Hulk.

And against the strongest version, WB?

Of course PC Superman stomps ANY version of Hulk or even all of them together but I'm sure Carver thinks differently. LOL. Also, I thought Professor Hulk was the weakest. Not the one from 'Secret Wars'.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
And against the strongest version, WB?

Off topic. Superman stomps this version of Hulk.