christianity is not a forced religion Christ said that if you did not be3lieve in him he would not force himself apon you. hopwever if you do not believe in him or in God you will have to face the consa quenses when you are judged by god at the end of your life and he said we would be judged wether we believed in him or not
Originally posted by gp christ loves
christianity is not a forced religion Christ said that if you did not be3lieve in him he would not force himself apon you. hopwever if you do not believe in him or in God you will have to face the consa quenses when you are judged by god at the end of your life and he said we would be judged wether we believed in him or not
Which was why for centuries the Catholic Church terrorized people into joining and following them. Which is why the governments of many countries would require people to follow a certain religion and excommunicate them if they didn't. Yeah, that's not forced.
And there are no consequences for thinking for yourself.
none of the gospels contradict each other and you have four so that they help proof each other of there validity.
actually i have studied this one only about 5 of the major characters in the bible arent found in any other historical records. historians have found other records for all the kings mintioned all but 10 of the named people in the new testament and all but 20 in the old testament
the governments forced people to be part of certain religious groups not to belive in christ it is ones own choice wether or not they belive in that
and if there truly weren't consaquences for our thought we wouldn't ever feel guilty for the things that we sometimes think about. also if it was fully prooven that Christ was the savior and that there was a God then there would be no more need for faith
do all of you have to have signs for you to belive something. i mean some things just have to be taken by faith.
none of the gospels contradict each other and you have four so that they help proof each other of there validity.ok who did the women see at the tomb
what were the names of the apostles? was it acoring to Matthew and Mark or was it according to John and Luke
actually i have studied this one only about 5 of the major characters in the bible arent found in any other historical records. historians have found other records for all the kings mintioned all but 10 of the named people in the new testament and all but 20 in the old testamentname these historical records that shows those characters
the governments forced people to be part of certain religious groups not to belive in christ it is ones own choice wether or not they belive in thatobviously dont know how my country was christened then
think about this through out most of the bible Christ was hated for someone that was hated so much how come so many people follow him and belive in him today. now answer that one why dont youbecause these stories of Jesus gives people hope, ...................but even Hitler manage to give people hope in his writings and speeches and see where that led the world
Originally posted by finti
ok who did the women see at the tomb
was it a angel (Matthew)
was it two men (Luke)what were the names of the apostles? was it acoring to Matthew and Mark or was it according to John and Luke
name these historical records that shows those characters
obviously dont know how my country was christened then
because these stories of Jesus gives people hope, ...................but even Hitler manage to give people hope in his writings and speeches and see where that led the world
they saw an angel and then saw the rissen christ
an angel is one of gods first creations higher then man but not as high as christ they were messengers
what part of look are you asking about
the title apostle is given to those who were with Christ and actually saw him while he was alive just because someone is refered to as an apostle in one of the bools but not in another does not mean that they were not apostles
many srools that have been found in and around the were christ and his followers traveled show records of these people. the records in the catholic church and the records in the jewish temple show the same religious rulers as haveing lived at the same time the records of the kings throughout histoy are the same as the kings in the bible. the list goes on and on
christ gave hope to the down troden and the opressed Hitler did not give hope to the Jews wich he opressed its compareing apples to oranges.
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
I see...Wow, I never actually knew this.
Ok, then I believe in Jesus. I think Jesus was awesome. Not Christ however.
It would be funny if his last name was Christ, and this was all a cas eof mistaken identity. Kind like the Life of Brian, by Monty Python. LOL That would mean that Marys name was Mrs. Mary Christ, wife of old Joe Christ.
they saw an angel and then saw the rissen christwhy do Luke refer to two men then? or didnt this first hand dude get the facts right.........oh yes that story couldnt be first hand could it
the kings throughout histoy are the same as the kings in the bible. the list goes on and onyes the two Herods, now those were in fact historical figures this doesnt prove, even the Norwegian King saga have the historical figures right it is the event that aint all that objective.
christ gave hope to the down troden and the opressed Hitler did not give hope to the Jews wich he opressed its compareing apples to oranges.Hitler gave hope to a beaten and hungry German people
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
It would be funny if his last name was Christ, and this was all a cas eof mistaken identity. Kind like the Life of Brian, by Monty Python. LOL That would mean that Marys name was Mrs. Mary Christ, wife of old Joe Christ.
😂
I didn't actually think his surname was Christ 😮 since noone had a surname then, but...i just thought that was his full name for some reason.
O dear, how embarrassing.