The Official KMC "Conspiracy" Thread

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Many conspiracey theorists and followers included.

Agreed, don't think I'm singling out the generally population.All these stupid labels conformist non-conformist is stupid in my opnion they are social constructs. It's the reason I dislike society.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
I FRICKEN DID, heck I quoted the page now show me some pictures of the debris of the tail and wings, heck show me one remnant and I'll be convinced and what happened to the black box.

How can I share something I don't have, I don't have the answer, never claimed I did. I just don't think it was hit by flight 77.

Originally posted by Deano

if it was a plane it would of looked like this

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Based on what knowledge? Perhaps if the plane hit the pentagon as if the building were on a runway that little flash display might mean something. Deano, you have said soooooo many stupid things in this thread anything else that you say should be ignored.

denial..

XYZ I read the evidence, it only gives a shallow explaination and doesn't answer my question.

1) Where are the wing debris?

2) What happened to the Black Box?

Originally posted by lord xyz

🤨 apparently, plane engines can glide along the ground,.

When they are crashing obviously yeah, unless you think the Terrorist put the landing gear on?

on those links I posted, you see photographic evidence that the plane hit the pentagon.

Originally posted by lord xyz
on those links I posted, you see photographic evidence that the plane hit the pentagon.

Stop avoiding my question, where is the wing and tail debris or any pictures of the wing and tail debris ?

Hm..
Does this really suppose to be a conspiracy because the pentagon was hit by terrorists, there's nothing really the goverment covered-up. 😬

Originally posted by lord xyz
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_renovations.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html

Originally posted by lord xyz
okay

Forget the wings, tail and black box for now (even though there is evidence for all three), there's too much evidence for the plane. If the wings, tail and black box are the only opposing arguments, I'm not impressed.

Originally posted by lord xyz
see these?

Forget the wings and black box for now (even though there is evidence for both), there's too much evidence for the plane. If the wings and black box are the only opposing arguments, I'm not impressed.

I looked at all those links of evidence already, forget the wings? last I checked planes need wings to fly. If a boeing 757 crashed into the pentagon there would be a huge imprint on the pentagon (Because of the wings and tail) not to mention the video doesn't even show a plane just some streak.

and debaters need evidence to support their claim.
and debaters need to reply to all or atleast most of what the other person has said.
and debaters need to sound like they're not making everything up.

do they not?

Originally posted by lord xyz
and debaters need evidence to support their claim.
and debaters need to reply to all or atleast most of what the other person has said.
and debaters need to sound like they're not making everything up.

do they not?

What are you talking about, I'm DEBATING YOUR EVIDENCE That's obvious. It isn't enough to prove a plane hit it.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
I looked at all those links of evidence already, forget the wings? last I checked planes need wings to fly. If a boeing 757 crashed into the pentagon there would be a huge imprint on the pentagon (Because of the wings and tail) not to mention the video doesn't even show a plane just some streak.

And did you even read my post?

I say the last link tells the truth, But why would the goverment cover up something like that?
It doesn't make sense..

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
What are you talking about, [B]I'm DEBATING YOUR EVIDENCE That's obvious. It isn't enough to prove a plane hit it. [/B]

Originally posted by lord xyz
ermm, you do know when something explodes, it explodes [b]UP right? [/B]

😆 It "EXPLODES UP" WTH?

Originally posted by lord xyz
Meaning, the pictures straight after the strike, would be unreliable when it comes to the lawn. Now all the posts, shortly after the explosion and fire and the falling of the wreckage, ALL show bits of a Boeing 757.

How would they be unreliable, pictures that show an explosion are the most crucial, None of your pics show pieces of the wings or tail there huge so they should have at least one piece. You wouldn't even know the pieces of a boeing if you saw one...so yeah

Originally posted by lord xyz
so the photos don't prove anything?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html
look at the photos on this page why don't you.

A piece of scrap metal and eye witness accounts and your convinced?

Originally posted by Prelude Pianist
I say the last link tells the truth, But why would the goverment cover up something like that?
It doesn't make sense..

Originally posted by lord xyz
yes, the cover-up I do not know, maybe they invented the missle theory to mis-direct people in having a debate about what hit the pentagon. But another question is, "Why did Flight 77 disapear from air traffic controls with just enough time to turn around exactly like the investigators said, to hit the pentagon?" The plane rout evidence fits perfectly to say a F77 hit the pentagon.

I have a better question, Where's the black box?

so Blue, things don't explode upwards, and then the bits fall? That's not true is it? I bet even Deano can say you're wrong there. 🙄

Originally posted by lord xyz
so Blue, things don't explode upwards, and then the bits fall? That's not true is it? I bet even Deano can say you're wrong there. 🙄

Exactly when things blow up they become pieces, so where are the pieces of the wing?