ROTJ Luke Skywalker vs. TPM Obi-Wan Kenobi

Started by SpiritOfTheDead6 pages

Obi-Wan was blocking swift blows from Maul. Luke's blows were all hard, slow, and clumsy. Obi-Wan could just swiftly jump out of the way and slice Luke in half before Luke can recover his balance, since it takes Luke so long to recover from his wide-spanned and full-lengthed swings.

i figured someone would say that and all i can say is i disagree, oh well

suit yourself...

im definatley going with luke he may have not had as much training but hes just overall better..... i think luke would win but im voting for obiwan...... mark hamill sucks

WTF... Make up your mind.

And use better logic next them, because if thats the logic you are going to use you might as well just leave right now. Think before you vote and make an argument especially for the underdog.

You don't like the actor, ergo despite your opinion that Luke is better, you voted for Obi-Wan? WTF?!

Mhuahaha! Everybody wants to believe so badly that Obi Wan is an uber warrior, if Obi is so much better than Luke then padawan Obi can defeat darth vader too! Wich leads me to think that everybody is deluded!
Wow.. I will go against everybody! But hey, it's just the internet.

Originally posted by overlord
Mhuahaha! Everybody wants to believe so badly that Obi Wan is an uber warrior, if Obi is so much better than Luke then padawan Obi can defeat darth vader too! Wich leads me to think that everybody is deluded!
Wow.. I will go against everybody! But hey, it's just the internet.

If Padawan Obi was Anakin his son then yes he could have and would have... Vader was in not able willing or allowed to fight his son to the fullest. And he sure as hell didn't.

Maybe that's right.. Though I don't know if it's true.. The first movies were done very differently anyway, in the prequel they really began to make up fighting styles! So maybe the excuse that Vader didn't fight at his fullest is just to cover errors in the stories like Leia's force connection to her mother!
Anyway, I believe that in the original concept Luke became a real jedi knight.

I think it's pretty far fetched too that Vader was able to lose if he wasn't fighting at his fullest. C'mon, just because your holding back doesn't mean you suddenly can get defeated. Why would you let it get so far that you would actually lose when your holding back most of the fight, that's just stupid.

Originally posted by overlord
I think it's pretty far fetched too that Vader was able to lose if he wasn't fighting at his fullest. C'mon, just because your holding back doesn't mean you suddenly can get defeated. Why would you let it get so far that you would actually lose when your holding back most of the fight, that's just stupid.

Vader in ANH had tremendous physical strength. In ROTJ he got beat back by a mere Padawan swinging with a lightsaber. A lightsaber that he could have easily blocked or if he wanted too he could have easily stabbed Luke. He didn't.

But for some reason he did fall down, he tripped.. And Luke cut of his hand, then Luke threw away his lightsaber and as soon as he said that the Emperor had failed Vader got back up. Is it just me or does seem strange? It just doesn't make sense. It seems obvious to me that Vader was either told to lose and did, or was just clearly losing his mind in that fight and didn't know what to do anymore. To confused.

I would expect Vader heavily concentrated on defending when holding himself back still he managed to make some stupid mistake.. It's a little bit weird, but then again there are a lot of people who think episode 6 was stupid.

I just think that Luke was supposed to be pretty good from the original intention of Lucas' story. But I rather not discuss it because it's just too much of an opinion to me.

ok let me rephrase
ANH obi-wan could not beat vader and ANH obi-wan is more poweful than TPM obi-wan and if he could not beat vader and luke could that would mean luke is more powerful than ANH obi-wan like i said before is more powerful than TPM obi-wan... but obi-wan may have "let go" but would have eventually lost anyway....
besides in 1999 there was better technology than in the 80s so those swift moves done by obi-wan you would also see done by luke...

and on top of luke being powerful he used the darkside in ROTJ and we all know the darkside makes you stronger

The Dark Side is not stronger then the light side, did you not listen to Yoda. Besides Obi Wan used his anger in TPM too...

Not to much that Luke would have no reason to be angry in this fight.

On all that other crap you posted, those are all assumptions.

not much luke had to be angry about?

It does make some sense.. Luke and Vader were incredibly force sensative, maybe their anger takes them to a far greater level of power, well just speculation here but I thought I'd throw something in again.

No evidence for that at all. Especially not when you look at Luke.

Yeah, right.. Muhahahaha!!

They are great with the force. Sorry.