Wife Pours Boiling Oil All Over Her Husband.

The fact is that a crime has been committed agaisn't the husband. Whether it was an abusive relationship or spousal abuse is a total different and separate case. Which shall be dealt in another trial. For now the woman (whatever her reasons maybe) is guilty of throwing boiling oil at the husband. She's guilty for committing the act.

However, as I mention earlier if there has been a history of abuse committed from her husband then a different trial must be made. Even thought both cases are related the criminal act is different.

The only thing that could link both cases is if the woman threw the oil at the husband in a form of self defense. If the investigators can connect that possiblity then the case should be trial as one.

Originally posted by silver_tears
What would be a good reason?

yeah I need to hear the answer to this one myself. 😑

Originally posted by PVS
not every post here is directed to you

you are not the center of the universe

sorry to break the bad news 🙁

She said all you males. This, for those confused as to what gender means, includes me. Speaking for me and only me. Don't you ever get tired of trying with me?

-AC

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
but wouldnt a shitman have a shithead? 😕

Originally posted by Wickerman
Actually it just came to me all of the sudden. however, seeing as how you admit to having heard the same thing before, that should say something about you eh?

~wickerman~

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
IF what she did was premediated and had no extenuating circumstances, then she should get the full weight of the law IMHO. And sorry wickerman for lumping you in the males category.

😂 no need to appologize, seeing as how i am a male. What you should be appologizing for is the fact that you generalised 😉

Aye.....but would the "extenuating" circumstances be that important assuming the guy dies? That's what the current debate is about. I say no.

~wickerman~

Originally posted by WindDancer
The fact is that a crime has been committed agaisn't the husband. Whether it was an abusive relationship or spousal abuse is a total different and separate case. Which shall be dealt in another trial. For now the woman (whatever her reasons maybe) is guilty of throwing boiling oil at the husband. She's guilty for committing the act.

However, as I mention earlier if there has been abuse committed from her husband then a different trial must be made. Even thought both cases are related the criminal act is different.

The only thing that could link both cases is if the woman threw the oil at the husband in a form of self defense. If the investigators can connect that possiblity then the case should be trial as one.

I never even thought of it being as self-defense, which is actuallly a fairly good possibility.

See? More details on the case are needed.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
She said all you males. This, for those confused as to what gender means, includes me. Speaking for me and only me. Don't you ever get tired of trying with me?

-AC

what I meant was the males currently involved in the discusssion. You came back in out of nowhere and assumed I was speaking about you, when in fact nothing that you've said up til now has warranted a post by me.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
She said all you males. This, for those confused as to what gender means, includes me. Speaking for me and only me. Don't you ever get tired of trying with me?

-AC

i think it also includes me (checks genetalia) YUP me too.
she requested that all males not jump to conclusions.
she didn't say that all males DID jump to conclusions.

see?

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
what I meant was the males currently involved in the discusssion. You came back in out of nowhere and assumed I was speaking about you, when in fact nothing that you've said up til now has warranted a post by me.

Might wanna rephrase the whole "all you males" then 😉. Because your post came some time after I had returned.

No harm or foul.

-AC

Originally posted by FeceMan

Did you take a detour past the sarcasm?

I ignore bad quality sarcasm ❌

~wickerman~

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm curious as to who said it was a female thing solely.

Someone provide me with this info (and think before you quote me).

-AC

Obviously not solely, but you said that this one was so female, generalising obviously, and I'm still puzzled as to how you can call it that , when it wasn't even a female who came up with the practice to start with.

Anyways must run. Bye all.

Cya Irene 🙂

Originally posted by Wickerman
Actually, during Middle Ages, when defending a fortress it was customary for the men defending to be either outside fighting or shooting with bows and arrows, while the women and children pour cauldrons of hot burning oil on the invaders and throw rocks at them so there 😛

~wickerman~

Ah I was referring to the catholic church and the inquisition in my post, pardon me.

I did it for a project for my government class, afraid I don't have the exact data anymore. I think I researched about 100 different cases, and in I believe around 80 of them, the police did nothing

100? That's it? There are probably Tens of thousands of domestic disturbance reports a year, just because 80 out of the 100 domestic cases you researched yielded nothing doesn't mean it's that way for all of them. Also, what kind of reports did you research? Was it simply all sorts of domestic disturbance ones, small and large? Or was it only extreme ones where the wife was actually in real danger? Because there are plenty of reports that end up being total bullshit where simply histerical woman is afraid over nothing, or a woman is blowing it out of proportion, not all are worth following or arresting someone over. I'm sure the ones with some real form of danger are taken seriously by cops.

Plus there's another factor that no one's mentioned yet - though it's one that I myself don't understand - but there are many times where a women will stay in an abusive relationship because she still loves her husband and doesn't want to leave erm I can't quite figure that one out myself, but it does happen.

Again, their problem, and also, their choice.

Originally posted by PVS
i think it also includes me (checks genetalia) YUP me too.
she requested that all males not jump to conclusions.
she didn't say that all males DID jump to conclusions.

see?

Yes, I read her post. I was confirming that in my earlier post, I had agreed with her. Because by sheer definition of her post, at the time, she was referring to me and every other male here.

She was making a request that wasn't REALLY needed. But I've discussed this with her.

Glad we had this chat, always a pleasure.

-AC

its been said over and over. none of us can conclude a damn thing. i think until more of this story unfolds, we're all just blowing hot air and exhibiting our own bias and prejudice.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Don't know a whole ton about the case, but it's on the news here in Michigan. Apparently the woman poured the oil, quite literally, all over her husband. (I'm not italicizing to make you think of his genitals. My intent is to make you think about all over his entire body.)

My verdict? Death penalty. Or she gets the same treatment.

Originally posted by Wickerman
I ignore bad quality sarcasm ❌

~wickerman~

Ah, the fire in your bellies...I love it! Keep it coming, people--there's nothing better than a fiery debate on a slow evening.

Originally posted by silver_tears
Ah I was referring to the catholic church and the inquisition in my post, pardon me.

Catholic church......pardon me.......damn your puns 😛

Ahem......i know 😉

~wickerman~

Originally posted by silver_tears
What would be a good reason?

Maybe he was in an abusive relationship, maybe she was threatening to kill him in his sleep or cut his dick off or dump boiling oil on him, maybe she hit him and beat him up and kicked him in the nuts all the time when she was pissed off. Now if he ended up beating her up really badly for any of these reasons, but the information wasn't available, are you telling me that you same people in this thread wouldn't be calling him horrific names and judging him the same many are judging the woman?