Originally posted by Count Makashi
O shit, i have read the first page to, i cant believe this guys, they wore baned because of this, tell me they wore posting stuff like that, that Exar would defeat Yoda, Mace and Dooku, 3 on 1, thats beyond fanbojism.
Not only beat those 3, but pwn them. Damn, I was here during those times, but I rarely posted back then. Nice guys (some at least), but flawed views.
Haha, I started this junk. I came to KMC with my opinions, and then I read what people had to say about Kun and the Ancients, it made no sense to me, but, I went along with it, because, it was just some online thread, I didn't really care what people thought. A lot of them were good debaters, but, like Kamikz said, they had flawed views.
Oh well, that was over a year ago.
Originally posted by jollyjim311
Haha, I started this junk. I came to KMC with my opinions, and then I read what people had to say about Kun and the Ancients, it made no sense to me, but, I went along with it, because, it was just some online thread, I didn't really care what people thought. A lot of them were good debaters, but, like Kamikz said, they had flawed views.Oh well, that was over a year ago.
You started this junk, i am very disappointed, bad jollyjim, bad.
Originally posted by Count Makashi
You started this junk, i am very disappointed, bad jollyjim, bad.
You have no idea what went on in this forum before you were here.
You never had to witness the cold iron grasp on the Antediluvian click running KMC.
It was pretty bad... to say the least.
It's true. The level of bias and illogical behavior from those who claimed - and very well appeared - to be the "pinnacles of logic" shows just how very much deluded an intelligent mind can be. Not that that detracts anything from people like Janus, Illustrious, or Nai Fohl. They are remarkably intelligent people and extremely skilled debaters (even if the points they were trying to make were fundamentally flawed to begin with). The fact that they imposed so many taboos involving the Ancient Sith, Count Dooku, Exar Kun, and Sidious is simply testament to their level of charisma and skill.
The difference now is, most of these people have re-evaluated and reconstructed their opinions. They won't, of course, admit that their beliefs of "Ragnos can uberpwn DE Sidious, DN Luke, and Exar Kun!" were flawed and wrong, but none of the die-hards will argue it anymore. I particularly enjoyed Traya's walkthrough of Ragnos's Gauntlet thread, how he could "take them all with ease", and may not even require all of his limbs to do it.
The cold, truth of the matter is, no one here has their exact level of intelligence or skill. And yet our theories seem to be more logical, and we can support ours with much more evidence than they could muster.
It's funny how things work.
Originally posted by Gideon
It's true. The level of bias and illogical behavior from those who claimed - and very well appeared - to be the "pinnacles of logic" shows just how very much deluded an intelligent mind can be. Not that that detracts anything from people like Janus, Illustrious, or Nai Fohl. They are remarkably intelligent people and extremely skilled debaters (even if the points they were trying to make were fundamentally flawed to begin with). The fact that they imposed so many taboos involving the Ancient Sith, Count Dooku, Exar Kun, and Sidious is simply testament to their level of charisma and skill.The difference now is, most of these people have re-evaluated and reconstructed their opinions. They won't, of course, admit that their beliefs of "Ragnos can uberpwn DE Sidious, DN Luke, and Exar Kun!" were flawed and wrong, but none of the die-hards will argue it anymore. I particularly enjoyed Traya's walkthrough of Ragnos's Gauntlet thread, how he could "take them all with ease", and may not even require all of his limbs to do it.
The cold, truth of the matter is, no one here has their exact level of intelligence or skill. And yet our theories seem to be more logical, and we can support ours with much more evidence than they could muster.
It's funny how things work.
I hear you.
Wasn't the whole "Ragnos owns all" theory based on a grammatical error?
Marka Ragnos ruled the galaxy with an iron fist. He was the Dark Lord of the Sith -- the most powerful of the most powerful.
That would mean the "most powerful of the most powerful" comment refers to "Dark Lord of the Sith," not specifically Ragnos. It started that the DLOTS was the most powerful, and Ragnos was the DLOTS. Not that Ragnos is above any other character, and especially ones that didn't come around until thousands of years later.
Am I making any sense, or just babbling?