OneDumbG0
Find Your Own Fire
People have wondered whether those two lines were editorial mistakes. I saw it too. Two different contradicting lines spoken at two different times. One is quoting the other. I've read in other threads that parallax quoting is more reliable. Apaprently, you guys think the second one is unreliable. At that point, it is unclear because it could go either way. But if you take it the way I read it, and the first one is an editorial oversight, which admittedly, not very many people saw at first, and the second comment quoting is the right one, my premises stand as ultimately foolproof except in the face of older comics. However, taking the first to be right, and the second to be wrong still does not change the way the characters behaved, especially Parallax and Spectre himself and the way Geoff Johns presented the story, plotwise and character design wise. So, if we both agree that those statements can read either way, (of course I think the second one is much more clearer and unambiguous and therefore stronger) you line up my presmises and explanations against your own and on a purely dialectic level, they don't stand up.
Spectre doesn't feel like seperating Parallax and Hal? Spectre doesn't feel like shutting off Shazam's power feed when he first battles Cap? Ganthellax is ginormously huge compared to Specthallax because he was just trying to be intimidating? Parallax in his emergence in #3 shreds Spectre and Hal like husks because he was bluffing? The climax of heightened crisis diminishes towards the end of the story? These inconsistencies, in and of itself, clearly show that your conclusions are weak at best. The fact that now your pointing to an editorial ambiguity to bypass these inconsistencies also points to the weakness of your hypothesis. Apparently, the sole evidence you place on Spectre > ganthet w/power of Guardians is now an editorial oversight that could go either way? If that's the case, I have no need to point out anything further and I'll let you chew on it for a while.
Edit: These 3 links point to people on different wavelengths with regards to the editorial oversight. The 2nd one is most on point, but the thread pretty much agrees, the editorial oversight was the 1st comment, not the second:
http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?t=77861&page=2&pp=15
http://dcboards.warnerbros.com/web/thread.jspa?threadID=2000042135&messageID=2001237293
http://www.kryptonsite.com/forums/showthread/t-39960.html